Sharp Aquos Wish vs Samsung Galaxy S10 Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1

Sharp Aquos Wish
Smartphone 2

Samsung Galaxy S10
Smartphone 3
Sharp Aquos Wish or Samsung Galaxy S10 Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
Brand and model | Sharp Aquos Wish | Samsung Galaxy S10 | |
Rating | 0) | (+0) | (+|
Release date | December, 2021 | 2019, February | |
Dimensions (HxWxD) | 147.0 x 71.0 x 8.9 mm | 5.79 x 5.79 x 2.8 in | 149.9 x 70.4 x 7.8 mm | 5.9 x 5.9 x 2.77 in | |
Weight | 162 g | 5.71 oz | 157 g | 5.54 oz | |
Body Build | Plastic | Back glass (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | |
Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
Colors | Black, Gold, Green | Prism White, Prism Black, Prism Green, Prism Blue, Canary Yellow, Flamingo Pink | |
Battery | 3730 mAh, Li-Polymer, non-removable | 3400 mAh, Non-removable Li-Ion | |
Approximate price | 930 EUR | ||
Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
Technology | Dynamic AMOLED | ||
Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
Display colors | 16M | 16M | |
Screen size | 5.6" in | 6.1" in | |
Screen area | 93.2 cm2 | ||
Screen format | 19:9 (height:width) | 19:9 (height:width) | |
Screen to body ratio | 75% | 88.3% | |
Screen resolution | 720 x 1520 px | 1440 x 3040 px | |
Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 300 PPI | 550 PPI | |
Screen protection | Scratch resistant | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 | |
Other specs | - HDR10+ -Always-on display |
||
Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
Rear camera, main | 13 MP, Single | 12 MP, Triple | |
Camera specs | -13 MP, ƒ/ 2.0, (wide) | -12 MP, f/1.5-2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, Dual Pixel PDAF, OIS - 12 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.6", 1.0µm, AF, OIS, 2x optical zoom - 16 MP, f/2.2, 12mm (ultrawide), 1.0µm |
|
Functions | LED flash | LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama | |
Video | 1080p video | 2160p@60fps, 1080p@240fps, 720p@960fps, HDR, dual-video rec. | |
DxOMark Main Score | 113 | ||
DxOMark Photo | 120 | ||
DxOMark Video | 97 | ||
Front camera, selfie | 8 MP, Single | 10 MP, Single | |
Specifications | 8 MP, ƒ/ 2.0 | 10 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1.22µm, Dual Pixel PDAF | |
Functions | Dual video call, Auto-HDR | ||
Video | 2160p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
Performance
Operating system - OS | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | Android 9.0 (Pie) | |
Chipset | - Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus (SM4350-AC) (8 nm) | - Exynos 9820 Octa (8 nm) - Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) - USA/LATAM, China |
|
CPU | - Octa-Core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 + 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460,) | - Octa-core (2x2.73 GHz Mongoose M4 & 2x2.31 GHz Cortex-A75 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) - EMEA -Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.41 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) - USA/LATAM, China |
|
GPU | Qualcomm Adreno 619 | Mali-G76 MP12 - EMEA Adreno 640 - USA/LATAM, China |
|
External memory | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSD, up to 512 GB (uses SIM 2 slot) - dual SIM model only | |
Internal memory | 4GB 64GB, 4GB · 64GB | 128/512 GB, 8 GB RAM |
Benchmark
Antutu 10 Total | 574618 | ||
Antutu 10 CPU | 141488 | ||
Antutu 10 GPU | 195201 | ||
Antutu 10 Mem | 117500 | ||
Antutu 10 UX | 141488 | ||
Antutu 9 Total | 381433 | ||
Antutu 8 Total | 411193 | ||
Antutu 7 Total | |||
GeekBench 5 Single Core | 689 | ||
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 2481 | ||
GeekBench 4 Single Core | 4316 | ||
GeekBench 4 Multi-Core | 9819 | ||
GeekBench 4 RenderScript | 7287 |
Communication and Connectivity
SIM card | Dual SIM, dual stand-by (Nano SIM + eSIM) | Single SIM (Nano-SIM)Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | |
Network | 2G / 3G / 4G / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE | |
Bands | -2G - B2 (1900), B3 (1800), B5 (850), B8 (900) -3G - B1 (2100), B2 (1900), B4 (1700/2100 AWS A-F), B6 (800), B8 (900) -4G - B1 (2100), B2 (1900), B3 (1800), B4 (1700/2100 AWS 1), B5 (850), B7 (2600), B8 (900), B12 (700), B17 (700), B19 (800), B26 (850), B28a (700), B39 (TDD 1900), B41 (TDD 2500) -5G - n77 (3700), n78 (3500), n79 (4700), n257 mmWave (28GHz) |
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only) CDMA 800 / 1900 - USA -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global, USA CDMA2000 1xEV-DO - USA -4G - LTE band 1(2100), 2(1900), 3(1800), 4(1700/2100), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 12(700), 13(700), 17(700), 18(800), 19(800), 20(800), 25(1900), 26(850), 28(700), 32(1500), 38(2600), 39(1900), 40(2300), 41(2500), 66(1700/2100) - Global LTE band 1(2100), 2(1900), 3(1800), 4(1700/2100), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 12(700), 13(700), 14(700), 17(700), 18(800), 19(800), 20(800), 25(1900), 26(850), 28(700), 29(700), 30(2300), 38(2600), 39(1900), 40(2300), 41(2500), 46, 66(1700/2100), 71(600) - USA |
|
Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A (7CA) Cat20 2000/150 Mbps | ||
GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
Edge | Yes | Yes | |
Wi-Fi | 802.11a, 802.11b, 802.11g, 802.11n, 802.11n 5GHz, 802.11ac,Dual band ,Wi-Fi Hotspot ,Wi-Fi Direct ,Wi-Fi Display | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | |
GPS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, Galileo | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | |
NFC | Yes | Yes | |
USB | Yes, USB Type C, USB On-The-Go (OTG) | 3.1, Type-C 1.0 reversible connector | |
Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.1, A2DP, AVRCP, HFP, HID, HSP, PAN, SPP, FTP, OPP, PBAP/PAB, HOGP, DUN | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX |
Music and Audio
Radio | No | FM radio (USA & Canada only) | |
Headphone jack | No | Yes | |
Others | - 32-bit/384kHz audio -Active noise cancellation with dedicated mic -Dolby Atmos/AKG sound |
Other features
Sensors | - Fingerprint (side-mounted), Proximity, Accelerometer, compass, gyro , Infrared port | - Fingerprint (under display), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, heart rate, SpO2 | |
Other extras |
- Fast charging Yes - IP67 -IP65 -MIL-STD-810H |
- ANT+ -Bixby natural language commands and dictation -Samsung DeX (desktop experience support) - Fast battery charging 15W -Fast wireless charging 15W -Power bank/Reverse wireless charging 9W - Samsung Pay (Visa, MasterCard certified) -IP68 dust/water proof (up to 1.5m for 30 mins) |
Reviews and Opinions on Sharp Aquos Wish and Samsung Galaxy S10
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!