Sharp Aquos Zero vs Sharp Aquos S2 Comparison and Differences

Smartphone 1

Sharp Aquos Zero

Sharp Aquos Zero

Smartphone 2

Sharp Aquos S2

Sharp Aquos S2

Smartphone 3

Sharp Aquos Zero or Sharp Aquos S2 Specs Comparison

or

Common specs

Brand and model Sharp Aquos Zero Sharp Aquos S2
Rating (+0) (+0)
Release date 2019, January 2017, August
Dimensions (HxWxD) 154 x 73 x 8.8 mm | 6.06 x 6.06 x 2.87 in 141.8 x 72 x 7.9 mm | 5.58 x 5.58 x 2.83 in
Weight 146 g | 5.15 oz 140 g | 4.94 oz
Body Build Front glass, aluminum frame Front/back glass, aluminum frame
Case buy from Amazon

buy from Amazon

Colors Meteorite Black White, Black, Blue, Green
Battery 3130 mAh,  Non-removable Li-Ion 3020 mAh,  Non-removable Li-Po
Approximate price 600 EUR 450 EUR
Check price from Amazon

from Amazon

Screen

Technology OLED IPS LCD
Touchscreen capacitive touchscreen capacitive touchscreen
Display colors 16M 16M
Screen size 6.2" in 5.5" in
Screen area 96.9 cm2 80.7 cm2
Screen format 18.7:9 (height:width) 17:9 (height:width)
Screen to body ratio 86.2% 79.0%
Screen resolution 1440 x 2992 px 1080 x 2040 px
Screen PPI /points per inch/ 536 PPI 420 PPI
Screen protection Corning Gorilla Glass 5 Corning Gorilla Glass (unspecified version)
Other specs - DCI-P3
-HDR 10
-Dolby Vision
Screen protector buy from Amazon buy from Amazon

Camera and Video

Rear camera, main 22.6 MP, Single 12 MP, Dual
Camera specs -22.6 MP, f/1.9, 22 mm, PDAF, OIS -12 MP, f/1.8, 1/2.55'', 1/3.2'', 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF
-8 MP
Functions LED flash, HDR, panorama Dual-LED dual-tone flash, panorama, HDR
Video 2160p@30fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) 1080p@30fps
Front camera, selfie 8 MP, Single 8 MP, Single
Specifications 8 MP, f/2.2, 23 mm 8 MP, f/2.0, 1/3.2'', 1.4µm
Functions HDR
Video 1080p@30fps

Performance

Operating system - OS Android 9.0 (Pie) Android 7.1.1 (Nougat)
Chipset - Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 (10 nm) - Qualcomm SDM630 Snapdragon 630 (14 nm)
- Qualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660 (14 nm) - 128/6GB
CPU - Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Kryo 385 Gold & 4x1.7 GHz Kryo 385 Silver) - Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex A53) - 64/4GB
-Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Kryo 260 & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260) - 128/6GB
GPU Adreno 630 Adreno 508 - 64/4GB
Adreno 512 - 128/6GB
External memory No microSD, up to 256 GB (uses SIM 2 slot)
Internal memory 128 GB, 6 GB RAM 128 GB, 6 GB RAM 64 GB, 4 GB RAM

Benchmark

Antutu 8 Total 275122
Antutu 7 Total
GeekBench 5 Single Core 173
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core 994
GeekBench 4 Single Core 859
GeekBench 4 Multi-Core 4079
GeekBench 4 RenderScript 3688

Communication and Connectivity

SIM card Nano-SIM Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by)
Network GSM / HSPA / LTE GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE
Bands -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
-3G - HSDPA 900 / 2100
-4G - LTE band 1(2100), 3(1800), 7(2600), 8(900), 28(700), 38(2600)
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900  
CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA
-3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100
-4G - LTE band 1(2100), 3(1800), 4(1700/2100), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 12(700), 28(700), 39(1900), 40(2300), 41(2500)
Speed HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A (3CA) Cat15 1024/50 Mbps HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A (2CA) Cat6 300/50 Mbps
GPRS Yes Yes
Edge Yes Yes
Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, WiFi Direct, hotspot Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, WiFi Direct, hotspot
GPS Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS
NFC Yes Yes
USB 2.0, Type-C 1.0 reversible connector (PowerDelivery 2.0) Type-C 1.0 reversible connector, USB On-The-Go
Bluetooth 5.0, A2DP, LE 4.2, A2DP, LE

Music and Audio

Radio No No
Headphone jack No No
Others - Active noise cancellation with dedicated mic
-24-bit/192kHz audio
-Dolby Atmos
- Active noise cancellation with dedicated mic

Other features

Sensors - Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass - Fingerprint (front-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Other extras
- Fast battery charging
- IP68 dust/water proof (up to 1.5m for 30 mins)

- Charging 5V/2A 10W

Reviews and Opinions on Sharp Aquos Zero and Sharp Aquos S2

If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!

There are no comments yet. Be the first to comment.