Ulefone Armor 17 Pro vs Cat S53 Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1
Ulefone Armor 17 Pro
Smartphone 2
Cat S53
Smartphone 3
Ulefone Armor 17 Pro or Cat S53 Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
Brand and model | Ulefone Armor 17 Pro | Cat S53 | |
Rating | 0) | (+0) | (+|
Release date | 2022, October 31 | 2022, July 19 | |
Dimensions (HxWxD) | 172.7 x 80.4 x 12.5 mm | 6.8 x 6.8 x 3.17 in | 171 x 81 x 16 mm | 6.73 x 6.73 x 3.19 in | |
Weight | 290 g | 10.23 oz | 320 g | 11.29 oz | |
Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
Colors | Black | Black | |
Battery | 5380 mAh, Li-Po, non-removable | 5500 mAh, Li-Po, non-removable | |
Approximate price | 260 EUR | 530 EUR | |
Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
Technology | IPS LCD | IPS LCD | |
Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
Display colors | 16M | 16M | |
Screen size | 6.58" in | 6.5" in | |
Screen area | 104.3 cm2 | 102.0 cm2 | |
Screen format | 20:9 (height:width) | 20:9 (height:width) | |
Screen to body ratio | 75.1% | 73.6% | |
Screen resolution | 1080 x 2408 px | 720 x 1600 px | |
Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 401 PPI | 270 PPI | |
Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | ||
Other specs | - 120Hz | ||
Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
Rear camera, main | 108 MP, Triple | 48 MP, Dual | |
Camera specs | -108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52”, 0.7µm, PDAF -8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚, (ultrawide), 1/4”, 1.12µm -8 MP, (night vision), 2 infrared night vision lights |
-48 MP, f/1.8, (wide) -2 MP, (macro) |
|
Functions | Triple-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash | |
Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps | |
Front camera, selfie | 16 MP, Single | 16 MP, Single | |
Specifications | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.0 | |
Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
Performance
Operating system - OS | Android 12 | Android 11 | |
Chipset | - Mediatek Helio G99 (6nm) | - Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) | |
CPU | - Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | - Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) | |
GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 | |
External memory | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | |
Internal memory | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
Benchmark
Antutu 9 Total | 350567 | 323984 |
Communication and Connectivity
SIM card | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | |
Network | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | |
Bands | -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 -3G - HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 -4G - 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 -3G - HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 -4G - 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 -5G - 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 41, 66, 77, 78 |
|
Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE | |
GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
Edge | Yes | Yes | |
Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, hotspot | |
GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | Yes, with A-GPS | |
NFC | Yes | Yes | |
USB | USB Type-C 2.0, USB On-The-Go | USB Type-C 3.0, USB On-The-Go | |
Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
Music and Audio
Radio | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording | No | |
Headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
Other features
Sensors | - Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | - Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer | |
Other extras |
- MagSafe compatible accessories - Fast charging 66W, 53% in 15 min -Fast wireless charging 15W -Wireless reverse charging - IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins) -Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.5 m -MIL-STD-810G compliant |
- Wireless charging - IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 35 mins) -Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m -MIL-STD-810H compliant -Dedicated flashlight |
Reviews and Opinions on Ulefone Armor 17 Pro and Cat S53
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!