Xiaomi Black Shark 3 – Specs, Price, Release Date & Review
- Model: Black Shark 3
- Brand: Xiaomi
- Rating: 3.50 out of 5 (6 votes)
- Price: $ 550
- Year of manufacture: 2020
- Dimensions: 168.7 x 77.3 x 10.4 mm
- Weight: 222 g
- Chipset: Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 (7 nm+)
- Built-in memory: 128GB 8GB RAM
- Screen: AMOLED 6.67 inches
- Battery: 4720 mAh
- Rear camera: Triple, 64MP
- Front camera: Single, 20MP
🛒 BUY
Compare Xiaomi Black Shark 3 with other models:
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 specs
Common | Price | Design | Screen | Hardware | Memory | Software | Main Camera | Selfie camera | Cellular | Connectivity | Battery | Audio | Sensors | Performance Benchmark
Copy all specifications by clicking here
Common
| Brand and model | |
| Launch date | 2020, March 3 |
Price
| First price | $ 550 |
Design
| Height | 6.64 in (168.7 mm) |
| Width | 3.04 in ( 77.3 mm) |
| Depth | 0.41 in ( 10.4 mm) |
| Weight | 7.83 oz (222 grams) |
| Build materials | Glass front, aluminum back, aluminum frame |
| Water resistant |
|
| Colors | Lightning Black, Armor Gray, Star Silver |
| Case | Buy a case from Amazon |
Screen
| Technology | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.67 in |
| Screen Area | 107.4 cm2 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 px |
| Points per inch | 395 PPI |
| Color Depth | 16M |
| Ratio (height:width) | 20:9 |
| Ratio (screen:body) | 82.4% |
| Additional Features | -Always-on display |
| Screen protector | Buy a screen protector from Amazon |
Hardware
| Chipset | ||
| CPU | - Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) |
|
| GPU | - Adreno 650 |
|
Memory
| Internal Memory | 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Memory Card Slot | No |
Software
| Operating System (OS) | Android 10.0 |
| User Interface |
|
Main Camera
| Number of Cameras | Triple |
| Specs |
-64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72'', 0.8µm, PDAF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video Recording | 2160p@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, 720p@1920fps |
Selfie camera
| Number of Cameras | Single |
| Specs | -20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3'', 0.9µm |
| Features | HDR |
| Video Recording | 1080p@30fps |
Cellular
| Bands | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
|
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA -3G - HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 CDMA2000 1xEV-DO -4G - LTE band 1(2100), 3(1800), 4(1700/2100), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 12(700), 17(700), 20(800), 34(2000), 38(2600), 39(1900), 40(2300), 41(2500) -5G - 5G band 41(2500), 78(3500), 79(4700); SA/NSA |
|
| SIM Card | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A; 5G |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot |
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| GPS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS, BDS |
| NFC | No |
| USB | 2.0, Type-C 1.0 reversible connector |
Battery
| Capacity | 4720 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable Li-Po |
| Charging |
-Fast battery charging 65W: 100% in 38 min |
Audio
| Headphone Jack | Yes |
| Radio | No |
| Others |
-stereo speakers |
Sensors
Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
Other specifications
| Others |
|
Performance Benchmark
Antutu Score
| Antutu 8 Score | 575808 (Position 77 out of 1146) |
| Antutu 8 Ranking | |
|---|---|
| 71. Realme X50 Pro Player | 588749 |
| 72. Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro 5G | 585996 |
| 73. Motorola Edge+ | 585189 |
| 74. OnePlus 8T | 585105 |
| 75. Meizu 17 | 580908 |
| 76. LG V60 ThinQ 5G | 580520 |
| 77. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 | 575808 |
| 78. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G | 573850 |
| 79. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro | 572711 |
| 80. Realme X50 Pro 5G | 570642 |
| 81. Sony Xperia Pro | 565720 |
| 82. Xiaomi Mi 10 5G | 565675 |
| 83. Sony Xperia 5 II | 565295 |
| GeekBench 6 Single Core | 1199 (Position 91 out of 578) |
| GeekBench 6 Multi Core | 3430 (Position 74 out of 577) |
| GeekBench 6 Vulkan | 3152 (Position 101 out of 282) |
| GeekBench 6 OpenCL | 3115 (Position 78 out of 325) |
| GeekBench 5 Single Core | 911 (Position 291 out of 1884) |
| GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 3326 (Position 228 out of 1873) |
| GeekBench 6 Single Core Ranking | |
|---|---|
| 85. Asus Zenfone 8 | 1240 |
| 86. OnePlus 9R | 1237 |
| 87. Apple iPhone XR | 1235 |
| 88. Huawei Mate 60 Pro+ | 1218 |
| 89. OnePlus 11R | 1209 |
| 90. OnePlus 9RT | 1207 |
| 91. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 | 1199 |
| 92. Huawei Mate 40 Pro+ | 1191 |
| 93. Asus ROG Phone 3 | 1187 |
| 94. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra | 1184 |
| 95. Huawei Mate 40 Pro | 1179 |
| 96. Xiaomi Redmi K40 | 1177 |
| 97. Asus ROG Phone 5 Ultimate | 1173 |
| GeekBench 6 Multi Core Ranking | |
|---|---|
| 68. Tecno Phantom V Fold | 3523 |
| 69. Apple iPhone 11 | 3513 |
| 70. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro | 3481 |
| 71. Huawei Mate 40 Pro+ | 3479 |
| 72. Asus Zenfone 8 Flip | 3459 |
| 73. OnePlus 10 Pro | 3439 |
| 74. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 | 3430 |
| 75. Tecno Camon 20 Pro 5G | 3391 |
| 76. Google Pixel Fold | 3390 |
| 77. Realme GT Neo 3 | 3388 |
| 78. Huawei Mate 40 Pro | 3377 |
| 79. Xiaomi Poco X4 GT | 3365 |
| 80. Google Pixel 7 Pro | 3359 |
| GeekBench 5 Single Core Ranking | |
|---|---|
| 285. OnePlus Nord 3 | 918 |
| 286. Xiaomi Redmi K40 | 917 |
| 287. Apple iPhone 8 Plus | 917 |
| 288. Huawei Mate 40 | 914 |
| 289. vivo Y23 Pro | 913 |
| 290. vivo V23 Pro | 913 |
| 291. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 | 911 |
| 292. Apple iPhone X | 910 |
| 293. Xiaomi Redmi K50i | 909 |
| 294. Apple iPhone 8 | 909 |
| 295. vivo iQOO Z7 | 908 |
| 296. OnePlus 8 | 907 |
| 297. Oppo Reno10 Pro+ | 902 |
| GeekBench 5 Multi Core Ranking | |
|---|---|
| 222. Sony Xperia 1 IV | 3352 |
| 223. Sony Xperia 1 III | 3350 |
| 224. Huawei Mate 40 | 3350 |
| 225. Apple iPhone 11 Pro | 3348 |
| 226. Realme GT 5G | 3346 |
| 227. Realme GT Neo2T | 3328 |
| 228. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 | 3326 |
| 229. Huawei P50 Pro | 3312 |
| 230. Sony Xperia 5 IV | 3304 |
| 231. Motorola Edge 30 Pro | 3302 |
| 232. Motorola Moto G200 5G | 3301 |
| 233. Infinix GT 10 Pro | 3298 |
| 234. Apple iPhone 11 | 3298 |
This model is often compared with:
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 video reviews
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Reviews and Opinions
Be the first to share your opinion! Do you have any observations or personal experiences you would like to share? Your insights are valuable to us and our community. Leave a comment, and let's discuss the pros and cons of this model together!
