Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) vs Oppo R817 Real Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1
-672.jpg)
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017)
Smartphone 2
Oppo R817 Real
Smartphone 3
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) or Oppo R817 Real Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
| Brand and model | Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) | Oppo R817 Real | |
| Rating | (+0) | (+0) | |
| Release date | 2017, June | 2012, October | |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 146.2 x 71.3 x 8 mm | 5.76 x 5.76 x 2.81 in | 123 x 63 x 9.7 mm | 4.84 x 4.84 x 2.48 in | |
| Weight | 160 g | 5.64 oz | 125 g | 4.41 oz | |
| Body Build | Front glass, aluminum body | ||
| Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
| Colors | Blue, Pink, Gold, Black | White, Black | |
| Battery | 3000 mAh, Non-removable Li-Ion | 1710 mAh, Li-Ion | |
| Battery life |
Talking time - Up to 21 h (3G) Music play - Up to 83 h |
Stand by time - Up to 400 h (2G) / Up to 380 h (3G) Talking time - Up to 8 h 40 min (2G) / Up to 8 h (3G) |
|
| Approximate price | 130 EUR | 100 EUR | |
| Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
| Technology | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD | |
| Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
| Display colors | 16M | 16M | |
| Screen size | 5.2" in | 4" in | |
| Screen area | 74.5 cm2 | 45.5 cm2 | |
| Screen format | 16:9 (height:width) | 5:3 (height:width) | |
| Screen to body ratio | 71.5% | 58.8% | |
| Screen resolution | 720 x 1280 px | 480 x 800 px | |
| Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 282 PPI | 233 PPI | |
| Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
| Rear camera, main | 13 MP, Single | 8 MP, Single | |
| Camera specs | -13 MP, f/1.7, 27mm (wide), 1/3.1'', 1.12µm, AF | -8 MP, AF | |
| Functions | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash | |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | Yes | |
| Front camera, selfie | 13 MP, Single | 0.3 MP, Single | |
| Specifications | 13 MP, f/1.9 | VGA | |
| Functions | LED flash |
Performance
| Operating system - OS | Android 7.0 (Nougat), upgradable to Android 8.1 (Oreo) | Android 4.0.4 (Ice Cream Sandwich) | |
| Chipset | - Exynos 7870 Octa (14 nm) | - Mediatek MT6577 (40 nm) | |
| CPU | - Octa-core 1.6 GHz Cortex-A53 | - Dual-core 1.0 GHz Cortex-A9 | |
| GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 | PowerVR SGX531u | |
| External memory | microSD, up to 256 GB (dedicated slot) | microSD, up to 32 GB (dedicated slot) | |
| Internal memory | 16 GB, 2 GB RAM - Global 32 GB, 2 GB RAM - LATAM, SEA 32 GB, 3 GB RAM - Pro edition |
4 GB, 1 GB RAM |
Benchmark
| Antutu 7 Total | |||
| GeekBench 5 Single Core | 118 | ||
| GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 447 | ||
| GeekBench 4 Single Core | 705 | ||
| GeekBench 4 Multi-Core | 3367 | ||
| GeekBench 4 RenderScript | 2268 |
Communication and Connectivity
| SIM card | Single SIM (Nano-SIM)Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Dual SIM (Mini-SIM, dual stand-by) | |
| Network | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA | |
| Bands | -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only) -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 -4G - LTE band 1(2100), 3(1800), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 20(800), 40(2300) |
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
|
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A (2CA) Cat6 300/50 Mbps | HSPA | |
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, WiFi Direct, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, hotspot | |
| GPS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS | Yes, with A-GPS | |
| NFC | Yes | ||
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 | |
| Bluetooth | 4.1, A2DP | Yes | |
| Harmful irradiation |
SAR EU - 0.35 W/kg (head) 1.36 W/kg (body) |
Music and Audio
| Radio | FM radio | No | |
| Headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
Other features
| Sensors | - Fingerprint (front-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | - Accelerometer, proximity | |
| Other extras |
- ANT+ |
||
| Versions |
- Versions: J530F/DS (Global Dual-SIM); J530Y/DS (Malaysia); J530FM/DS (UAE) Also known as Samsung Galaxy J5 Pro (2017) with 32GB/3GB RAM; Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos with dual-SIM card slots |
Reviews and Opinions on Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) and Oppo R817 Real
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!