Sharp Aquos R5G vs Sharp Aquos V Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1
Sharp Aquos R5G
Smartphone 2
Sharp Aquos V
Smartphone 3
Sharp Aquos R5G or Sharp Aquos V Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
| Brand and model | Sharp Aquos R5G | Sharp Aquos V | |
| Rating | (+0) | (+0) | |
| Release date | 2020, February | 2019, November | |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 162 x 75 x 8.9 mm | 6.38 x 6.38 x 2.95 in | 157 x 76 x 9 mm | 6.18 x 6.18 x 2.99 in | |
| Weight | 189 g | 6.67 oz | 173 g | 6.1 oz | |
| Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
| Colors | Glare Black, Aurora White | Black | |
| Battery | 3730 mAh, Li-Ion, non-removable | 3090 mAh, Non-removable Li-Ion | |
| Approximate price | 700 EUR | 210 EUR | |
| Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
| Technology | IGZO IPS LCD | IPS LCD | |
| Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
| Display colors | 1B | 16M | |
| Screen size | 6.4" in | 5.9" in | |
| Screen area | 99.5 cm2 | 89.8 cm2 | |
| Screen format | 18:9 (height:width) | ||
| Screen to body ratio | 81.9% | 75.3% | |
| Screen resolution | 1440 x 3168 px | 1080 x 2160 px | |
| Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 0 PPI | 409 PPI | |
| Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | ||
| Other specs | - 120Hz -Dolby Vision |
||
| Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
| Rear camera, main | 12 MP, Quad | 13 MP, Dual | |
| Camera specs | -12 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1.4µm, Dual Pixel OIS -12 MP, f/2.7, 52mm (telephoto), 52mm, 1.0µm, OIS -48 MP, f/2.9, 19mm (ultrawide), 0.8µm, EIS -TOF 3D (depth) |
-13 MP, f/2.0, PDAF, OIS -13 MP B/W |
|
| Functions | LED flash, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama | |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 2160p@30fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) | |
| Front camera, selfie | 16 MP, Single | 8 MP, Single | |
| Specifications | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm | 8 MP, f/2.0 | |
| Functions | HDR | ||
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) |
Performance
| Operating system - OS | Android 10 | Android 9.0 (Pie) | |
| Chipset | - Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) | - Qualcomm MSM8998 Snapdragon 835 (10 nm) | |
| CPU | - Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | - Octa-core (4x2.35 GHz Kryo & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo) | |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 540 | |
| External memory | No | microSD, up to 256 GB (uses shared SIM slot) | |
| Internal memory | 256GB 12GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM |
Benchmark
| Antutu 10 Total | 770966 | ||
| Antutu 10 CPU | 230037 | ||
| Antutu 10 GPU | 188543 | ||
| Antutu 10 Mem | 150871 | ||
| Antutu 10 UX | 230037 | ||
| Antutu 9 Total | 568446 |
Communication and Connectivity
| SIM card | Nano-SIM | Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | |
| Network | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE | |
| Bands | -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 -4G - 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41 -5G - 1, 3, 28, 78 |
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 -4G - LTE (unspecified) |
|
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A (2CA) Cat9 450/50 Mbps | |
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | |
| GPS | Yes, with dual-band A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS | |
| NFC | Yes | ||
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | 2.0, Type-C 1.0 reversible connector | |
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
Music and Audio
| Radio | No | No | |
| Headphone jack | No | Yes | |
| Others | - 24-bit/192kHz audio | - Active noise cancellation with dedicated mic |
Other features
| Sensors | - Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | - Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | |
| Other extras |
- IPX5/IP6X/IPX8 water/dust resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins) |
Reviews and Opinions on Sharp Aquos R5G and Sharp Aquos V
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!