vivo X200 Pro vs Oppo Find X7 Ultra Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1

vivo X200 Pro
Smartphone 2

Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Smartphone 3
vivo X200 Pro or Oppo Find X7 Ultra Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
Brand and model | vivo X200 Pro | Oppo Find X7 Ultra | |
Rating | 0) | (+0) | (+|
Release date | 2024, October 14 | 2024, January 08 | |
Dimensions (HxWxD) | 162.4 x 76 x 8.2 mm or mm | 6.39 x 6.39 x 2.99 in | 164.3 x 76.2 x 9.5 mm | 6.47 x 6.47 x 3 in | |
Weight | 223 g | 7.87 oz | 221 g | 7.8 oz | |
Body Build | Glass front, aluminum alloy frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass) or eco leather back, aluminum frame | |
Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
Colors | Blue, Black, White, Titanium Grey | Black, Dark Blue, Light Brown | |
Battery | 6000 mAh, Si/C, non-removable | 5000 mAh, , non-removable | |
Approximate price | $ 796.00 | 770 EUR | |
Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
Technology | LTPO AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED | |
Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
Display colors | 1B | 1B | |
Screen size | 6.78" in | 6.82" in | |
Screen area | 111.5 cm2 | 113.0 cm2 | |
Screen format | 20:9 (height:width) | ||
Screen to body ratio | 90.3% | 90.3% | |
Screen resolution | 1260 x 2800 px | 1440 x 3168 px | |
Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 452 PPI | 510 PPI | |
Screen protection | Scratch/drop-resistant glass (Armor Glass) | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | |
Other specs | - 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 4500 nits (peak) - |
- 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1600 nits (typ), 2600 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) - |
|
Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
Rear camera, main | 50 MP, Triple | 50 MP, Quad | |
Camera specs | -50 MP, f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, PDAF, OIS -200 MP, f/2.7, 85mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS, 3.7x optical zoom, macro 2.7:1 -50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF |
-50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS -50 MP, f/2.6, 65mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, 2.8x optical zoom, multi-directional PDAF (25cm - ∞), OIS -50 MP, f/4.3, 135mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, 6x optical zoom, dual pixel PDAF (35cm - ∞), OIS -50 MP, f/2.0, 14mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.95", 1.0µm, PDAF |
|
Functions | Laser AF, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, LED flash, panorama, HDR, 3D LUT import | Laser AF, Hasselblad Color Calibration, LED flash, HDR, panorama | |
Video | 8K@30fps (China only), 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p, gyro-EIS, 10-bit Log, Dolby Vision HDR | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video, Dolby Vision | |
DxOMark Main Score | 157 | ||
DxOMark Photo | 156 | ||
DxOMark Video | 156 | ||
Front camera, selfie | 32 MP, Single | 32 MP, Single | |
Specifications | 32 MP, f/2.0, 20mm (ultrawide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF | |
Functions | HDR | Panorama | |
Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
Performance
Operating system - OS | Android 15, up to 4 major Android upgrades, Funtouch 15 (International), OriginOS 5 (China) | Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, ColorOS 14 | |
Chipset | - Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (3 nm) | - Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) | |
CPU | - Octa-core (1x3.63 GHz Cortex-X925 & 3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720) | - Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) | |
GPU | Immortalis-G925 | Adreno 750 | |
External memory | No | No | |
Internal memory | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
Benchmark
Communication and Connectivity
SIM card | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | |
Network | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | |
Bands | -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 -3G - HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 -4G - 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - China -5G - 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - China |
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 CDMA 800 -3G - HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 CDMA2000 1x -4G - 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 -5G - 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
|
Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G | |
GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
Edge | Yes | Yes | |
Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | |
GPS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS | |
NFC | Yes | Yes; NFC-SIM, HCE, eSE, eID | |
USB | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG | |
Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC |
Music and Audio
Radio | No | No | |
Headphone jack | No | No | |
Others | - 24-bit/192kHz Hi-Res audio |
Other features
Sensors | - Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum , Infrared port | - Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum , Infrared port | |
Other extras |
- Satellite connectivity support (optional, market/region dependent) - 90W Fast charging -30W Wireless charging -Reverse Fast charging - IP68/IP69 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) |
- Emergency SOS via satellite (messages and calls) available in Oppo Find X7 Ultra Satellite version (PHY120) - 100W Fast charging, Power Delivery , 50% in 10 min, 100% in 26 min -50W Wireless charging -10W Reverse wireless charging - IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) |
Reviews and Opinions on vivo X200 Pro and Oppo Find X7 Ultra
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!