Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G vs vivo V21 5G Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Smartphone 2
vivo V21 5G
Smartphone 3
Differences between Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G and vivo V21 5G - Which to Choose?
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G:
- Higher refresh rate of 120Hz for smoother visuals.
- Greater battery capacity at 4500 mAh.
- Corning Gorilla Glass 5 screen protection.
- Stereo speakers for better sound quality.
- Has NFC capability (market/region dependent).
- Includes a 3.5mm headphone jack.
- Offers IP67 dust/water resistance.
- Higher AnTuTu benchmark scores indicating better overall performance.
Reasons to consider the vivo V21 5G:
- Slightly lighter weight at 176g.
- Higher front camera resolution of 44MP with OIS for potentially better selfies.
- AMOLED screen with HDR10+ support.
- Fast charging 33W, which can charge the battery to 63% in 30 minutes.
- Bluetooth 5.1 support for possibly better connectivity.
- Lower SAR values indicating lower radio frequency exposure.
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G or vivo V21 5G Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
| Brand and model | Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G | vivo V21 5G | |
| Rating | (+0) | (+0) | |
| Release date | 2021, August 17 | 2021, April 27 | |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm | 6.3 x 6.3 x 2.96 in | 159.7 x 73.9 x 7.3 mm | 6.29 x 6.29 x 2.91 in | |
| Weight | 189 g | 6.67 oz | 176 g | 6.21 oz | |
| Body Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | |
| Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
| Colors | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Purple, Awesome Mint | Dusk Blue, Sunset Dazzle, Arctic White | |
| Battery | 4500 mAh, Li-Po, non-removable | 4000 mAh, Li-Po, non-removable | |
| Approximate price | 440 EUR | ||
| Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
| Technology | Super AMOLED | AMOLED | |
| Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
| Display colors | 16M | 16 M | |
| Screen size | 6.5" in | 6.44" in | |
| Screen area | 102.0 cm2 | 100.1 cm2 | |
| Screen format | 20:9 (height:width) | 20:9 (height:width) | |
| Screen to body ratio | 84.9% | 84.8% | |
| Screen resolution | 1080 x 2400 px | 1080 x 2400 px | |
| Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 405 PPI | 409 PPI | |
| Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | ||
| Other specs | - 120Hz -800 nits (HBM) |
- 90Hz -HDR10+ -500 nits (typ) |
|
| Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
| Rear camera, main | 64 MP, Quad | 64 MP, Triple | |
| Camera specs | -64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7'', 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS -12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm -5 MP, f/2.4, (macro) -5 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
-64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72'', 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS -8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0'', 1.12µm -2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) |
|
| Functions | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama | |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps (no OIS), 1080p@30/60fps | |
| DxOMark Main Score | 105 | ||
| DxOMark Photo | 112 | ||
| DxOMark Video | 92 | ||
| Front camera, selfie | 32 MP, Single | 44 MP, Single | |
| Specifications | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8'', 0.8µm | 44 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF, OIS | |
| Functions | HDR | Dual-LED flash, HDR | |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps (no OIS), 1080p@30fps |
Performance
| Operating system - OS | Android 11, One UI 3.1 | Android 11, Funtouch 11.1 | |
| Chipset | - Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) | - MediaTek MT6853 Dimensity 800U 5G (7 nm) | |
| CPU | - Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 670 & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 670) | - Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Mali-G57 MC3 | |
| External memory | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | |
| Internal memory | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
Benchmark
| Antutu 10 Total | 548467 | ||
| Antutu 10 CPU | 190588 | ||
| Antutu 10 GPU | 132749 | ||
| Antutu 10 Mem | 98217 | ||
| Antutu 10 UX | 190588 | ||
| Antutu 9 Total | 505147 | 302680 | |
| Antutu 8 Total | 428765 | ||
| GeekBench 6 Single Core | 940 | ||
| GeekBench 6 Multi Core | 2729 | ||
| GeekBench 6 OpenCL | 1930 | ||
| GeekBench 6 Vulkan | 2334 | ||
| GeekBench 5 Single Core | 720 | ||
| GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 2660 |
Communication and Connectivity
| SIM card | Single SIM (Nano-SIM)Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | |
| Network | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | |
| Bands | -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only) -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 -4G - 2, 4, 5, 12, 17, 26, 40, 41, 66 -5G - 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 -4G - 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 -5G - SA/NSA |
|
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A (CA) Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A, 5G | |
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | |
| GPS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | No | |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, USB On-The-Go | USB Type-C 2.0, USB On-The-Go | |
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE | |
| Harmful irradiation |
SAR - 0.72 W/kg (head) SAR EU - 0.88 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) |
SAR - 1.05 W/kg (head) 0.87 W/kg (body) SAR EU - 340 EUR |
Music and Audio
| Radio | No | ||
| Headphone jack | Yes | No | |
| Others |
Other features
| Sensors | - Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | - Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | |
| Other extras |
- ANT+ - Fast charging 25W - IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 mins) |
- Fast charging 33W, 63% in 30 min |
Reviews and Opinions on Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G and vivo V21 5G
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!
