Xiaomi 14T Pro vs Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Smartphone 2
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Smartphone 3
Xiaomi 14T Pro or Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
| Brand and model | Xiaomi 14T Pro | Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 | |
| Rating | (+0) | (+0) | |
| Release date | 2024, September 26 | 2024, July 19 | |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 160.4 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm | 6.31 x 6.31 x 2.96 in | 159.4 x 143.3 x 4.6 mm | 6.28 x 6.28 x 5.64 in | |
| Weight | 209 g | 7.37 oz | 226 g | 7.97 oz | |
| Body Build | Glass front, aluminum frame | Glass front (folded), plastic front (unfolded), aluminum frame | |
| Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
| Colors | Titan Gray, Titan Blue, Titan Black | Black, White, Blue | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh, Li-Po, non-removable | 5100 mAh, , non-removable | |
| Approximate price | £ 699.00 | 1140 EUR | |
| Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
| Technology | AMOLED | Foldable LTPO AMOLED | |
| Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
| Display colors | 68B | 1B | |
| Screen size | 6.67" in | 7.98" in | |
| Screen area | 107.4 cm2 | 204.1 cm2 | |
| Screen format | 20:9 (height:width) | 21:9 (height:width) | |
| Screen to body ratio | 89.1% | 89.4% | |
| Screen resolution | 1220 x 2712 px | 2224 x 2488 px | |
| Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 446 PPI | 418 PPI | |
| Screen protection | Scratch/drop-resistant glass | ||
| Other specs | - 144Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1600 nits (HBM), 4000 nits (peak) - |
- 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 1700 nits (HBM), 3000 nits (peak) -Cover display: -LTPO AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 1700 nits (HBM), 3000 nits (peak) -6.56 inches, 1080 x 2520 pixels, 21:9 ratio -Scratch/drop-resistant glass |
|
| Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
| Rear camera, main | 50 MP, Triple | 50 MP, Quad | |
| Camera specs | -50 MP, f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, PDAF, OIS -50 MP, f/2.0, 60mm (telephoto), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, PDAF, 2.6x optical zoom -12 MP, f/2.2, 15mm (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm |
-50 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS -50 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), PDAF (9cm - ∞), OIS, 2x optical zoom -10 MP, f/2.9, 115mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF (30cm - ∞), OIS, 5x optical zoom -12 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide) |
|
| Functions | Leica lens, Ultra HDR, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, LED flash, HDR, panorama, Leica lenses | |
| Video | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS, 10-bit Rec. 2020, HDR10+ | 8K@24fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 720p@1920fps, Dolby Vision HDR | |
| DxOMark Main Score | 135 | ||
| DxOMark Photo | 129 | ||
| DxOMark Video | 138 | ||
| Front camera, selfie | 32 MP, Single | 16 MP, Single | |
| Specifications | 32 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide) | 16 MP, (wide) Cover camera: 16 MP, (wide) |
|
| Functions | HDR | Dolby Vision HDR | |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, HDR10+ | 1080p@30/60fps |
Performance
| Operating system - OS | Android 14, HyperOS | Android 14, HyperOS | |
| Chipset | - Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm) | - Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) | |
| CPU | - Octa-core (1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) | - Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) | |
| GPU | Immortalis-G720 MC12 | Adreno 750 | |
| External memory | No | No | |
| Internal memory | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
Benchmark
Communication and Connectivity
| SIM card | Nano-SIM, eSIM or eSIM, eSIM or Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | |
| Network | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | |
| Bands | -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 -3G - HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 -4G - 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 -5G - 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 CDMA 800 / 1900 -3G - HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 CDMA2000 1xEV-DO -4G - 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 -5G - 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
|
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE (CA), 5G | |
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band (tri-band after future SW update), Wi-Fi Direct | |
| GPS | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASS | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASS | |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes | |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG | |
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, LHDC | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, LHDC |
Music and Audio
| Radio | No | ||
| Headphone jack | No | No | |
| Others | - 24-bit/192kHz Hi-Res & Hi-Res Wireless audio | - 24-bit/192kHz Hi-Res & Hi-Res Wireless audio -Snapdragon Sound |
Other features
| Sensors | - Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass , Infrared port | - Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum, barometer , Infrared port | |
| Other extras |
- Circle to Search - 120W Fast charging, Power Delivery 3.0, Quick Charge 4, 100% in 19 min -50W Wireless charging, 100% in 45 min - IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 2m for 30 min) -6M13 aluminium alloy, 281 N/mm frame rigidity, 260 N/mm device rigidity (advertised values) |
- Two-way satellite communication (calls, messages) - 67W Fast charging, Power Delivery 3.0, Quick Charge 4, 31% in 10 min -50W Wireless charging, 24% in 10 min - IPX8 water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) |
|
| Versions |
- Also known as Xiaomi Mix Fold4 |
Reviews and Opinions on Xiaomi 14T Pro and Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!