Samsung Galaxy A53 5G vs Google Pixel 4 XL Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1

Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
Smartphone 2

Google Pixel 4 XL
Smartphone 3
Samsung Galaxy A53 5G or Google Pixel 4 XL Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
Brand and model | Samsung Galaxy A53 5G | Google Pixel 4 XL | |
Rating | 0) | (+0) | (+|
Release date | 2022, March 17 | 2019, October | |
Dimensions (HxWxD) | 159.6 x 74.8 x 8.1 mm | 6.28 x 6.28 x 2.94 in | 160.4 x 75.1 x 8.2 mm | 6.31 x 6.31 x 2.96 in | |
Weight | 189 g | 6.67 oz | 193 g | 6.81 oz | |
Body Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back | Front/back glass (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | |
Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
Colors | Black, White, Blue, Peach | Clearly White, Just Black, Oh So Orange | |
Battery | 5000 mAh, Li-Po, non-removable | 3700 mAh, Non-removable Li-Po | |
Approximate price | $ 320 | 900 EUR | |
Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
Technology | Super AMOLED | P-OLED | |
Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
Display colors | 16M | 16M | |
Screen size | 6.5" in | 6.3" in | |
Screen area | 102.0 cm2 | 98.0 cm2 | |
Screen format | 20:9 (height:width) | 19:9 (height:width) | |
Screen to body ratio | 85.4% | 81.3% | |
Screen resolution | 1080 x 2400 px | 1440 x 3040 px | |
Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 405 PPI | 537 PPI | |
Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | |
Other specs | - 120Hz -800 nits (HBM) |
- DCI-P3 100% -HDR -Always-on display -90Hz |
|
Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
Rear camera, main | 64 MP, Quad | 12.2 MP, Dual | |
Camera specs | -64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7X", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS -12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm -5 MP, f/2.4, (macro) -5 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
-12.2 MP, f/1.7, 28mm (wide), 1/2.55'', 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS -16 MP, f/2.4, 45mm (telephoto), 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 2x optical zoom |
|
Functions | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED flash, Auto-HDR, panorama | |
Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS | 2160p@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) | |
DxOMark Main Score | 105 | 112 | |
DxOMark Photo | 111 | 117 | |
DxOMark Video | 93 | 101 | |
Front camera, selfie | 32 MP, Single | 8 MP, Dual | |
Specifications | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8'', 0.8µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), 1.22µm, no AF TOF 3D camera |
|
Functions | HDR | Auto-HDR | |
Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps | |
DxOMark Selfie Score | 92 | ||
DxOMark Photo | 93 | ||
DxOMark Video | 91 |
Performance
Operating system - OS | Android 12, One UI 4.1 | Android 10 | |
Chipset | - Exynos 1280 (5 nm) | - Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) | |
CPU | - Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | - Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) | |
GPU | Mali-G68 | Adreno 640 | |
External memory | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No | |
Internal memory | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
Benchmark
Antutu 10 Total | 442531 | ||
Antutu 10 CPU | 137367 | ||
Antutu 10 GPU | 104515 | ||
Antutu 10 Mem | 83420 | ||
Antutu 10 UX | 137367 | ||
Antutu 9 Total | 414785 | ||
Antutu 8 Total | 425000 | ||
GeekBench 6 Single Core | 853 | 868 | |
GeekBench 6 Multi Core | 1911 | 2484 | |
GeekBench 6 OpenCL | 2294 | ||
GeekBench 6 Vulkan | 2302 | 2255 | |
GeekBench 5 Single Core | 691 | 621 | |
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 1789 | 2420 | |
GeekBench 4 Single Core | 2376 | ||
GeekBench 4 Multi-Core | 9045 |
Communication and Connectivity
SIM card | Single SIM (Nano-SIM) or Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM card & eSIM | |
Network | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE | |
Bands | -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only) -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 -4G - 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 14, 20, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66 - SM-A536U 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 13, 20, 28, 46, 48, 66 - SM-A536V -5G - 2, 5, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - SM-A536U 2, 5, 48, 66, 77, 78, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - SM-A536V |
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 CDMA 800 / 1900 -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 CDMA2000 1xEV-DO -4G - LTE band 1(2100), 2(1900), 3(1800), 4(1700/2100), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 12(700), 13(700), 17(700), 20(800), 25(1900), 26(850), 28(700), 32(1500), 38(2600), 39(1900), 40(2300), 41(2500), 66(1700/2100), 71(600) - Global LTE band 1(2100), 2(1900), 3(1800), 4(1700/2100), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 12(700), 13(700), 14(700), 17(700), 18(800), 19(800), 20(800), 25(1900), 26(850), 28(700), 29(700), 30(2300), 38(2600), 39(1900), 40(2300), 41(2500), 46(5200), 48, 66(1700/2100), 71(600) - USA |
|
Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A (5CA) Cat18 1200/150 Mbps | |
GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
Edge | Yes | Yes | |
Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA, hotspot | |
GPS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | |
NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes | |
USB | USB Type-C 2.0, USB On-The-Go | 3.1, Type-C 1.0 reversible connector | |
Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | |
Harmful irradiation |
SAR - 0.75 W/kg (head) 1.58 W/kg (body) SAR EU - 0.89 W/kg (head) 1.60 W/kg (body) |
Music and Audio
Radio | No | No | |
Headphone jack | No | No | |
Others | - Active noise cancellation with dedicated mic |
Other features
Sensors | - Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity | - Face ID, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | |
Other extras |
- Fast charging 25W - IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 mins) |
- Fast battery charging 18W -USB Power Delivery 2.0 -QI wireless charging - IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins) |
|
Versions |
- Also known as Google Pixel XL4 |
Reviews and Opinions on Samsung Galaxy A53 5G and Google Pixel 4 XL
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!