Samsung Galaxy S5 mini vs Samsung Propel Pro Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1
Samsung Galaxy S5 mini
Smartphone 2
Samsung Propel Pro
Smartphone 3
Samsung Galaxy S5 mini or Samsung Propel Pro Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
| Brand and model | Samsung Galaxy S5 mini | Samsung Propel Pro | |
| Rating | (+) | (+) | |
| Release date | 2014, June | 2009, March | |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 131.1 x 64.8 x 9.1 mm | 5.16 x 5.16 x 2.55 in | 99 x 60 x 15 mm | 3.9 x 3.9 x 2.36 in | |
| Weight | 120 g | 4.23 oz | 137 g | 4.83 oz | |
| Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
| Colors | Charcoal Black, Shimmery White, Electric Blue and Copper Gold | Grey | |
| Battery | 2100 mAh, Removable Li-Ion | 1000 mAh, Removable Li-Ion | |
| Battery life |
Talking time - Up to 10 h (3G) Music play - Up to 47 h |
Stand by time - Up to 288 h Talking time - Up to 6 h 30 min |
|
| Keyboard | QWERTY | ||
| Approximate price | 220 EUR | 80 EUR | |
| Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
| Technology | Super AMOLED | TFT | |
| Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | ||
| Display colors | 16M | 65K | |
| Screen size | 4.5" in | 2.55" in | |
| Screen area | 55.8 cm2 | 21.0 cm2 | |
| Screen format | 16:9 (height:width) | 1:1 (height:width) | |
| Screen to body ratio | 65.7% | 35.3% | |
| Screen resolution | 720 x 1280 px | 320 x 320 px | |
| Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 326 PPI | 177 PPI | |
| Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
| Rear camera, main | 8 MP, Single | 3 MP, Single | |
| Camera specs | -8 MP, f/2.4, 31mm (standard), AF | -3 MP, AF | |
| Functions | LED flash, HDR, panorama | ||
| Video | 1080p@30fps | Yes | |
| Front camera, selfie | 2.1 MP, Single | 0 MP, | |
| Specifications | 2.1 MP | ||
| Video | 1080p@30fps |
Performance
| Operating system - OS | Android 4.4.2 (KitKat), upgradable to 5.1.1 (Lollipop); TouchWiz UI | Microsoft Windows Mobile 6.1 Standard | |
| Chipset | - Exynos 3470 Quad | ||
| CPU | - Quad-core 1.4 GHz Cortex-A7 | - 528 MHz | |
| GPU | Mali-400MP4 | ||
| External memory | microSD, up to 64 GB (dedicated slot) | microSD, up to 16 GB (dedicated slot) | |
| Internal memory | 16 GB, 1.5 GB RAM | 128 MB RAM, 256 MB ROM |
Benchmark
| Antutu 7 Total | |||
| GeekBench 5 Single Core | 73 | ||
| GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 243 | ||
| GeekBench 4 Single Core | 414 | ||
| GeekBench 4 Multi-Core | 1122 | ||
| GeekBench 4 RenderScript | 743 | ||
| GeekBench 4 Battery | 1032 |
Communication and Connectivity
| SIM card | Micro-SIM | Mini-SIM | |
| Network | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA | |
| Bands | -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 -4G - LTE band 1(2100), 3(1800), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 20(800) - G800F LTE band 2(1900), 4(1700/2100), 5(850), 12(700), 17(700) - G800R4 LTE band 1(2100), 3(1800), 7(2600), 28(700) - G800Y |
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
|
| Speed | HSPA 42.2(LTE)/21.1(3G)/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA 3.6/0.384 Mbps | |
| GPRS | Yes | Class 10 | |
| Edge | Yes | Class 10 | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g | |
| GPS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS | Yes, with A-GPS | |
| NFC | Yes (LTE model only) | ||
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | Proprietary | |
| Bluetooth | 4.0, A2DP, EDR, LE, aptX | 2.0, A2DP | |
| Harmful irradiation |
SAR - 0.63 W/kg (head) 0.82 W/kg (body) SAR EU - 0.97 W/kg (head) 0.56 W/kg (body) |
SAR - 0.40 W/kg (head) 0.59 W/kg (body) |
Music and Audio
| Radio | No | No | |
| Headphone jack | Yes | No |
Other features
| Sensors | - Fingerprint (front-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, heart rate , Infrared port | ||
| Other extras |
- IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 mins) |
- Pocket Office -MP4 player -MP3 player -Organizer -Voice memo -Predictive text input --Trackball |
|
| Versions |
- Versions: G800F (Europe); G800A (AT&T); G800HQ (Turkey); G800H (USA); G800M (LATAM); G800R4 (US Cellular); G800Y (New Zealand) |
- For AT&T |
Reviews and Opinions on Samsung Galaxy S5 mini and Samsung Propel Pro
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!
