Samsung Galaxy F54 vs Samsung Galaxy Note 8 Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1
Samsung Galaxy F54
Smartphone 2
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
Smartphone 3
Samsung Galaxy F54 or Samsung Galaxy Note 8 Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
| Brand and model | Samsung Galaxy F54 | Samsung Galaxy Note 8 | |
| Rating | (+0) | (+0) | |
| Release date | 2023, June 06 | 2017, August | |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 164.9 x 77.3 x 8.4 mm | 6.49 x 6.49 x 3.04 in | 162.5 x 74.8 x 8.6 mm | 6.4 x 6.4 x 2.94 in | |
| Weight | 199 g | 7.02 oz | 195 g | 6.88 oz | |
| Body Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Front/back glass (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | |
| Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
| Colors | Meteor Blue, Stardust Silver | Midnight Black, Maple Gold, Orchid Gray, Deep Sea Blue, Star Pink (Taiwan only) | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh, Li-Po, non-removable | 3300 mAh, Non-removable Li-Ion | |
| Battery life |
Talking time - Up to 22 h (3G) Music play - Up to 74 h |
||
| Approximate price | ₹ 20,39 | 550 EUR | |
| Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
| Technology | Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED | |
| Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
| Display colors | 16M | 16M | |
| Screen size | 6.7" in | 6.3" in | |
| Screen area | 108.4 cm2 | 101.1 cm2 | |
| Screen format | 20:9 (height:width) | 18.5:9 (height:width) | |
| Screen to body ratio | 85.0% | 83.2% | |
| Screen resolution | 1080 x 2400 px | 1440 x 2960 px | |
| Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 393 PPI | 521 PPI | |
| Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | ||
| Other specs | - 120Hz - |
- HDR10 -3D Touch (home button only) -Always-on display |
|
| Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
| Rear camera, main | 108 MP, Triple | 12 MP, Dual | |
| Camera specs | -108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS -8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm -2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) |
-12 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.55'', 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS -12 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.6'', 1.0µm, AF, OIS, 2x optical zoom |
|
| Functions | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama | |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 2160p@30fps, 1080p@60fps, 720p@240fps, HDR, dual-video rec. | |
| DxOMark Main Score | 94 | ||
| DxOMark Photo | 100 | ||
| DxOMark Video | 84 | ||
| Front camera, selfie | 32 MP, Single | 8 MP, Single | |
| Specifications | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 8 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/3.6'', 1.22µm, AF | |
| Functions | Dual video call, Auto-HDR | ||
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps |
Performance
| Operating system - OS | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 5.1 | Android 7.1.1 (Nougat), upgradable to Android 8.0 (Oreo) | |
| Chipset | - Exynos 1380 (5 nm) | - Exynos 8895 Octa (10 nm) - Qualcomm MSM8998 Snapdragon 835 (10 nm) - USA & China |
|
| CPU | - Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | - Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Mongoose M2 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53) - EMEA -Octa-core (4x2.35 GHz Kryo & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo) - USA & China |
|
| GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 | Mali-G71 MP20 - EMEA Adreno 540 - USA & China |
|
| External memory | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSD, up to 512 GB (uses SIM 2 slot) - dual SIM model only | |
| Internal memory | 256GB 8GB RAM | 64/128/256 GB, 6 GB RAM |
Benchmark
| Antutu 9 Total | 507803 | ||
| Antutu 8 Total | 259278 | ||
| Antutu 7 Total | |||
| GeekBench 6 Single Core | 367 | ||
| GeekBench 6 Multi Core | 1327 | ||
| GeekBench 6 OpenCL | 1318 | ||
| GeekBench 6 Vulkan | 554 | ||
| GeekBench 5 Single Core | 789 | 345 | |
| GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 2689 | 1509 | |
| GeekBench 4 Single Core | 1792 | ||
| GeekBench 4 Multi-Core | 6277 | ||
| GeekBench 4 RenderScript | 9051 | ||
| GeekBench 4 Battery | 3822 |
Communication and Connectivity
| SIM card | Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Single SIM (Nano-SIM)Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | |
| Network | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE | |
| Bands | -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 -4G - 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 -5G - 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only) -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 -4G - LTE band 1(2100), 2(1900), 3(1800), 4(1700/2100), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 12(700), 13(700), 17(700), 18(800), 19(800), 20(800), 25(1900), 26(850), 28(700), 32(1500), 38(2600), 39(1900), 40(2300), 41(2500), 66(1700/2100) |
|
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A (5CA) Cat16 1024/150 Mbps | |
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | |
| NFC | Yes | Yes | |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | 3.1, Type-C 1.0 reversible connector | |
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX | |
| Harmful irradiation | SAR - 1.25 W/kg (head) |
Music and Audio
| Radio | No | No | |
| Headphone jack | No | Yes | |
| Others | - 32-bit/384kHz audio -Active noise cancellation with dedicated mic |
Other features
| Sensors | - Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | - Iris scanner, fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, heart rate, SpO2 | |
| Other extras |
- Fast charging 25W |
- Samsung DeX (desktop experience support) -ANT+ -Bixby natural language commands and dictation - Fast battery charging (Quick Charge 2.0) -Qi/PMA wireless charging (market dependent) - Samsung Pay (Visa, MasterCard certified) -IP68 dust/water proof (up to 1.5m for 30 mins) -Stylus |
|
| Versions |
- Versions: N950F (Single SIM: Europe, Australia); N950FD (Global Dual SIM: Europe, LATAM, Brazil; Australia); N950U/U1 (USA); N950W (Canada); N9500 (China); N950N (South Korea) Also known as Samsung Ga |
Reviews and Opinions on Samsung Galaxy F54 and Samsung Galaxy Note 8
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!