Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro vs i-mobile 8500 Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Smartphone 2
i-mobile 8500
Smartphone 3
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro or i-mobile 8500 Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
| Brand and model | Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro | i-mobile 8500 | |
| Rating | (+0) | (+0) | |
| Release date | 2020, March 3 | 2010 | |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 177.8 x 83.3 x 10.1 mm | 7 x 7 x 3.28 in | 112 x 56.5 x 14.9 mm | 4.41 x 4.41 x 2.22 in | |
| Weight | 253 g | 8.92 oz | 0 g | 0 oz | |
| Body Build | Glass front, aluminum back, aluminum frame | ||
| Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
| Colors | Phantom Black, Armor Gray | Silver | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh, Non-removable Li-Po | 1500 mAh, Removable Li-Ion | |
| Battery life |
Stand by time - Up to 250 h Talking time - Up to 8 h |
||
| Approximate price | $ 830 | ||
| Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
| Technology | AMOLED | TFT | |
| Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
| Display colors | 16M | 256K | |
| Screen size | 7.1" in | 3.2" in | |
| Screen area | 123.7 cm2 | 30.5 cm2 | |
| Screen format | 19.5:9 (height:width) | 3:2 (height:width) | |
| Screen to body ratio | 83.6% | 48.2% | |
| Screen resolution | 1440 x 3120 px | 320 x 480 px | |
| Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 484 PPI | 180 PPI | |
| Other specs | - Always-on display -90Hz refresh rate -500 nits typ. brightness -HDR10+ |
||
| Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
| Rear camera, main | 64 MP, Triple | 5 MP, Single | |
| Camera specs | -64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72'', 0.8µm, PDAF -13 MP, f/2.3, (ultrawide) -5 MP, f/2.2, (depth) |
-5 MP | |
| Functions | LED flash, HDR, panorama | ||
| Video | 2160p@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, 720p@1920fps | Yes | |
| Front camera, selfie | 20 MP, Single | 0 MP, | |
| Specifications | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3'', 0.9µm | No | |
| Functions | HDR | ||
| Video | 1080p@30fps |
Performance
| Operating system - OS | Android 10.0 | Android OS | |
| Chipset | - Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 (7 nm+) | ||
| CPU | - Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) | ||
| GPU | Adreno 650 | ||
| External memory | No | microSD, up to 16 GB (dedicated slot) | |
| Internal memory | 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256 MB, 128 MB RAM |
Benchmark
| Antutu 8 Total | 609523 | ||
| GeekBench 6 Single Core | 1165 | ||
| GeekBench 6 Multi Core | 3319 | ||
| GeekBench 5 Single Core | 890 | ||
| GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 3268 |
Communication and Connectivity
| SIM card | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Mini-SIM | |
| Network | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA | |
| Bands | -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA -3G - HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 CDMA2000 1xEV-DO -4G - LTE band 1(2100), 3(1800), 4(1700/2100), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 12(700), 17(700), 20(800), 34(2000), 38(2600), 39(1900), 40(2300), 41(2500) -5G - 5G band 41(2500), 78(3500), 79(4700); SA/NSA |
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
|
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A; 5G | HSPA | |
| GPRS | Yes | Class 10 | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g | |
| GPS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS, BDS | Yes, with A-GPS | |
| NFC | |||
| USB | 2.0, Type-C 1.0 reversible connector | Proprietary | |
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 2.0, A2DP |
Music and Audio
| Radio | No | Stereo FM radio | |
| Headphone jack | Yes | Yes | |
| Others |
Other features
| Sensors | - Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | - Accelerometer | |
| Other extras |
- --Physical pop-up gaming triggers - Fast battery charging 65W: 100% in 38 min -Magnetic charging 18W |
- MP3/WAV/AAC player -MP4/H.263 player -Organizer -Voice memo -Predictive text input --Trackball |
Reviews and Opinions on Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro and i-mobile 8500
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!