Samsung Galaxy Xcover 5 vs Motorola Moto G7 Play Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 5
Smartphone 2
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Smartphone 3
Differences between Samsung Galaxy Xcover 5 and Motorola Moto G7 Play - Which to Choose?
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy Xcover 5:
- Released more recently in 2021, compared to 2019 for the Moto G7 Play.
- Equipped with a modern Exynos 850 chipset, which might be more efficient due to the newer 8nm process technology.
- Offers a military standard durability (MIL-STD-810H compliant) and IP68 dust/water resistance, making it more robust for outdoor and rough environments.
- Bluetooth 5.0 support, which could mean better connectivity and range compared to Bluetooth 4.2 on the Moto G7 Play.
- Comes with 64GB base internal storage and 4GB RAM, which is double the amount offered by the Moto G7 Play.
- A slightly higher resolution on the main camera at 16 MP, compared to the 13 MP on the Moto G7 Play.
- Supports fast battery charging at 15W.
Reasons to consider the Motorola Moto G7 Play:
- Lighter weight at 149 grams compared to 172 grams for the Galaxy Xcover 5.
- Larger screen size of 5.7 inches over the 5.3 inches of the Galaxy Xcover 5.
- Higher screen-to-body ratio which might offer a more immersive viewing experience.
- The Moto G7 Play has a slightly higher screen resolution leading to a marginally higher pixel density.
- The main camera is capable of recording video at a higher resolution of 2160p, compared to 1080p on the Galaxy Xcover 5.
- The Moto G7 Play includes an FM radio feature.
- More affordable price at 150 EUR, which is significantly lower than the 280 EUR price tag of the Galaxy Xcover 5.
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 5 or Motorola Moto G7 Play Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
| Brand and model | Samsung Galaxy Xcover 5 | Motorola Moto G7 Play | |
| Rating | (+0) | (+0) | |
| Release date | 2021, March 04 | 2019, February | |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 147.1 x 71.6 x 9.2 mm | 5.79 x 5.79 x 2.82 in | 147.3 x 71.5 x 8 mm | 5.8 x 5.8 x 2.81 in | |
| Weight | 172 g | 6.07 oz | 149 g | 5.26 oz | |
| Body Build | Front glass, plastic back | ||
| Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
| Colors | Black | Deep indigo, Fine Gold, Starry Black | |
| Battery | 3000 mAh, Li-Ion, removable | 3000 mAh, Non-removable Li-Ion | |
| Approximate price | 280 EUR | 150 EUR | |
| Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
| Technology | PLS IPS | IPS LCD | |
| Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
| Display colors | 16M | 16M | |
| Screen size | 5.3" in | 5.7" in | |
| Screen area | 67.8 cm2 | 81.4 cm2 | |
| Screen format | 18.5:9 (height:width) | 19:9 (height:width) | |
| Screen to body ratio | 71.3% | 77.3% | |
| Screen resolution | 720 x 1480 px | 720 x 1512 px | |
| Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 311 PPI | 294 PPI | |
| Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 (market dependent) | ||
| Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
| Rear camera, main | 16 MP, Single | 13 MP, Single | |
| Camera specs | -16 MP, f/1.8, PDAF | -13 MP, f/2.0, 1.12um, PDAF | |
| Functions | Dual LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR | |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 2160p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | |
| Front camera, selfie | 5 MP, Single | 8 MP, Single | |
| Specifications | 5 MP, f/2.2 | 8 MP, f/2.2, 1.12um | |
| Functions | LED flash | ||
| Video | 1080p@30fps |
Performance
| Operating system - OS | Android 11, One UI 2.0 | Android 9.0 (Pie) | |
| Chipset | - Exynos 850 (8nm) | - Qualcomm SDM632 Snapdragon 632 (14 nm) | |
| CPU | - Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | - Octa-core (4x1.8 GHz Kryo 250 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 250 Silver) | |
| GPU | Mali-G52 | Adreno 506 | |
| External memory | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSD, up to 512 GB (dedicated slot) | |
| Internal memory | 64GB 4GB RAM | 32 GB, 2 GB RAM |
Benchmark
| Antutu 8 Total | 117907 | ||
| Antutu 7 Total | |||
| GeekBench 5 Single Core | 180 | ||
| GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 1111 | ||
| GeekBench 4 Single Core | 1173 | ||
| GeekBench 4 Multi-Core | 4090 |
Communication and Connectivity
| SIM card | Single SIM (Nano-SIM)Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Single SIM (Nano-SIM)Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | |
| Network | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE | |
| Bands | -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (Dual SIM model only) -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 -4G - LTE |
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only) -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 -4G - LTE band 1(2100), 2(1900), 3(1800), 4(1700/2100), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 20(800), 28(700), 38(2600), 40(2300), 41(2500) - Europe LTE band 1(2100), 2(1900), 3(1800), 4(1700/2100), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 12(700), 13(700), 14(700), 17(700), 20(800), 25(1900), 26(850), 29(700), 30(2300), 38(2600), 39(1900), 40(2300), 41(2500), 41(2500), 66(1700/2100), 71(600) - USA |
|
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A (2CA) Cat7 300/50 Mbps | |
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, hotspot | |
| GPS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS | |
| NFC | Yes | ||
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, charging connector pins | 2.0, Type-C 1.0 reversible connector, USB On-The-Go | |
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 4.2, A2DP, LE | |
| Harmful irradiation |
SAR EU - 0.70 W/kg (head) 1.27 W/kg (body) |
Music and Audio
| Radio | FM radio | ||
| Headphone jack | Yes | Yes | |
| Others | - Active noise cancellation with dedicated mic |
Other features
| Sensors | - Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | - Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | |
| Other extras |
- Fast battery charging 15W - IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins) -MIL-STD-810H compliant |
- Splash resistant (market dependent) |
|
| Versions |
- For Europe, USA, other countries. |
Reviews and Opinions on Samsung Galaxy Xcover 5 and Motorola Moto G7 Play
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!