Sony Xperia E4g vs Samsung ATIV S Neo Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1
Sony Xperia E4g
Smartphone 2
Samsung ATIV S Neo
Smartphone 3
Sony Xperia E4g or Samsung ATIV S Neo Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
| Brand and model | Sony Xperia E4g | Samsung ATIV S Neo | |
| Rating | (+0) | (+0) | |
| Release date | 2015, February | 2013, June | |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 133 x 71 x 10.8 mm | 5.24 x 5.24 x 2.8 in | 135.4 x 69.1 x 9.1 mm | 5.33 x 5.33 x 2.72 in | |
| Weight | 135 g | 4.76 oz | 144 g | 5.08 oz | |
| Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
| Colors | Black, White | Gray | |
| Battery | 2300 mAh, Non-removable Li-Ion | 2000 mAh, Removable Li-Ion | |
| Battery life |
Stand by time - Up to 696 h (2G) / Up to 653 h (3G) Talking time - Up to 12 h 10 min (2G) / Up to 12 h 40 min (3G) Music play - Up to 64 h |
Stand by time - Up to 330 h (3G) Talking time - Up to 15 h (3G) Music play - Up to 70 h |
|
| Approximate price | 130 EUR | 310 EUR | |
| Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
| Technology | IPS LCD | TFT | |
| Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
| Display colors | 16M | 16M | |
| Screen size | 4.7" in | 4.77" in | |
| Screen area | 60.9 cm2 | 62.7 cm2 | |
| Screen format | 16:9 (height:width) | 16:9 (height:width) | |
| Screen to body ratio | 64.5% | 67.0% | |
| Screen resolution | 540 x 960 px | 720 x 1280 px | |
| Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 234 PPI | 308 PPI | |
| Screen protection | Scratch-resistant glass | ||
| Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
| Rear camera, main | 5 MP, Single | 8 MP, Single | |
| Camera specs | -5 MP, AF, f/2.8 | -8 MP, AF | |
| Functions | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR | |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | Yes | |
| Front camera, selfie | 2 MP, Single | 1.2 MP, Single | |
| Specifications | 2 MP, f/2.8 | 1.2 MP | |
| Video | 720p |
Performance
| Operating system - OS | Android 4.4.4 (KitKat) | Microsoft Windows Phone 8 | |
| Chipset | - MediaTek MT6732 (28 nm) | ||
| CPU | - Quad-core 1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 | - Dual-core 1.4 GHz Krait | |
| GPU | Mali-T760MP2 | ||
| External memory | microSD, up to 32 GB (dedicated slot) | microSD, up to 64 GB (dedicated slot) | |
| Internal memory | 8 GB, 1 GB RAM | 16 GB, 1 GB RAM |
Benchmark
| Antutu 7 Total | |||
| GeekBench 4 Single Core | 712 | ||
| GeekBench 4 Multi-Core | 1990 |
Communication and Connectivity
| SIM card | Micro-SIM | Yes | |
| Network | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE | |
| Bands | -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - E2003 HSDPA 850 / 1700 / 1900 / 2100 - E2006 HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700 / 1900 / 2100 - E2053 -4G - LTE band 1(2100), 2(1900), 3(1800), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 20(800) - E2003 LTE band 2(1900), 4(1700/2100), 5(850), 7(2600), 12(700), 13(700), 17(700) - E2006 LTE band 1(2100), 2(1900), 3(1800), 4(1700/2100), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 28(700) - E2053 |
-2G - CDMA 800 / 1900 GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 -3G - CDMA2000 1xEV-DO HSDPA 1900 / 2100 -4G - LTE band 25(1900) |
|
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | EV-DO Rev.A 3.1 Mbps, HSPA, LTE | |
| GPRS | Up to 85.6 kbps | Yes | |
| Edge | Up to 237 kbps | Yes | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g | |
| GPS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS | Yes, with A-GPS | |
| NFC | Yes (E2003 only) | Yes | |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 | |
| Bluetooth | 4.1, A2DP | Yes | |
| Harmful irradiation |
SAR - 0.53 W/kg (head) 1.30 W/kg (body) SAR EU - 0.44 W/kg (head) 0.57 W/kg (body) |
SAR - 0.91 W/kg (head) 1.52 W/kg (body) |
Music and Audio
| Radio | FM radio, RDS | No | |
| Headphone jack | Yes | Yes | |
| Others | - Active noise cancellation with dedicated mic |
Other features
| Sensors | - Accelerometer, proximity | - Accelerometer, proximity | |
| Other extras | |||
| Versions |
- Also known as Sony Xperia E4g E2003, E2006, E2053 |
- For Sprint Also known as Samsung ATIV S neo SPH-I800 |
Reviews and Opinions on Sony Xperia E4g and Samsung ATIV S Neo
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!