Xiaomi 14 Ultra vs Oppo Find X7 Ultra Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Smartphone 2
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Smartphone 3
Differences between Xiaomi 14 Ultra and Oppo Find X7 Ultra - Which to Choose?
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi 14 Ultra:
- Larger battery capacity of 5300 mAh compared to 5000 mAh in the Find X7 Ultra, which may lead to longer battery life.
- Higher screen peak brightness of 3000 nits for better visibility under intense sunlight.
- Advanced camera features with a quad 50 MP setup that includes a 5x optical zoom on its periscope telephoto lens.
- Faster 80W wireless charging capability, compared to the 50W in the Find X7 Ultra.
- Screen protection via Xiaomi's proprietary Shield Glass or Longjing Glass.
- Two-way satellite communication feature.
- Available with larger internal storage of 1TB.
Reasons to consider the Oppo Find X7 Ultra:
- Slightly lower weight at 221 grams compared to Xiaomi 14 Ultra's 220 grams - negligible difference but could be a factor for some users.
- Higher resolution front camera (selfie) with Phase Detection Auto Focus (PDAF).
- Faster wired charging at 100W, charging 50% in 10 minutes, which beats Xiaomi's 90W fast charging.
- Emergency SOS via satellite for messages and calls, focusing on safety and security.
- More affordable with a price of 770 EUR compared to Xiaomi 14 Ultra's price of 1300 EUR.
- Screen protected by the latest Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2.
Xiaomi 14 Ultra or Oppo Find X7 Ultra Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
| Brand and model | Xiaomi 14 Ultra | Oppo Find X7 Ultra | |
| Rating | (+1) | (+0) | |
| Release date | 2024, February 22 | 2024, January 08 | |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 161.4 x 75.3 x 9.2 mm | 6.35 x 6.35 x 2.96 in | 164.3 x 76.2 x 9.5 mm | 6.47 x 6.47 x 3 in | |
| Weight | 219.8 g | 7.75 oz | 221 g | 7.8 oz | |
| Body Build | Glass front (Shield Glass), glass or eco leather back, titanium (grade 5) or aluminum alloy frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass) or eco leather back, aluminum frame | |
| Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
| Colors | Black, Blue, White, Titanium Gray | Black, Dark Blue, Light Brown | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh, , non-removable - International , non-removable - China only | 5000 mAh, , non-removable | |
| Approximate price | € 1,078 | 770 EUR | |
| Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
| Technology | LTPO AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED | |
| Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
| Display colors | 68B | 1B | |
| Screen size | 6.73" in | 6.82" in | |
| Screen area | 108.9 cm2 | 113.0 cm2 | |
| Screen format | 20:9 (height:width) | ||
| Screen to body ratio | 89.6% | 90.3% | |
| Screen resolution | 1440 x 3200 px | 1440 x 3168 px | |
| Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 522 PPI | 510 PPI | |
| Screen protection | Xiaomi Shield Glass / Xiaomi Longjing Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | |
| Other specs | - 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1000 nits (typ), 3000 nits (peak) - |
- 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1600 nits (typ), 2600 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) - |
|
| Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
| Rear camera, main | 50 MP, Quad | 50 MP, Quad | |
| Camera specs | -50 MP, f/1.6-f/4.0, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS -50 MP, f/1.8, 75mm (telephoto), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, dual pixel PDAF (10cm - ∞), OIS, 3.2x optical zoom -50 MP, f/2.5, 120mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, dual pixel PDAF (30cm - ∞), OIS, 5x optical zoom -50 MP, f/1.8, 12mm, 122˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, dual pixel PDAF -TOF 3D, (depth) |
-50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS -50 MP, f/2.6, 65mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, 2.8x optical zoom, multi-directional PDAF (25cm - ∞), OIS -50 MP, f/4.3, 135mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, 6x optical zoom, dual pixel PDAF (35cm - ∞), OIS -50 MP, f/2.0, 14mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.95", 1.0µm, PDAF |
|
| Functions | Laser AF, Leica lenses, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama, 67mm filter ring holder (optional) | Laser AF, Hasselblad Color Calibration, LED flash, HDR, panorama | |
| Video | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@24/30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/480/960/1920fps, gyro-EIS, Dolby Vision HDR 10-bit rec. (4K@60fps, 1080p) | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video, Dolby Vision | |
| DxOMark Main Score | 149 | 157 | |
| DxOMark Photo | 144 | 156 | |
| DxOMark Video | 150 | 156 | |
| Front camera, selfie | 32 MP, Single | 32 MP, Single | |
| Specifications | 32 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF | |
| Functions | HDR, panorama | Panorama | |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
Performance
| Operating system - OS | Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, HyperOS | Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, ColorOS 14 | |
| Chipset | - Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) | - Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) | |
| CPU | - Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) | - Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) | |
| GPU | Adreno 750 | Adreno 750 | |
| External memory | No | No | |
| Internal memory | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
Benchmark
| Antutu 10 Total | 1957217 | ||
| Antutu 10 CPU | 430242 | ||
| Antutu 10 GPU | 809716 | ||
| Antutu 10 Mem | 398125 | ||
| Antutu 10 UX | 430242 |
Communication and Connectivity
| SIM card | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | |
| Network | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | |
| Bands | -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 CDMA 800 -3G - HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 CDMA2000 1xEV-DO -4G - 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 - International 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 - China -5G - 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China |
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 CDMA 800 -3G - HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 CDMA2000 1x -4G - 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 -5G - 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
|
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G | |
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | |
| GPS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS | |
| NFC | Yes | Yes; NFC-SIM, HCE, eSE, eID | |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 Gen 2, DisplayPort, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG | |
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, LHDC | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC |
Music and Audio
| Radio | No | No | |
| Headphone jack | No | No | |
| Others | - 24-bit/192kHz Hi-Res & Hi-Res Wireless audio |
Other features
| Sensors | - Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, color spectrum, barometer , Infrared port | - Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum , Infrared port | |
| Other extras |
- Two-way satellite communication - 90W Fast charging, Power Delivery 3.0, Quick Charge 4, 100% in 33 min -80W Wireless charging, 100% in 46 min -10W Reverse wireless charging - IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) |
- Emergency SOS via satellite (messages and calls) available in Oppo Find X7 Ultra Satellite version (PHY120) - 100W Fast charging, Power Delivery , 50% in 10 min, 100% in 26 min -50W Wireless charging -10W Reverse wireless charging - IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) |
Reviews and Opinions on Xiaomi 14 Ultra and Oppo Find X7 Ultra
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!