Samsung Galaxy A34 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A51 5G Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1

Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Smartphone 2

Samsung Galaxy A51 5G
Smartphone 3
Differences between Samsung Galaxy A34 5G and Samsung Galaxy A51 5G - Which to Choose?
Reasons to consider the Galaxy A34 5G:
- Newer model year (2023)
- Better battery capacity (5000 mAh)
- Higher memory options available (up to 256GB 8GB RAM)
- Bigger screen size (6.6 inches)
- Higher screen refresh rate (120Hz)
- More durable screen protection (Corning Gorilla Glass 5)
- Updated operating system (Android 13, One UI 5.1)
- More advanced Bluetooth version (5.3)
- Better AnTuTu benchmark performance (score 556613)
- Fast charging 25W
- Stereo speakers
- Higher resolution selfie camera video (4K@30fps)
Reasons to consider the Galaxy A51 5G:
- Slightly lighter (187g vs 199g)
- Dedicated memory card slot
- Slightly higher PPI screen (405 PPI)
- Higher resolution front camera (32 MP)
- 3.5mm headphone jack
- FM radio capability
- Aluminum frame build
- Quad camera system
- Higher resolution main camera video (2160p@30fps)
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G or Samsung Galaxy A51 5G Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
Brand and model | Samsung Galaxy A34 5G | Samsung Galaxy A51 5G | |
Rating | 0) | (+0) | (+|
Release date | 2023, March 14 | 2020, April 8 | |
Dimensions (HxWxD) | 161.3 x 78.1 x 8.2 mm | 6.35 x 6.35 x 3.07 in | 158.9 x 73.6 x 8.7 mm | 6.26 x 6.26 x 2.9 in | |
Weight | 199 g | 7.02 oz | 187 g | 6.6 oz | |
Body Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, aluminum frame | |
Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
Colors | Lime, Graphite, Violet, Silver | Prism Cube Black, Prism Cube White, Prism Cube Pink | |
Battery | 5000 mAh, Li-Po, non-removable | 4500 mAh, Non-removable Li-Po | |
Approximate price | 389 EUR | $ 500 | |
Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
Technology | Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED | |
Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
Display colors | 16M | 16M | |
Screen size | 6.6" in | 6.5" in | |
Screen area | 106.9 cm2 | 102.0 cm2 | |
Screen format | 19.5:9 (height:width) | 20:9 (height:width) | |
Screen to body ratio | 84.9% | 87.2% | |
Screen resolution | 1080 x 2340 px | 1080 x 2400 px | |
Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 390 PPI | 405 PPI | |
Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | |
Other specs | - 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) | ||
Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
Rear camera, main | 48 MP, Triple | 48 MP, Quad | |
Camera specs | -48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0'', 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS -8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0'', 1.12µm -5 MP, f/2.4, (macro) |
-48 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF -12 MP, f/2.2, 123° (ultrawide) -5 MP, f/2.4, (macro) -5 MP, f/2.2, (depth) |
|
Functions | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR | |
Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps | 2160p@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps; gyro-EIS | |
DxOMark Main Score | 92 | 87 | |
DxOMark Photo | 99 | 90 | |
DxOMark Video | 78 | 86 | |
Front camera, selfie | 13 MP, Single | 32 MP, Single | |
Specifications | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1'', 1.12µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8'', 0.8µm | |
Functions | HDR | ||
Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
Performance
Operating system - OS | Android 13, One UI 5.1 | Android 10.0; One UI 2 | |
Chipset | - Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) | - Exynos 980 (8 nm) | |
CPU | - Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | - Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A77 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex A55) | |
GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G76 MP5 | |
External memory | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | |
Internal memory | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
Benchmark
Antutu 10 Total | 556613 | 246627 | |
Antutu 10 CPU | 172806 | 71068 | |
Antutu 10 GPU | 116205 | 44877 | |
Antutu 10 Mem | 115870 | 64528 | |
Antutu 10 UX | 172806 | 71068 | |
Antutu 9 Total | 473852 | ||
Antutu 8 Total | 192677 | ||
GeekBench 6 Single Core | 817 | ||
GeekBench 6 Multi Core | 1897 | ||
GeekBench 6 OpenCL | 1064 | ||
GeekBench 6 Vulkan | 1980 | ||
GeekBench 5 Single Core | 780 | 638 | |
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 2341 | 1791 |
Communication and Connectivity
SIM card | Single SIM (Nano-SIM)Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Single SIM (Nano-SIM)Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | |
Network | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | |
Bands | -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only) -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 -4G - LTE -5G - SA/NSA/Sub6 |
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only) -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 -4G - LTE band 1(2100), 2(1900), 3(1800), 4(1700/2100), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 12(700), 13(700), 17(700), 20(800), 26(850), 28(700), 38(2600), 40(2300), 41(2500), 66(1700/2100) -5G - 5G SA/NSA |
|
Speed | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G | |
GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
Edge | Yes | Yes | |
Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | |
GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | |
NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes | |
USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | 2.0, Type-C 1.0 reversible connector, USB On-The-Go | |
Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE | |
Harmful irradiation |
SAR EU - 0.55 W/kg (head) 1.49 W/kg (body) |
Music and Audio
Radio | No | FM radio, RDS, recording | |
Headphone jack | No | Yes | |
Others |
Other features
Sensors | - Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity | - Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | |
Other extras |
- Fast charging 25W - IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 mins) |
- ANT+ - Fast charging 15W |
|
Versions |
- Versions: SM-A516F/DSN (Global) |
Reviews and Opinions on Samsung Galaxy A34 5G and Samsung Galaxy A51 5G
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!