Unihertz Tank 2 vs Unihertz Tank 3 Comparison and Differences

Smartphone 1

Unihertz Tank 2

Unihertz Tank 2

Smartphone 2

Unihertz Tank 3

Unihertz Tank 3

Smartphone 3

Differences between Unihertz Tank 2 and Unihertz Tank 3 - Which to Choose?

Reasons to consider the Unihertz Tank 2:

  • Lighter weight of 531g compared to Tank 3's 666g.
  • High-capacity 15500mAh battery, suitable for extended use.
  • Offered with MediaTek Helio G99 chipset which is efficient for daily tasks.
  • Comes with a triple camera setup including a 108 MP main sensor.
  • Has a 120Hz touch-sensitive screen for smooth interactions.

Reasons to consider the Unihertz Tank 3:

  • Supports 5G connectivity for faster internet speeds.
  • Larger battery capacity of 23800mAh and fast charging of 120W.
  • Equipped with a more powerful Mediatek Dimensity 8200 chipset.
  • Features a quad-camera setup with a massive 200 MP main sensor.
  • Includes advanced features such as Wi-Fi 6 and a telephoto lens in the camera.
  • Comes with more RAM and storage options: 16GB RAM and 512GB internal storage.
  • Higher AnTuTu V10 benchmark score indicating potentially better overall performance.

Both smartphones are from Unihertz's Tank series released in 2023 and come with Android 13, a dedicated microSDXC slot, similar screen sizes and resolutions, and resistance certifications including IP68 and MIL-STD-810H.


Unihertz Tank 2 or Unihertz Tank 3 Specs Comparison

or

Common specs

Brand and model Unihertz Tank 2 Unihertz Tank 3
Rating (+3) (+3)
Release date August, 2023 November, 2023
Dimensions (HxWxD) 179.3 x 85.9 x 23.5 mm | 7.06 x 7.06 x 3.38 in 179.0 x 86.0 x 31.0 mm | 7.05 x 7.05 x 3.39 in
Weight 531 g | 18.73 oz 666 g | 23.49 oz
Body Build Rugged Smartphone, Metal Rugged Smartphone, Metal
Case buy from Amazon

buy from Amazon

Colors Black Black, Silver
Battery 15500 mAh, Li-Polymer, non-removable 23800 mAh, Li-Polymer, non-removable
Approximate price
Check price from Amazon

from Amazon

Screen

Technology LCD IPS LCD IPS
Touchscreen capacitive touchscreen capacitive touchscreen
Display colors 16M 16M
Screen size 6.79" in 6.79" in
Screen area
Screen format 21:9 (height:width) 21:9 (height:width)
Screen to body ratio 71% 71%
Screen resolution 1080 x 2460 px 1080 x 2460 px
Screen PPI /points per inch/ 396 PPI 396 PPI
Other specs - Touch 120 Hz - 120 Hz
Screen protector buy from Amazon buy from Amazon

Camera and Video

Rear camera, main 108 MP, Triple 200 MP, Quad
Camera specs -108 MP, ƒ/ 1.75, 1/1.52", (wide), 0.70 µm
-16 MP, ƒ/ 2.2, (ultrawide), 1.12 µm
-64 MP, 1-4 (2x2), (Night vision camera), 0.70 µm
-200 MP, Unknow, 1/1.4", (wide), 0.56 µm
-50 MP, ƒ/ 2.2, 1/2.55", (ultrawide), 0.70 µm
-64 MP, 1-4 (2x2), (Night vision camera), 0.70 µm
-8 MP, Unknow, (telephoto), 1.00 µm
Functions Dual LED flash Dual LED flash
Video 1080p video 1080p video, Slow Motion 120 fps
Front camera, selfie 32 MP, Single 50 MP, Single
Specifications 32 MP, ƒ/ 2.0, 0.80 µm, 1/2.8" 50 MP, ƒ/ 2.0

Performance

Operating system - OS Android 13 Tiramisu Android 13 Tiramisu
Chipset - MediaTek Helio G99 (MT6789) (6 nm) - Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm)
CPU - Octa-Core (2x Cortex A76 2.2 GHz + 6x Cortex A55 2.0 GHz) - Octa-Core (1x Cortex A78 3.1 GHz + 3x Cortex A78 3.0 GHz + 4x Cortex A55 2.0 GHz)
GPU Mali-G57 MC2 Arm Mali-G610 MC6
External memory microSDXC (dedicated slot) microSDXC (dedicated slot)
Internal memory 12GB 256GB, 12GB · 256GB 16GB 512GB, 16GB · 512GB

Benchmark

Antutu 10 Total 901458

Communication and Connectivity

SIM card Dual SIM, dual stand-by (Nano SIM + Nano SIM) Dual SIM, dual stand-by (Nano SIM + Nano SIM)
Network 2G / 3G / 4G / 2G / 3G / 4G / 5G
Bands -2G - CDMA BC0 (800), CDMA BC1 (1900), B2 (1900), B3 (1800), B5 (850), B8 (900)
-3G - B1 (2100), B2 (1900), B4 (1700/2100 AWS A-F), B5 (850), B6 (800), B8 (900), B19 (800)
-4G - B1 (2100), B2 (1900), B3 (1800), B4 (1700/2100 AWS 1), B5 (850), B7 (2600), B8 (900), B12 (700), B13 (700), B17 (700), B18 (800), B19 (800), B20 (800), B25 (1900+), B26 (850), B28b (700), B28a (700), B34 (TDD 2100), B38 (TDD 2600), B39 (TDD 1900), B40 (TDD 2300), B41 (TDD 2500), B66 (1700/2100)
-2G - CDMA BC0 (800), CDMA BC1 (1900), B2 (1900), B3 (1800), B5 (850), B8 (900)
-3G - B1 (2100), B2 (1900), B4 (1700/2100 AWS A-F), B5 (850), B6 (800), B8 (900), B19 (800)
-4G - B1 (2100), B2 (1900), B3 (1800), B4 (1700/2100 AWS 1), B5 (850), B7 (2600), B8 (900), B12 (700), B13 (700), B17 (700), B18 (800), B19 (800), B20 (800), B25 (1900+), B26 (850), B28b (700), B28a (700), B34 (TDD 2100), B38 (TDD 2600), B39 (TDD 1900), B40 (TDD 2300), B41 (TDD 2500), B66 (1700/2100)
-5G - n1 (2100), n2 (1900 PCS), n3 (1800), n5 (850), n7 (2600), n8 (900), n28b (700), n28a (700), n38 (2600), n40 (2300), n41 (2500), n66 (1700), n71 (600), n77 (3700), n78 (3500), n79 (4700)
Speed
GPRS Yes Yes
Edge Yes Yes
Wi-Fi 802.11a, 802.11b, 802.11g, 802.11n, 802.11n 5GHz, 802.11ac,Dual band ,Wi-Fi Hotspot ,Wi-Fi Direct ,Wi-Fi Display 802.11a, 802.11b, 802.11g, 802.11n, 802.11n 5GHz, 802.11ac,Wi-Fi Hotspot ,Wi-Fi Direct ,Wi-Fi Display ,Wi-Fi MiMO ,Wi-Fi 6
GPS GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, GPS (L1+L5), BeiDou (B1)
NFC Yes Yes
USB Yes, USB Type C, USB On-The-Go (OTG) Yes, USB On-The-Go (OTG)
Bluetooth Bluetooth 5.3, A2DP, EDR, LE, HS Bluetooth 5.3, A2DP, EDR, LE, HS
Harmful irradiation SAR - 0.317 W/Kg on head 0.611 W/Kg on body
SAR EU - 0.783 W/Kg on head 1.214 W/Kg on body

Music and Audio

Radio Yes Yes
Headphone jack Yes Yes

Other features

Sensors - Fingerprint (side-mounted), Proximity, Accelerometer, compass, gyro, barometer, Coulombmeter , Infrared port - Fingerprint (side-mounted), Proximity, Accelerometer, compass, gyro, barometer, Magnetometer, Coulombmeter , Infrared port
Other extras
- Fast charging 60.0W
- Resistance certificates (dust, water)
-IP68, MIL-STD-810H

- Fast charging 120.0W
- Resistance certificates (dust, water)
-IP68, MIL-STD-810H

Reviews and Opinions on Unihertz Tank 2 and Unihertz Tank 3

If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!

vin
2024-01-09 14:38:18
(+0)

I believe each of the Tank models have its own advantages. These differences were not recorded in this rather sparse comaprison. The ULEFONE is also unique in its own rights. This comparison is in my opinion seriously flawed. I suggest a rewrite after thorough research is completed. This comparison does not help anyone looking at obtaining one of these capable units.