Samsung Galaxy A24 4G vs Honor X9 Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1
Samsung Galaxy A24 4G
Smartphone 2
Honor X9
Smartphone 3
Samsung Galaxy A24 4G or Honor X9 Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
| Brand and model | Samsung Galaxy A24 4G | Honor X9 | |
| Rating | (+0) | (+0) | |
| Release date | 2023, April 19 | 2022, March 31 | |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 162.1 x 77.6 x 8.3 mm | 6.38 x 6.38 x 3.06 in | 166.1 x 75.8 x 8.1 mm | 6.54 x 6.54 x 2.98 in | |
| Weight | 195 g | 6.88 oz | 189 g | 6.67 oz | |
| Body Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | ||
| Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
| Colors | Black, Lime Green, Blue gradient, Dark red | Titanium Silver, Ocean Blue, Midnight Black | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh, Li-Po, non-removable | 4800 mAh, Li-Po, non-removable | |
| Approximate price | 190 EUR | 230 EUR | |
| Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
| Technology | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD | |
| Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
| Display colors | 16M | 16M | |
| Screen size | 6.5" in | 6.81" in | |
| Screen area | 103.7 cm2 | 112.3 cm2 | |
| Screen format | 19.5:9 (height:width) | ||
| Screen to body ratio | 82.4% | 89.2% | |
| Screen resolution | 1080 x 2340 px | 1080 x 2388 px | |
| Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 396 PPI | 0 PPI | |
| Other specs | - 90Hz, 1000 nits (peak) | - 90Hz | |
| Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
| Rear camera, main | 50 MP, Triple | 64 MP, Quad | |
| Camera specs | -50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS -5 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/5'', 1.12µm -2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) |
-64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF -8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) -2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) -2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
|
| Functions | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR | |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps | |
| Front camera, selfie | 13 MP, Single | 16 MP, Single | |
| Specifications | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5 | |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
Performance
| Operating system - OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6 | Android 11, Magic UI 4.2 | |
| Chipset | - Mediatek Helio G99 (6nm) | - Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | |
| CPU | - Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | - Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 610 | |
| External memory | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No | |
| Internal memory | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
Benchmark
| Antutu 9 Total | 370758 | 249765 | |
| GeekBench 5 Single Core | 561 | 379 | |
| GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 1943 | 1500 |
Communication and Connectivity
| SIM card | Single SIM (Nano-SIM)Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Single SIM (Nano-SIM)Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | |
| Network | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE | |
| Bands | -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM only) -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 -4G - 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM) -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 -4G - LTE |
|
| Speed | HSPA, LTE-A | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A | |
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes | |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, USB On-The-Go | |
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE | |
| Harmful irradiation |
SAR EU - 0.41 W/kg (head) 1.30 W/kg (body) |
Music and Audio
| Radio | No | ||
| Headphone jack | Yes | No |
Other features
| Sensors | - Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | - Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | |
| Other extras |
- Virtual proximity sensing - Fast charging 25W |
- Fast charging 66W, 81% in 30 min |
Reviews and Opinions on Samsung Galaxy A24 4G and Honor X9
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!
