Samsung Galaxy A52 vs Nokia 9300i Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1

Samsung Galaxy A52
Smartphone 2

Nokia 9300i
Smartphone 3
Samsung Galaxy A52 or Nokia 9300i Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
Brand and model | Samsung Galaxy A52 | Nokia 9300i | |
Rating | 0) | (+0) | (+|
Release date | 2021, March 17 | 2005, November | |
Dimensions (HxWxD) | 159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm | 6.3 x 6.3 x 2.96 in | 132 x 51 x 21 mm | 5.2 x 5.2 x 2.01 in | |
Weight | 189 g | 6.67 oz | 172 g | 6.07 oz | |
Body Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back | ||
Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
Colors | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Violet, Awesome Blue | Silver | |
Battery | 4500 mAh, Li-Po, non-removable | 1100 mAh, Removable Li-Po | |
Battery life |
Stand by time - Up to 230 h Talking time - Up to 8 h |
||
Keyboard | QWERTY | ||
Approximate price | 340 EUR | 250 EUR | |
Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
Technology | Super AMOLED | TFT | |
Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | ||
Display colors | 16M | 65K | |
Screen size | 6.5" in | 4" in | |
Screen area | 101 cm2 | 29.4 cm2 | |
Screen format | 20:9 (height:width) | ||
Screen to body ratio | 84,1% | 43.7% | |
Screen resolution | 1080 x 2400 px | 640 x 200 px | |
Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 407 PPI | 0 PPI | |
Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | ||
Other specs | - 90Hz -800 nits (peak) |
- Second LCD (128 x 128 pixels) with 65K color -5-way navigation key |
|
Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
Rear camera, main | 64 MP, Quad | 0 MP, | |
Camera specs | -64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7X'', 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS -12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm -5 MP, f/2.4, (macro) -5 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
||
Functions | LED flash, panorama, HDR | ||
Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS | ||
DxOMark Main Score | 102 | ||
DxOMark Photo | 107 | ||
DxOMark Video | 90 | ||
Front camera, selfie | 32 MP, Single | 0 MP, | |
Specifications | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8'', 0.8µm | ||
Functions | HDR | ||
Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
Performance
Operating system - OS | Android 11, One UI 3.1 | Symbian 7.0s, Series 80 v2.0 UI | |
Chipset | - Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) | - TI OMAP 1510 | |
CPU | - Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) | - 150 MHz ARM925T | |
GPU | Adreno 618 | ||
External memory | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | MMC, up to 2 GB | |
Internal memory | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 80 MB |
Benchmark
Antutu 9 Total | 341091 | ||
GeekBench 6 Single Core | 685 | ||
GeekBench 6 Multi Core | 1667 | ||
GeekBench 6 OpenCL | 1149 | ||
GeekBench 6 Vulkan | 1045 | ||
GeekBench 5 Single Core | 517 | ||
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 1571 |
Communication and Connectivity
SIM card | Single SIM (Nano-SIM)Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Mini-SIM | |
Network | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM | |
Bands | -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only) -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 -4G - LTE |
||
Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A | ||
GPRS | Yes | Class 10 | |
Edge | Yes | Class 10 | |
Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11g | |
GPS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | No | |
NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | ||
USB | USB Type-C 2.0, USB On-The-Go | Pop-Port | |
Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 1.2 | |
Harmful irradiation |
SAR EU - 0.35 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) |
SAR - 0.21 W/kg (head) 0.58 W/kg (body) SAR EU - 0.29 W/kg (head) |
Music and Audio
Radio | No | ||
Headphone jack | Yes | No | |
Others |
Other features
Sensors | - Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | , Infrared port | |
Other extras |
- ANT+ - Fast charging 25W, 50% in 30 min - IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 mins) |
- Music player MP3, MP4(AAC), RA, MIDI -Document viewer (Word, Excel, PowerPoint, PDF) -Organizer |
|
Versions |
- Also known as Samsung Galaxy A52 4G |
Reviews and Opinions on Samsung Galaxy A52 and Nokia 9300i
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!