Samsung Galaxy A20e vs Samsung Galaxy A03s Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Smartphone 2
Samsung Galaxy A03s
Smartphone 3
Samsung Galaxy A20e or Samsung Galaxy A03s Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
| Brand and model | Samsung Galaxy A20e | Samsung Galaxy A03s | |
| Rating | (+) | (+) | |
| Release date | 2019, April | 2021, August 18 | |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 147.4 x 69.7 x 8.4 mm | 5.8 x 5.8 x 2.74 in | 164.2 x 75.9 x 9.1 mm | 6.46 x 6.46 x 2.99 in | |
| Weight | 141 g | 4.97 oz | 196 g | 6.91 oz | |
| Body Build | Front glass, plastic body | ||
| Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
| Colors | Black, White, Blue, Coral | Black, Blue. White | |
| Battery | 3000 mAh, Non-removable Li-Po | 5000 mAh, Li-Po, non-removable | |
| Approximate price | 180 EUR | 130 EUR | |
| Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
| Technology | PLS TFT | PLS LCD | |
| Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
| Display colors | 16M | 16M | |
| Screen size | 5.8" in | 6.5" in | |
| Screen area | 82.6 cm2 | 102.0 cm2 | |
| Screen format | 19.5:9 (height:width) | 20:9 (height:width) | |
| Screen to body ratio | 80.4% | 81.8% | |
| Screen resolution | 720 x 1560 px | 720 x 1600 px | |
| Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 296 PPI | 270 PPI | |
| Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
| Rear camera, main | 13 MP, Dual | 13 MP, Triple | |
| Camera specs | -13 MP, f/1.9, 28mm (wide), AF -5 MP, f/2.2, 12mm (ultrawide) |
-13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF -2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) -2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
|
| Functions | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash | |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps | |
| Front camera, selfie | 8 MP, Single | 5 MP, Single | |
| Specifications | 8 MP, f/2.0 | 5 MP, f/2.2 |
Performance
| Operating system - OS | Android 9.0 (Pie); One UI | Android 11, One UI 3.0 | |
| Chipset | - Exynos 7884 Octa (14 nm) | - MediaTek MT6765 Helio P35 (12nm) | |
| CPU | - Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A73 & 6x1.35 GHz Cortex-A53) | - Octa-core (4x2.35 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | |
| GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 | PowerVR GE8320 | |
| External memory | microSD, up to 1 TB (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | |
| Internal memory | 32 GB, 3 GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM |
Benchmark
| Antutu 9 Total | 117345 | ||
| Antutu 7 Total | |||
| GeekBench 6 Single Core | 241 | ||
| GeekBench 6 Multi Core | 752 | ||
| GeekBench 5 Single Core | 237 | 175 | |
| GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 863 | 983 |
Communication and Connectivity
| SIM card | Single SIM (Nano-SIM)Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | |
| Network | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE | |
| Bands | -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM only) -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 -4G - LTE |
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only) -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 -4G - 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
|
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | |
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | |
| GPS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | |
| NFC | Yes | No | |
| USB | 2.0, Type-C 1.0 reversible connector | USB Type-C 2.0 | |
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP | |
| Harmful irradiation | SAR - 0.50 W/kg (head) 1.30 W/kg (body) |
SAR EU - 0.36 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
Music and Audio
| Radio | FM radio | ||
| Headphone jack | Yes | Yes | |
| Others | - Active noise cancellation with dedicated mic |
Other features
| Sensors | - Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | - Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | |
| Other extras |
- Fast battery charging 15W |
- Fast charging 15W |
|
| Versions |
- Versions: SM-A202F/DS (Global) |
Reviews and Opinions on Samsung Galaxy A20e and Samsung Galaxy A03s
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!
