Sharp Aquos R2 vs Sharp Aquos R5G Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1
Sharp Aquos R2
Smartphone 2
Sharp Aquos R5G
Smartphone 3
Sharp Aquos R2 or Sharp Aquos R5G Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
| Brand and model | Sharp Aquos R2 | Sharp Aquos R5G | |
| Rating | (+) | (+) | |
| Release date | 2018, May | 2020, February | |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 156 x 74 x 9 mm | 6.14 x 6.14 x 2.91 in | 162 x 75 x 8.9 mm | 6.38 x 6.38 x 2.95 in | |
| Weight | 181 g | 6.38 oz | 189 g | 6.67 oz | |
| Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
| Colors | Black, White | Glare Black, Aurora White | |
| Battery | 3130 mAh, Non-removable Li-Ion | 3730 mAh, Li-Ion, non-removable | |
| Approximate price | 350 EUR | 700 EUR | |
| Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
| Technology | IGZO IPS LCD | IGZO IPS LCD | |
| Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
| Display colors | 16M | 1B | |
| Screen size | 6" in | 6.4" in | |
| Screen area | 89.9 cm2 | 99.5 cm2 | |
| Screen format | 19:9 (height:width) | ||
| Screen to body ratio | 77.8% | 81.9% | |
| Screen resolution | 1440 x 3040 px | 1440 x 3168 px | |
| Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 561 PPI | 0 PPI | |
| Other specs | - 120Hz -Dolby Vision |
||
| Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
| Rear camera, main | 22.6 MP, Dual | 12 MP, Quad | |
| Camera specs | -22.6 MP, PDAF -16.3 MP, PDAF (for video recording only) |
-12 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1.4µm, Dual Pixel OIS -12 MP, f/2.7, 52mm (telephoto), 52mm, 1.0µm, OIS -48 MP, f/2.9, 19mm (ultrawide), 0.8µm, EIS -TOF 3D (depth) |
|
| Functions | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama | |
| Video | 2160p@30fps (dedicated video camera) | 8K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | |
| Front camera, selfie | 16.3 MP, Single | 16 MP, Single | |
| Specifications | 16.3 MP | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm | |
| Video | 1080p@30fps |
Performance
| Operating system - OS | Android 8.0 (Oreo) | Android 10 | |
| Chipset | - Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 (10 nm) | - Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) | |
| CPU | - Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Kryo 385 Gold & 4x1.7 GHz Kryo 385 Silver) | - Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | |
| GPU | Adreno 630 | Adreno 650 | |
| External memory | microSD, up to 512 GB (uses SIM 2 slot) | No | |
| Internal memory | 64 GB, 4 GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM |
Benchmark
| Antutu 10 Total | 770966 | ||
| Antutu 10 CPU | 230037 | ||
| Antutu 10 GPU | 188543 | ||
| Antutu 10 Mem | 150871 | ||
| Antutu 10 UX | 230037 | ||
| Antutu 9 Total | 568446 | ||
| Antutu 8 Total | 265822 |
Communication and Connectivity
| SIM card | Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM | |
| Network | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | |
| Bands | -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 -4G - LTE |
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 -4G - 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41 -5G - 1, 3, 28, 78 |
|
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A | |
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, WiFi Direct, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | |
| GPS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS | Yes, with dual-band A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | |
| NFC | Yes | ||
| USB | 2.0, Type-C 1.0 reversible connector | USB Type-C 3.1 | |
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
Music and Audio
| Radio | No | No | |
| Headphone jack | Yes | No | |
| Others | - Active noise cancellation with dedicated mic -Dolby Vision & Dolby Atmos |
- 24-bit/192kHz audio |
Other features
| Sensors | - Fingerprint (front-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | - Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | |
| Other extras |
- Fast battery charging - IPX5/IPX8/IP6X |
- IPX5/IP6X/IPX8 water/dust resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins) |
Reviews and Opinions on Sharp Aquos R2 and Sharp Aquos R5G
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!
