Samsung Galaxy J1 (2016) vs Micromax Canvas Mega 4G Q417 Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1
-857.jpg)
Samsung Galaxy J1 (2016)
Smartphone 2
Micromax Canvas Mega 4G Q417
Smartphone 3
Samsung Galaxy J1 (2016) or Micromax Canvas Mega 4G Q417 Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
| Brand and model | Samsung Galaxy J1 (2016) | Micromax Canvas Mega 4G Q417 | |
| Rating | (+0) | (+0) | |
| Release date | 2016, January | 2015, December | |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 132.6 x 69.3 x 8.9 mm | 5.22 x 5.22 x 2.73 in | 146.5 x 74.9 x 8.1 mm | 5.77 x 5.77 x 2.95 in | |
| Weight | 131 g | 4.62 oz | 145 g | 5.11 oz | |
| Body Build | Plastic body | ||
| Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
| Colors | White, Black, Gold | Black | |
| Battery | 2050 mAh, Removable Li-Ion | 2500 mAh, Removable Li-Ion | |
| Battery life |
Talking time - Up to 12 h (3G) Music play - Up to 39 h |
Stand by time - Up to 280 h Talking time - Up to 8 h |
|
| Approximate price | 130 EUR | 150 EUR | |
| Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
| Technology | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD | |
| Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
| Display colors | 16M | 16M | |
| Screen size | 4.5" in | 5.5" in | |
| Screen area | 57.6 cm2 | 83.4 cm2 | |
| Screen format | 5:3 (height:width) | 16:9 (height:width) | |
| Screen to body ratio | 62.7% | 76.0% | |
| Screen resolution | 480 x 800 px | 720 x 1280 px | |
| Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 207 PPI | 267 PPI | |
| Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
| Rear camera, main | 5 MP, Single | 13 MP, Single | |
| Camera specs | -5 MP, AF, f/2.2 | -13 MP, AF | |
| Functions | LED flash | LED flash | |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 1080p@30fps | |
| Front camera, selfie | 2 MP, Single | 5 MP, Single | |
| Specifications | 2 MP, f/2.2 | 5 MP |
Performance
| Operating system - OS | Android 5.1.1 (Lollipop) | Android 5.1 (Lollipop) | |
| Chipset | - Spreadtrum SC9830 | - Mediatek MT6735 (28 nm) | |
| CPU | - Quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 | - Quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A53 | |
| GPU | Mali-400 | Mali-T720MP2 | |
| External memory | microSD, up to 256 GB (dedicated slot) | microSD, up to 32 GB | |
| Internal memory | 8 GB, 1 GB RAM | 16 GB, 3 GB RAM |
Benchmark
| Antutu 7 Total | |||
| GeekBench 5 Single Core | 66 | ||
| GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 127 | ||
| GeekBench 4 Single Core | 374 | ||
| GeekBench 4 Multi-Core | 975 | ||
| GeekBench 4 RenderScript | 683 |
Communication and Connectivity
| SIM card | Single SIM (Micro-SIM)Dual SIM (Micro-SIM, dual stand-by) | Dual SIM (Micro-SIM/ Mini-SIM, dual stand-by) | |
| Network | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE | |
| Bands | -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only) -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - J120F HSDPA 850 / 2100 - J120A -4G - LTE band 1(2100), 3(1800), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 20(800) - J120F LTE band 1(2100), 2(1900), 3(1800), 4(1700/2100), 5(850), 7(2600), 12(700) - J120A |
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 -3G - HSDPA 900 / 2100 -4G - LTE band 3(1800), 5(850), 40(2300) |
|
| Speed | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | |
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, hotspot | |
| GPS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS | Yes, with A-GPS | |
| NFC | |||
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 | |
| Bluetooth | 4.1, A2DP, LE | 4.0, A2DP | |
| Harmful irradiation |
SAR - 1.58 W/kg (head) 1.18 W/kg (body) SAR EU - 0.70 W/kg (head) 0.59 W/kg (body) |
Music and Audio
| Radio | FM radio, RDS, recording | FM radio | |
| Headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
Other features
| Sensors | - Accelerometer, proximity | - Accelerometer, proximity | |
| Other extras | |||
| Versions |
- Versions: J120F (Global); Galaxy Express 3 J120A (AT&T); Galaxy Amp 2 (Cricket); J120H, J120M, J120M, J120T Also known as Samsung Galaxy J1 (2016) Duos with dual-SIM card slots |
Reviews and Opinions on Samsung Galaxy J1 (2016) and Micromax Canvas Mega 4G Q417
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!