vivo iQOO U3 vs vivo iQOO 5 Pro 5G Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1

vivo iQOO U3
Smartphone 2

vivo iQOO 5 Pro 5G
Smartphone 3
vivo iQOO U3 or vivo iQOO 5 Pro 5G Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
Brand and model | vivo iQOO U3 | vivo iQOO 5 Pro 5G | |
Rating | 0) | (+0) | (+|
Release date | 2020, December 14 | 2020, August 17 | |
Dimensions (HxWxD) | 164.2 x 75.4 x 8.4 mm | 6.46 x 6.46 x 2.97 in | 159.6 x 73.3 x 8.9 mm | 6.28 x 6.28 x 2.89 in | |
Weight | 185.5 g | 6.54 oz | 198 g | 6.98 oz | |
Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
Colors | White, Gray, Aurora | White, Black | |
Battery | 5000 mAh, Li-Po, non-removable | 0 mAh, | |
Approximate price | 200 EUR | 610 EUR | |
Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
Technology | IPS LCD | AMOLED | |
Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
Display colors | 16М | 16M | |
Screen size | 6.58" in | 6.56" in | |
Screen area | 104.3 cm2 | 104.6 cm2 | |
Screen format | 20:9 (height:width) | ||
Screen to body ratio | 84.2% | 89.4% | |
Screen resolution | 1080 x 2408 px | 1080 x 2376 px | |
Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 401 PPI | 0 PPI | |
Other specs | - 90Hz -HDR10 -460 nits (typ) |
- HDR10+ -120Hz refresh rate |
|
Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
Rear camera, main | 48 MP, Dual | 50 MP, Triple | |
Camera specs | -48 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0'', 0.8µm, PDAF -2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
-50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.31'', 1.2µm, Dual Pixel PDAF, OIS -8 MP, f/3.4, 135mm (periscope), 1/4.0'', PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom -13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0'', 1.12µm |
|
Functions | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | |
Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 8K, 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | |
Front camera, selfie | 8 MP, Single | 16 MP, Single | |
Specifications | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | |
Functions | HDR | Panorama | |
Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
Performance
Operating system - OS | Android 10, IQOO UI | Android 10, IQOO UI 1.5 | |
Chipset | - MediaTek Dimensity 800U 5G (7 nm) | - Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 (7 nm+) | |
CPU | - Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | - Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 585) | |
GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 | Adreno 650 | |
External memory | No | No | |
Internal memory | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
Benchmark
Antutu 8 Total | 343940 | 677983 |
Communication and Connectivity
SIM card | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | |
Network | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | |
Bands | -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 CDMA 800 -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 -4G - 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 -5G - 1, 41, 78 SA/NSA |
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 -4G - 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 -5G - 1, 3, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
|
Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A, 5G | |
GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
Edge | Yes | Yes | |
Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | |
GPS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | Yes, with dual-band A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | |
NFC | No | Yes | |
USB | USB Type-C 2.0, USB On-The-Go | Type-C 1.0 reversible connector, USB On-The-Go | |
Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
Music and Audio
Radio | No | No | |
Headphone jack | Yes | No | |
Others | - 32-bit/192kHz audio |
Other features
Sensors | - Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | - Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | |
Other extras |
- Fast charging 18W |
- Fast charging 120W, 50% in 5 min, 100% in 15 min -Reverse charging |
Reviews and Opinions on vivo iQOO U3 and vivo iQOO 5 Pro 5G
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!