Samsung Galaxy J3 (2017) vs Motorola Moto E5 Play Go Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1
Samsung Galaxy J3 (2017)
Smartphone 2
Motorola Moto E5 Play Go
Smartphone 3
Samsung Galaxy J3 (2017) or Motorola Moto E5 Play Go Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
Brand and model | Samsung Galaxy J3 (2017) | Motorola Moto E5 Play Go | |
Rating | (+) | (+) | |
Release date | 2017, June | 2018, July | |
Dimensions (HxWxD) | 143.2 x 70.3 x 8.2 mm | 5.64 x 5.64 x 2.77 in | ||
Weight | 142 g | 5.01 oz | 0 g | 0 oz | |
Body Build | Aluminum body | ||
Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
Colors | White, Black, Gold, Blue | Black, Dark lake, Flash gray | |
Battery | 2400 mAh, Non-removable Li-Ion | 2100 mAh, Li-Ion | |
Battery life |
Talking time - Up to 15 h (3G) Music play - Up to 61 h |
||
Approximate price | 110 EUR | 110 EUR | |
Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
Technology | PLS | IPS LCD | |
Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
Display colors | 16M | 16M | |
Screen size | 5" in | 5.84" in | |
Screen area | 68.9 cm2 | 88.0 cm2 | |
Screen format | 16:9 (height:width) | 18:9 (height:width) | |
Screen to body ratio | 68.5% | ||
Screen resolution | 720 x 1280 px | 480 x 960 px | |
Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 294 PPI | 184 PPI | |
Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
Rear camera, main | 13 MP, Single | 8 MP, Single | |
Camera specs | -13 MP, AF, f/1.9 | -8 MP, f/2.0, 1.12 µm, AF | |
Functions | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR | |
Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps | |
Front camera, selfie | 5 MP, Single | 5 MP, Single | |
Specifications | 5 MP, f/2.2 | 5 MP | |
Functions | LED flash | LED flash |
Performance
Operating system - OS | Android 7.0 (Nougat), upgradable to Android 8.0 (Oreo) | Android 8.0 Oreo (Go edition) | |
Chipset | - Exynos 7570 Quad (14 nm) | - Qualcomm MSM8917 Snapdragon 425 (28 nm) | |
CPU | - Quad-core 1.4 GHz Cortex-A53 | - Quad-core 1.4 GHz Cortex-A53 | |
GPU | Mali-T720 MP2 | Adreno 308 | |
External memory | microSD, up to 256 GB (dedicated slot) | microSD, up to 256 GB | |
Internal memory | 16 GB, 2 GB RAM | 16 GB, 1 GB RAM |
Benchmark
Antutu 7 Total | |||
GeekBench 5 Single Core | 106 | ||
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 356 | ||
GeekBench 4 Single Core | 606 | 648 | |
GeekBench 4 Multi-Core | 1751 | 1821 | |
GeekBench 4 RenderScript | 1109 |
Communication and Connectivity
SIM card | Single SIM (Nano-SIM)Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM | |
Network | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE | |
Bands | -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only) -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 -4G - LTE band 1(2100), 2(1900), 3(1800), 4(1700/2100), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 17(700), 38(2600), 40(2300) |
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 -4G - LTE |
|
Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A (2CA) Cat6 300/50 Mbps | |
GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
Edge | Yes | Yes | |
Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band, WiFi Direct, hotspot | |
GPS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS | |
NFC | Yes (optional) | ||
USB | microUSB 2.0, USB On-The-Go | microUSB 2.0 | |
Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 4.2, A2DP, LE | |
Harmful irradiation |
SAR EU - 0.66 W/kg (head) 1.32 W/kg (body) |
Music and Audio
Radio | FM radio | FM radio | |
Headphone jack | Yes | Yes | |
Others | - Active noise cancellation with dedicated mic | - Active noise cancellation with dedicated mic |
Other features
Sensors | - Accelerometer, proximity | - Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | |
Other extras |
- Splash resistant |
||
Versions |
- Versions: J330F/DS (Global Dual-SIM); J330G/DS (Malaysia) Also known as Samsung Galaxy J3 Pro (2017); Samsung Galaxy J3 (2017) Duos with dual-SIM card slots |
- Also known as Motorola Moto E5 Play Android Go Edition |
Reviews and Opinions on Samsung Galaxy J3 (2017) and Motorola Moto E5 Play Go
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!