Samsung Galaxy A25 vs Samsung Galaxy M34 5G Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1
Samsung Galaxy A25
Smartphone 2
Samsung Galaxy M34 5G
Smartphone 3
Differences between Samsung Galaxy A25 and Samsung Galaxy M34 5G - Which to Choose?
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy A25:
- Larger battery capacity at 5000mAh
- Higher AnTuTu v10 benchmark score for overall performance
- Comes with the latest Android 14 and One UI 6 out of the box
- Possesses a macro camera for close-up photography
- Available in more color options
- Slightly higher screen-to-body ratio at 84.2%
- Has NFC (market/region dependent)
- May have stereo speakers for an enhanced audio experience (though this is not explicitly confirmed)
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy M34 5G:
- More affordable with a lower price point at 190 EUR
- Higher battery capacity at 6000mAh
- Screen is protected with Corning Gorilla Glass 5
- Marginally larger 6.5-inch display with the same 1080 x 2340 resolution
- Includes USB OTG support for connecting additional devices
Overall, the Galaxy A25 offers the latest software and potentially better multimedia capabilities, while the Galaxy M34 5G is more affordable and includes a sturdier screen and larger battery capacity. Your choice might depend on whether you prioritize software updates, battery life, or media features.
Samsung Galaxy A25 or Samsung Galaxy M34 5G Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
| Brand and model | Samsung Galaxy A25 | Samsung Galaxy M34 5G | |
| Rating | (+0) | (+0) | |
| Release date | 2023, December 11 | 2023, July 03 | |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 161 x 76.5 x 8.3 mm | 6.34 x 6.34 x 3.01 in | 161.7 x 77.2 x 8.8 mm | 6.37 x 6.37 x 3.04 in | |
| Weight | 197 g | 6.95 oz | 208 g | 7.34 oz | |
| Body Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | ||
| Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
| Colors | Brave Black, Personality Yellow, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue | Midnight Blue, Prism Silver, Waterfall Blue | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh, Li-Po, non-removable | 6000 mAh, Li-Po, non-removable | |
| Approximate price | 250 EUR | 190 EUR | |
| Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
| Technology | Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED | |
| Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
| Display colors | 16M | 16M | |
| Screen size | 6.5" in | 6.5" in | |
| Screen area | 103.7 cm2 | 103.7 cm2 | |
| Screen format | 19.5:9 (height:width) | 19.5:9 (height:width) | |
| Screen to body ratio | 84.2% | 83.1% | |
| Screen resolution | 1080 x 2340 px | 1080 x 2340 px | |
| Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 396 PPI | 396 PPI | |
| Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | ||
| Other specs | - 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) - |
- 120Hz, 1000 nits (peak) | |
| Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
| Rear camera, main | 50 MP, Triple | 50 MP, Triple | |
| Camera specs | -50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, OIS -8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4", 1.12µm -2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) |
-50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS -8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) -2 MP, f/2.4 |
|
| Functions | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR | |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | |
| Front camera, selfie | 13 MP, Single | 13 MP, Single | |
| Specifications | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
Performance
| Operating system - OS | Android 14, One UI 6 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6 | |
| Chipset | - Exynos 1280 (5 nm) | - Exynos 1280 (5 nm) | |
| CPU | - Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | - Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | |
| GPU | Mali-G68 | Mali-G68 | |
| External memory | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | |
| Internal memory | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
Benchmark
| Antutu 10 Total | 456574 | 451934 | |
| Antutu 10 CPU | 158675 | 142475 | |
| Antutu 10 GPU | 106345 | 105012 | |
| Antutu 10 Mem | 75632 | 82002 | |
| Antutu 10 UX | 158675 | 142475 | |
| Antutu 9 Total | 415793 | ||
| GeekBench 6 Single Core | 971 | ||
| GeekBench 6 Multi Core | 2101 | ||
| GeekBench 5 Single Core | 753 | ||
| GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 2231 |
Communication and Connectivity
| SIM card | Single SIM (Nano-SIM) or Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | |
| Network | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | |
| Bands | -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM only) -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 -4G - 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 -5G - 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 26, 28, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 -4G - LTE -5G - SA/NSA/Sub6 |
|
| Speed | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G | |
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes | |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | |
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE | |
| Harmful irradiation |
SAR EU - 0.46 W/kg (head) 1.19 W/kg (body) |
SAR - 0.89 W/kg (head) |
Music and Audio
| Radio | Market/region dependent | ||
| Headphone jack | Yes | Yes | |
| Others |
Other features
| Sensors | - Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity | - Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity | |
| Other extras |
- 25W Fast charging |
- Fast charging 25W |
Reviews and Opinions on Samsung Galaxy A25 and Samsung Galaxy M34 5G
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!
