Samsung I9305 Galaxy S III vs Samsung Galaxy S Blaze 4G T769 Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1
Samsung I9305 Galaxy S III
Smartphone 2
Samsung Galaxy S Blaze 4G T769
Smartphone 3
Samsung I9305 Galaxy S III or Samsung Galaxy S Blaze 4G T769 Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
| Brand and model | Samsung I9305 Galaxy S III | Samsung Galaxy S Blaze 4G T769 | |
| Rating | (+0) | (+0) | |
| Release date | 2012, September | 2012, January | |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 136.6 x 70.6 x 8.6 mm | 5.38 x 5.38 x 2.78 in | 121.9 x 63 x 11.2 mm | 4.8 x 4.8 x 2.48 in | |
| Weight | 131 g | 4.62 oz | 127.6 g | 4.5 oz | |
| Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
| Colors | Titanium Gray, Sapphire Black | Black | |
| Battery | 2100 mAh, Removable Li-Ion | 1750 mAh, Removable Li-Ion | |
| Battery life |
Stand by time - Up to 580 h (2G) / Up to 390 h (LTE)/ 510 h (3G) Talking time - Up to 16 h (2G) / Up to 11 h (3G) |
Stand by time - Up to 230 h Talking time - Up to 7 h |
|
| Approximate price | 320 EUR | 140 EUR | |
| Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
| Technology | Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED | |
| Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
| Display colors | 16M | 16M | |
| Screen size | 4.8" in | 3.97" in | |
| Screen area | 63.5 cm2 | 44.9 cm2 | |
| Screen format | 16:9 (height:width) | 5:3 (height:width) | |
| Screen to body ratio | 65.9% | 58.4% | |
| Screen resolution | 720 x 1280 px | 480 x 800 px | |
| Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 306 PPI | 235 PPI | |
| Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 2 | ||
| Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
| Rear camera, main | 8 MP, Single | 5 MP, Single | |
| Camera specs | -8 MP, f/2.6, 1/3'', AF | -5 MP, AF | |
| Functions | LED flash | LED flash | |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 720p@30fps | |
| Front camera, selfie | 1.9 MP, Single | 1.3 MP, Single | |
| Specifications | 1.9 MP, f/2.6 | 1.3 MP | |
| Video | 720p@30fps |
Performance
| Operating system - OS | Android 4.1.1 (Jelly Bean), 4.3 (Jelly Bean), upgradable to 4.4.4 (KitKat); TouchWiz UI | Android 2.3.6 (Gingerbread) | |
| Chipset | - Exynos 4412 Quad (32 nm) | - Qualcomm MSM8260 Snapdragon S3 | |
| CPU | - Quad-core 1.4 GHz Cortex-A9 | - Dual-core 1.5 GHz Scorpion | |
| GPU | Mali-400MP4 | Adreno 220 | |
| External memory | microSD, up to 64 GB (dedicated slot) | microSD, up to 32 GB (dedicated slot), 4 GB included | |
| Internal memory | 16 GB, 2 GB RAM | 3 GB internal, 1 GB RAM |
Benchmark
| Antutu 7 Total | |||
| GeekBench 4 Multi-Core | 1253 |
Communication and Connectivity
| SIM card | Micro-SIM | Mini-SIM | |
| Network | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA | |
| Bands | -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 -4G - LTE band 3(1800), 7(2600), 20(800) |
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
|
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat3 100/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps | |
| GPRS | Class 12 | Yes | |
| Edge | Class 12 | Yes | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA, hotspot | |
| GPS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS | Yes, with A-GPS | |
| NFC | Yes | Yes | |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 (MHL TV-out), USB Host | microUSB 2.0 | |
| Bluetooth | 4.0, A2DP, EDR, aptX | 3.0, A2DP | |
| Harmful irradiation |
SAR - 0.41 W/kg (head) 0.87 W/kg (body) SAR EU - 0.24 W/kg (head) |
SAR - 0.69 W/kg (head) |
Music and Audio
| Radio | No | No | |
| Headphone jack | Yes | Yes | |
| Others | - Active noise cancellation with dedicated mic | - Active noise cancellation with dedicated mic |
Other features
| Sensors | - Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | - Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | |
| Other extras |
- ANT+ -S-Voice natural language commands and dictation |
- MP4/DivX/XviD/WMV/H.264 player -MP3/WAV/eAAC+/FLAC player -Photo/video editor -Document editor |
|
| Versions |
- Also known as Samsung GALAXY S III LTE |
- For T-Mobile |
Reviews and Opinions on Samsung I9305 Galaxy S III and Samsung Galaxy S Blaze 4G T769
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!