Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
Smartphone 2
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Smartphone 3
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 or Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
| Brand and model | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G | |
| Rating | (+) | (+) | |
| Release date | 2022, August 25 | 2023, September 21 | |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 165.2 x 71.9 x 6.9 mm | 6.5 x 6.5 x 2.83 in | 161.2 x 74.2 x 8 mm | 6.35 x 6.35 x 2.92 in | |
| Weight | 187 g | 6.6 oz | 187 g | 6.6 oz | |
| Body Build | Plastic front (opened), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus+), aluminum frame | Corning Gorilla Glass | |
| Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
| Colors | Bora Purple, Graphite, Pink Gold, Blue, Yellow, White, Navy, Khaki, Red | Midnight Black, Aurora Purple (Coral Purple), Ocean Teal, Arctic White | |
| Battery | 3700 mAh, Li-Po, non-removable | 5100 mAh, Li-Po, non-removable | |
| Approximate price | 1100 EUR | 320 EUR | |
| Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
| Technology | Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X | AMOLED | |
| Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
| Display colors | 16M | 68B | |
| Screen size | 6.7" in | 6.67" in | |
| Screen area | 101.5 cm2 | 107.4 cm2 | |
| Screen format | 20:9 (height:width) | ||
| Screen to body ratio | 85.4% | 89.7% | |
| Screen resolution | 1080 x 2640 px | 1220 x 2712 px | |
| Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 426 PPI | 446 PPI | |
| Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | ||
| Other specs | - 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) -Cover display: -Super AMOLED, 1.9 inches, 260 x 512 pixels (Gorilla Glass Victus+) |
- 120Hz, Dolby Vision, 500 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) -Always-on display |
|
| Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
| Rear camera, main | 12 MP, Dual | 200 MP, Triple | |
| Camera specs | -12 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.76", 1.8µm, Dual Pixel PDAF, OIS -12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
-200 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS -8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide) -2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) |
|
| Functions | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@60/240fps, 720p@960fps, HDR10+ | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | |
| DxOMark Main Score | 112 | ||
| DxOMark Photo | 125 | ||
| DxOMark Video | 113 | ||
| Front camera, selfie | 10 MP, Single | 16 MP, Single | |
| Specifications | 10 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1.22µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | |
| Functions | HDR | HDR | |
| Video | 4K@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
Performance
| Operating system - OS | Android 12, One UI 4.1 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, HyperOS | |
| Chipset | - Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | - Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm) | |
| CPU | - Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | - Octa-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) | |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 710 | |
| External memory | No | No | |
| Internal memory | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
Benchmark
| Antutu 10 Total | 590741 | ||
| Antutu 10 CPU | 187412 | ||
| Antutu 10 GPU | 119632 | ||
| Antutu 10 Mem | 133411 | ||
| Antutu 10 UX | 187412 | ||
| Antutu 9 Total | 986349 | ||
| GeekBench 6 Single Core | 1451 | ||
| GeekBench 6 Multi Core | 3843 | ||
| GeekBench 6 OpenCL | 5025 | ||
| GeekBench 6 Vulkan | 5776 | ||
| GeekBench 5 Single Core | 1115 | 1012 | |
| GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 3594 | 2943 |
Communication and Connectivity
| SIM card | Nano-SIM, eSIM | Nano-SIM, eSIM or Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | |
| Network | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | |
| Bands | -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 CDMA 800 / 1900 -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 CDMA2000 1xEV-DO -4G - LTE -5G - SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave |
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 CDMA 800 -3G - HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 - India CDMA2000 1x -4G - 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 - India 1, 3, 5, 8, 19, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - China -5G - 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - India 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China |
|
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A (6CA), 5G | HSPA, LTE-A (CA), 5G | |
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | |
| GPS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO, QZSS | |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) | |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, USB On-The-Go | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | |
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE | |
| Harmful irradiation |
SAR - 1.02 W/kg (head) 0.94 W/kg (body) SAR EU - 1.15 W/kg (head) 1.20 W/kg (body) |
Music and Audio
| Radio | No | No | |
| Headphone jack | No | Yes | |
| Others | - 32-bit/384kHz audio -Tuned by AKG |
- 24-bit/192kHz Hi-Res & Hi-Res wireless audio |
Other features
| Sensors | - Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | - Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity , Infrared port | |
| Other extras |
- Samsung Pay (Visa, MasterCard certified) - Fast charging 25W, 50% in 30 min -Fast wireless charging 15W -Reverse wireless charging 4.5W - Folded: 84.9 x 71.9 x 15.9 mm -IPX8 water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins) -Armor aluminum frame with tougher drop and scratch resistance |
- 67W Fast charging, Power Delivery 3.0, 50% in 17 min, 100% in 44 min - IP54, dust and splash resistant |
Reviews and Opinions on Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!