Sharp Aquos R8 vs Google Pixel 7 Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1

Sharp Aquos R8
Smartphone 2

Google Pixel 7
Smartphone 3
Sharp Aquos R8 or Google Pixel 7 Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
Brand and model | Sharp Aquos R8 | Google Pixel 7 | |
Rating | 0) | (+0) | (+|
Release date | September, 2023 | 2022, October 06 | |
Dimensions (HxWxD) | 74.0 x 159.0 x 8.7 mm | 2.91 x 2.91 x 6.26 in | 155.6 x 73.2 x 8.7 mm | 6.13 x 6.13 x 2.88 in | |
Weight | 208 g | 7.34 oz | 197 g | 6.95 oz | |
Body Build | Aluminium alloy | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame | |
Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
Colors | Gold, Cyan | Obsidian, Lemongrass, Snow | |
Battery | 4570 mAh, Li-Polymer, non-removable | 4355 mAh, Li-Ion, non-removable | |
Approximate price | 650 EUR | ||
Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
Technology | IGZO | AMOLED | |
Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
Display colors | 16M | 16M | |
Screen size | 6.39" in | 6.3" in | |
Screen area | 96.7 cm2 | ||
Screen format | 19.5:9 (height:width) | 20:9 (height:width) | |
Screen to body ratio | 86% | 84.9% | |
Screen resolution | 1260 x 2730 px | 1080 x 2400 px | |
Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 456 PPI | 416 PPI | |
Screen protection | Scratch resistant | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | |
Other specs | - 2000 nits (peak) -Touch 240 Hz |
- 90Hz -HDR10+ -1000 nits (HBM) -1400 nits (peak) -Always-on display |
|
Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
Rear camera, main | 50 MP, Dual | 50 MP, Dual | |
Camera specs | -50 MP, ƒ/ 1.9, 1/1.55", (wide), 1.00 µm -13 MP, ƒ/ 2.2, (ultrawide) |
-50 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, multi-directional PDAF, Laser AF, OIS -12 MP, f/2.2, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.9", 1.25µm |
|
Functions | Dual LED flash | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama | |
Video | 4K Video, 1080p video, Slow Motion 240 fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS, 10-bit HDR | |
DxOMark Main Score | 140 | ||
DxOMark Photo | 145 | ||
DxOMark Video | 143 | ||
Front camera, selfie | 8 MP, Single | 11 MP, Single | |
Specifications | 8 MP, ƒ/ 2.3 | 10.8 MP, f/2.2, 21mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.22µm | |
Functions | Auto-HDR, panorama | ||
Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | ||
DxOMark Selfie Score | 138 | ||
DxOMark Photo | 134 | ||
DxOMark Video | 144 |
Performance
Operating system - OS | Android 13 Tiramisu | Android 13 | |
Chipset | - Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen2 (4 nm) | - Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) | |
CPU | - Octa-Core (1x3.2GHz Cortex X3 + 2x2.8 GHz Cortex A715 + 2x2.8 GHz Cortex A710 + 3x2.02 GHz Cortex A510) | - Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | |
GPU | Qualcomm Adreno 740 | Mali-G710 MP7 | |
External memory | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No | |
Internal memory | 12GB 256GB, 12GB · 256GB | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
Benchmark
Antutu 10 Total | 870018 | ||
Antutu 10 CPU | 251990 | ||
Antutu 10 GPU | 257979 | ||
Antutu 10 Mem | 156779 | ||
Antutu 10 UX | 251990 | ||
Antutu 9 Total | 1285001 | 787451 | |
GeekBench 6 Single Core | 1365 | ||
GeekBench 6 Multi Core | 3178 | ||
GeekBench 6 OpenCL | 3973 | ||
GeekBench 6 Vulkan | 4585 | ||
GeekBench 5 Single Core | 1028 | ||
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 3012 |
Communication and Connectivity
SIM card | Dual SIM, dual stand-by (Nano SIM + eSIM) | Nano-SIM and eSIM | |
Network | 2G / 3G / 4G / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | |
Bands | -2G - CDMA BC0 (800), CDMA BC1 (1900), B2 (1900), B3 (1800), B5 (850), B8 (900) -3G - B1 (2100), B2 (1900), B4 (1700/2100 AWS A-F), B5 (850), B8 (900), B34 (TD 2000), B39 (TD 1900+) -4G - B1 (2100), B2 (1900), B3 (1800), B4 (1700/2100 AWS 1), B5 (850), B7 (2600), B8 (900), B12 (700), B13 (700), B17 (700), B18 (800), B19 (800), B20 (800), B25 (1900+), B26 (850), B28b (700), B28a (700), B32 (1500), B38 (TDD 2600), B39 (TDD 1900), B40 (TDD 2300), B41 (TDD 2500) -5G - n1 (2100), n3 (1800), n20 (800), n28b (700), n28a (700), n41 (2500), n78 (3500), n79 (4700) |
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 CDMA 800 / 1700 / 1900 -3G - HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 CDMA2000 1xEV-DO -4G - LTE -5G - SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave |
|
Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A (CA), 5G | ||
GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
Edge | Yes | Yes | |
Wi-Fi | 802.11a, 802.11b, 802.11g, 802.11n, 802.11n 5GHz, 802.11ac, WiFi 6 (802.11ax),Dual band ,Wi-Fi Hotspot ,Wi-Fi Direct ,Wi-Fi Display | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | |
GPS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | Yes, with dual-band A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS, BDS | |
NFC | Yes | Yes | |
USB | Yes, USB Type C, USB On-The-Go (OTG) | USB Type-C 3.2 | |
Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
Music and Audio
Radio | Yes | No | |
Headphone jack | Yes | No | |
Others |
Other features
Sensors | - Fingerprint (under display), Proximity, Accelerometer, compass, gyro , Infrared port | - Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | |
Other extras |
- Fast charging Yes - Resistance certificates (dust, water) -IP65 -IP68 |
- Fast charging 30W, 50% in 30 min -Fast wireless charging 20W -Reverse wireless charging -USB Power Delivery 3.0 - IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins) |
Reviews and Opinions on Sharp Aquos R8 and Google Pixel 7
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!