Samsung Galaxy A54 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Smartphone 2
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Smartphone 3
Differences between Samsung Galaxy A54 5G and Samsung Galaxy A52 5G - Which to Choose?
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy A54 5G:
- Battery Capacity: It has a larger battery (5000 mAh vs 4500 mAh in the A52 5G), which could mean longer battery life.
- Processor: The A54 5G is equipped with the Exynos 1380 chipset, which might offer better performance than the Snapdragon 750G in the A52 5G.
- GPU: It uses Mali-G68 MP5, potentially offering better graphics performance.
- Camera Resolution: The primary camera has a higher resolution (50 MP vs 64 MP). However, the larger sensor size (1/1.56" vs 1/1.7X" in the A52 5G) could mean better overall photo quality.
- Latest Android Version: It comes with Android 13 and One UI 5.1, offering more up-to-date software.
- Bluetooth Version: It supports Bluetooth 5.3, which is a newer version compared to 5.0 in the A52 5G.
- Weight: Although slightly heavier (202g vs 189g), this could be due to its robust build quality and larger battery.
- Antutu Benchmark Score: Higher score in Antutu Benchmark (512020 vs 384321), indicating potentially better overall performance.
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G:
- Screen Size: Slightly larger screen (6.5 inches vs 6.4 inches in the A54 5G), which might be preferable for media consumption.
- Camera Configuration: It features a quad-camera setup, potentially offering more versatility than the triple-camera setup of the A54 5G.
- 3.5mm Jack: It includes a 3.5mm headphone jack, which is missing in the A54 5G.
- Weight: Lighter (189g vs 202g in the A54 5G), which can be more comfortable for long-term use.
- Price: Slightly less expensive (410 EUR vs 400 EUR), offering a better value proposition.
- Fast Charging: Both support fast charging, but the A52 5G is advertised to charge 50% in 30 min.
- Screen-to-Body Ratio: Higher screen-to-body ratio (84.1% vs 82.9%), offering a more immersive display experience.
- Ant+ Support: Includes ANT+ support, which is useful for fitness enthusiasts using ANT+ accessories.
Conclusion:
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G seems to be a more powerful device in terms of performance and battery life, with a more recent Android version and better processing capabilities.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, on the other hand, offers a slightly larger screen, a more versatile camera setup, and additional features like a headphone jack and ANT+ support.
Your choice should depend on what features are more important to you. If performance and battery are your top priorities, the A54 5G seems like the better choice. If you prefer a larger screen and more camera options, consider the A52 5G.
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G or Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
| Brand and model | Samsung Galaxy A54 5G | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G | |
| Rating | (+0) | (+0) | |
| Release date | 2023, March 14 | 2021, March 17 | |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 158.2 x 76.7 x 8.2 mm | 6.23 x 6.23 x 3.02 in | 159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm | 6.3 x 6.3 x 2.96 in | |
| Weight | 202 g | 7.13 oz | 189 g | 6.67 oz | |
| Body Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back | |
| Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
| Colors | Lime, Graphite, Violet, White | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Violet, Awesome Blue | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh, Li-Po, non-removable | 4500 mAh, Li-Po, non-removable | |
| Approximate price | 400 EUR | 410 EUR | |
| Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
| Technology | Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED | |
| Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
| Display colors | 16M | 16M | |
| Screen size | 6.4" in | 6.5" in | |
| Screen area | 100.5 cm2 | 101 cm2 | |
| Screen format | 19.5:9 (height:width) | 20:9 (height:width) | |
| Screen to body ratio | 82.9% | 84,1% | |
| Screen resolution | 1080 x 2340 px | 1080 x 2400 px | |
| Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 403 PPI | 407 PPI | |
| Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | |
| Other specs | - 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) | - 120Hz -800 nits (peak) |
|
| Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
| Rear camera, main | 50 MP, Triple | 64 MP, Quad | |
| Camera specs | -50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS -12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm -5 MP, f/2.4, (macro) |
-64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7X'', 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS -12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm -5 MP, f/2.4, (macro) -5 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
|
| Functions | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR | |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS | |
| DxOMark Main Score | 104 | 102 | |
| DxOMark Photo | 106 | 107 | |
| DxOMark Video | 115 | 90 | |
| Front camera, selfie | 32 MP, Single | 32 MP, Single | |
| Specifications | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8'', 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8'', 0.8µm | |
| Functions | HDR | HDR | |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
Performance
| Operating system - OS | Android 13, One UI 5.1 | Android 11, One UI 3.1 | |
| Chipset | - Exynos 1380 (5 nm) | - Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) | |
| CPU | - Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | - Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) | |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 | Adreno 619 | |
| External memory | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | |
| Internal memory | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
Benchmark
| Antutu 10 Total | 590616 | ||
| Antutu 10 CPU | 191351 | ||
| Antutu 10 GPU | 136765 | ||
| Antutu 10 Mem | 112999 | ||
| Antutu 10 UX | 191351 | ||
| Antutu 9 Total | 512020 | 384321 | |
| GeekBench 6 Single Core | 977 | 762 | |
| GeekBench 6 Multi Core | 2760 | 1869 | |
| GeekBench 6 OpenCL | 3007 | 1183 | |
| GeekBench 6 Vulkan | 3015 | 1150 | |
| GeekBench 5 Single Core | 777 | 584 | |
| GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 2600 | 1771 |
Communication and Connectivity
| SIM card | Single SIM (Nano-SIM, eSIM) or Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Single SIM (Nano-SIM)Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | |
| Network | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | |
| Bands | -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only) -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 -4G - LTE -5G - SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave |
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only) -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 -4G - LTE -5G - SA/NSA |
|
| Speed | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A, 5G | |
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) | |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, USB On-The-Go | |
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE | |
| Harmful irradiation |
SAR - 0.81 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) SAR EU - 0.69 W/kg (head) 1.34 W/kg (body) |
SAR EU - 1.05 W/kg (head) 1.42 W/kg (body) |
Music and Audio
| Radio | No | ||
| Headphone jack | No | Yes | |
| Others |
Other features
| Sensors | - Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (USA only) | - Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | |
| Other extras |
- Fast charging 25W - IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 mins) |
- ANT+ - Fast charging 25W, 50% in 30 min - IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 mins) |
Reviews and Opinions on Samsung Galaxy A54 5G and Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!