Samsung Galaxy A14 4G vs HiSense Hisense E60 Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1
Samsung Galaxy A14 4G
Smartphone 2
HiSense Hisense E60
Smartphone 3
Samsung Galaxy A14 4G or HiSense Hisense E60 Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
| Brand and model | Samsung Galaxy A14 4G | HiSense Hisense E60 | |
| Rating | (+1) | (+2) | |
| Release date | 2023, February 28 | April, 2022 | |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 167.7 x 78 x 9.1 mm | 6.6 x 6.6 x 3.07 in | 174.1 x 79.5 x 8.7 mm | 6.85 x 6.85 x 3.13 in | |
| Weight | 201 g | 7.09 oz | 219 g | 7.73 oz | |
| Body Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Plastic | |
| Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
| Colors | Black, Dark Red, Silver, Green | Blue, Gray | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh, Li-Po, non-removable | 5000 mAh, Li-Ion, non-removable | |
| Approximate price | $ 160 | ||
| Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
| Technology | PLS LCD | LCD IPS | |
| Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
| Display colors | 16M | 16M | |
| Screen size | 6.6" in | 6.95" in | |
| Screen area | 104.9 cm2 | ||
| Screen format | 20:9 (height:width) | 21:9 (height:width) | |
| Screen to body ratio | 80.2% | 82% | |
| Screen resolution | 1080 x 2408 px | 1080 x 2460 px | |
| Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 400 PPI | 387 PPI | |
| Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
| Rear camera, main | 50 MP, Triple | 16 MP, Triple | |
| Camera specs | -50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF -5 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) -2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) |
-16 MP, Unknow, (wide), -5 MP, ƒ/ 2.4, (depth), -2 MP, (macro) |
|
| Functions | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual LED flash | |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p video | |
| Front camera, selfie | 13 MP, Single | 8 MP, Single | |
| Specifications | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 8 MP, ƒ/ | |
| Video | 1080p@30fps |
Performance
| Operating system - OS | Android 13, One UI Core 5 | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| Chipset | - Mediatek MT6769 Helio G80 (12 nm) - Exynos 850 (8nm) - USA |
- Spreadtrum Unisoc SC9863A (28 nm) | |
| CPU | - Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) - USA |
- Octa-Core (4x Cortex A55 1.6 GHz + 4x Cortex A55 1.2 GHz) | |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | PowerVR GE8322 | |
| External memory | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | ||
| Internal memory | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 4GB 64GB, 4GB · 64GB |
Benchmark
| Antutu 9 Total | 145741 | 121303 | |
| GeekBench 6 Single Core | 213 | ||
| GeekBench 6 Multi Core | 1005 | ||
| GeekBench 5 Single Core | 502 | ||
| GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 1600 |
Communication and Connectivity
| SIM card | Single SIM (Nano-SIM)Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Dual SIM, dual stand-by (Nano SIM + Nano SIM) | |
| Network | GSM / HSPA / LTE | 2G / 3G / 4G / | |
| Bands | -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual sim model only) -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 -4G - 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
-2G - B2 (1900), B3 (1800), B5 (850), B8 (900) -3G - B1 (2100), B2 (1900), B4 (1700/2100 AWS A-F), B5 (850), B8 (900) -4G - B1 (2100), B2 (1900), B4 (1700/2100 AWS 1), B5 (850), B7 (2600), B12 (700), B26 (850), B28b (700), B28a (700) |
|
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | ||
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | 802.11b, 802.11g, 802.11n, 802.11n 5GHz,Dual band ,Wi-Fi Hotspot | |
| GPS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, A-GPS | |
| NFC | Yes | No | |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | Yes, USB Type C, USB On-The-Go (OTG) | |
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | Bluetooth 4.2, A2DP | |
| Harmful irradiation |
SAR EU - 0.46 W/kg (head) 1.37 W/kg (body) |
Music and Audio
| Radio | Yes | ||
| Headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
Other features
| Sensors | - Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | - Fingerprint (side-mounted), Proximity, Accelerometer , Infrared port | |
| Other extras |
- Fast charging 15W |
Reviews and Opinions on Samsung Galaxy A14 4G and HiSense Hisense E60
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!
