Samsung Galaxy S24 vs Samsung Galaxy A34 5G Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1
Samsung Galaxy S24
Smartphone 2
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Smartphone 3
Differences between Samsung Galaxy S24 and Samsung Galaxy A34 5G - Which to Choose?
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy S24:
- Newer model with a release date in 2024, potentially offering more updated features and software support.
- Better performance with a higher Antutu v10 total score (indicating superior CPU, GPU, memory, and UX performance).
- More advanced GPU options, including Adreno 750 and Xclipse 940, depending on the market.
- Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X display which is typically more power-efficient and can dynamically adjust refresh rates.
- Support for MMWave 5G technology, providing faster 5G speeds where available, especially in the USA.
- Higher resolution main camera at 50 MP and more sophisticated camera features such as 8K video recording.
- More premium build materials, featuring Gorilla Glass Victus 2 and Armor aluminum frame.
- Additional features like Samsung DeX for desktop experience support.
- Stereo sound recording and playback tuned by AKG for better audio quality.
- IP68 dust/water resistant rating, indicating better protection against the elements.
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy A34 5G:
- Released a year earlier and might offer better availability and market-proven reliability.
- Larger battery capacity at 5000 mAh, which could translate to longer battery life depending on usage patterns.
- MicroSDXC card slot available for expandable storage, in contrast with the Galaxy S24 which does not support memory cards.
- Lower price point, offering a more budget-friendly option with good performance for its class.
- Slightly larger screen size of 6.6 inches compared to the 6.2 inches of the Galaxy S24, which some users might prefer for media consumption and gaming.
- IP67 dust/water resistant rating providing solid protection against the elements.
- Might be lighter than the S24 due to different build materials, which can be an advantage for portability.
Samsung Galaxy S24 or Samsung Galaxy A34 5G Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
| Brand and model | Samsung Galaxy S24 | Samsung Galaxy A34 5G | |
| Rating | (+0) | (+0) | |
| Release date | 2024, January 17 | 2023, March 14 | |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 147 x 70.6 x 7.6 mm | 5.79 x 5.79 x 2.78 in | 161.3 x 78.1 x 8.2 mm | 6.35 x 6.35 x 3.07 in | |
| Weight | 167 g | 5.89 oz | 199 g | 7.02 oz | |
| Body Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back | |
| Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
| Colors | Onyx Black, Marble Grey, Cobalt Violet, Amber Yellow, Jade Green, Sandstone Orange, Sapphire Blue | Lime, Graphite, Violet, Silver | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh, Li-Ion, non-removable | 5000 mAh, Li-Po, non-removable | |
| Approximate price | € 648.4 | 389 EUR | |
| Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
| Technology | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | Super AMOLED | |
| Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
| Display colors | 16M | 16M | |
| Screen size | 6.2" in | 6.6" in | |
| Screen area | 94.4 cm2 | 106.9 cm2 | |
| Screen format | 19.5:9 (height:width) | 19.5:9 (height:width) | |
| Screen to body ratio | 90.9% | 84.9% | |
| Screen resolution | 1080 x 2340 px | 1080 x 2340 px | |
| Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 416 PPI | 390 PPI | |
| Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | |
| Other specs | - 120Hz, HDR10+, 2600 nits (peak) -Always-on display |
- 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) | |
| Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
| Rear camera, main | 50 MP, Triple | 48 MP, Triple | |
| Camera specs | -50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS -10 MP, f/2.4, 67mm (telephoto), 1/3.94", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom -12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.55" 1.4µm, Super Steady video |
-48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0'', 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS -8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0'', 1.12µm -5 MP, f/2.4, (macro) |
|
| Functions | LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR | |
| Video | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, HDR10+, stereo sound rec., gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps | |
| DxOMark Main Score | 133 | 92 | |
| DxOMark Photo | 134 | 99 | |
| DxOMark Video | 125 | 78 | |
| Front camera, selfie | 12 MP, Single | 13 MP, Single | |
| Specifications | 12 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), dual pixel PDAF | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1'', 1.12µm | |
| Functions | HDR, HDR10+ | ||
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
Performance
| Operating system - OS | Android 14, up to 7 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1.1 | Android 13, One UI 5.1 | |
| Chipset | - Qualcomm SM8650-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) - Exynos 2400 (4 nm) - International |
- Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) | |
| CPU | - 8-core (1x3.39GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.1GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.9GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.2GHz Cortex-A520) -10-core (1x3.2GHz Cortex-X4 & 2x2.9GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.6GHz Cortex-A720 & 4x1.95GHz Cortex-A520) |
- Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | |
| GPU | Adreno 750 (1 GHz) - USA/Canada/China Xclipse 940 - International |
Mali-G68 MC4 | |
| External memory | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | |
| Internal memory | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
Benchmark
| Antutu 10 Total | 1733431 | 556613 | |
| Antutu 10 CPU | 421508 | 172806 | |
| Antutu 10 GPU | 669480 | 116205 | |
| Antutu 10 Mem | 321991 | 115870 | |
| Antutu 10 UX | 421508 | 172806 | |
| Antutu 9 Total | 473852 | ||
| GeekBench 6 Single Core | 2198 | ||
| GeekBench 6 Multi Core | 6922 | ||
| GeekBench 5 Single Core | 780 | ||
| GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 2341 |
Communication and Connectivity
| SIM card | Nano-SIM and eSIM/ Dual eSIM or Dual SIM (2 Nano-SIMs and eSIM, dual stand-by) | Single SIM (Nano-SIM)Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | |
| Network | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | |
| Bands | -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (Dual SIM model only) CDMA 800 / 1900 & TD-SCDMA -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 CDMA2000 1xEV-DO -4G - 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International -5G - 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA |
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only) -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 -4G - LTE -5G - SA/NSA/Sub6 |
|
| Speed | HSPA, LTE (up to 7CA), 5G | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G | |
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) | |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, DisplayPort 1.2, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | |
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE | |
| Harmful irradiation |
SAR - 1.23 W/kg (head) 1.10 W/kg (body) SAR EU - 0.87 W/kg (head) 1.35 W/kg (body) |
SAR EU - 0.55 W/kg (head) 1.49 W/kg (body) |
Music and Audio
| Radio | No | No | |
| Headphone jack | No | No | |
| Others | - 32-bit/384kHz audio -Tuned by AKG |
Other features
| Sensors | - Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | - Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity | |
| Other extras |
- Samsung DeX, Samsung Wireless DeX (desktop experience support) -Circle to Search - 25W Fast charging, Power Delivery 3.0, 50% in 30 min -15W Wireless charging (Qi/PMA) -4.5W Reverse wireless charging - IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) -Armor aluminum 2 frame with tougher drop and scratch resistance |
- Fast charging 25W - IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 mins) |
Reviews and Opinions on Samsung Galaxy S24 and Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!