Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra vs Oppo Find X2 Pro Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1
Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra
Smartphone 2
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Smartphone 3
Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra or Oppo Find X2 Pro Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
| Brand and model | Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra | Oppo Find X2 Pro | |
| Rating | (+0) | (+0) | |
| Release date | 2020, August 11 | 2020, March 6 | |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 162.4 x 75.1 x 9.5 mm | 6.39 x 6.39 x 2.96 in | 165.2 x 74.4 x 8.8 mm | 6.5 x 6.5 x 2.93 in | |
| Weight | 221.8 g | 7.82 oz | 207 g | 7.3 oz | |
| Body Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 6), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), cerramic back or leather back, aluminum frame | |
| Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
| Colors | Obsidian Black, Mercury Silver, Transparent Edition | Black (Ceramic), Orange (Leather), Gray (Leather), Lamborghini Edition | |
| Battery | 4500 mAh, Non-removable Li-Ion | 4260 mAh, Non-removable Li-Po | |
| Approximate price | 650 EUR | 1200 EUR | |
| Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
| Technology | OLED | AMOLED | |
| Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
| Display colors | 1B | 1B | |
| Screen size | 6.67" in | 6.7" in | |
| Screen area | 109.2 cm2 | 111.7 cm2 | |
| Screen format | 19.5:9 (height:width) | ||
| Screen to body ratio | 89.5% | 90.9% | |
| Screen resolution | 1080 x 2340 px | 1440 x 3168 px | |
| Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 386 PPI | 0 PPI | |
| Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 | |
| Other specs | - HDR10+ -120Hz refresh rate -800 nits typ. brightness |
- HDR10+ -120Hz refresh rate -800 nits max brightness |
|
| Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
| Rear camera, main | 48 MP, Quad | 48 MP, Triple | |
| Camera specs | -48 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.32'', 1.2µm, PDAF, Laser AF, OIS -48 MP, f/4.1, 120mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0'', 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom, 120x hybrid zoom -12 MP, f/2.0, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.55'', 1.4µm, Dual Pixel PDAF, 2x optical zoom -20 MP, f/2.2, 128˚, 12mm (ultrawide), 1/2.8'', 1.0µm, PDAF |
-48 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.43'', 1.12µm, omnidirectional PDAF, Laser AF, OIS -13 MP, f/3.0, 129mm (periscope telephoto), 1/3.4'', 1.0µm, 5x optical zoom, PDAF, Laser AF, OIS -48 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide), 1/2.0'', 0.8µm, AF |
|
| Functions | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | |
| Video | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10 rec. | 2160p@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS; HDR | |
| DxOMark Main Score | 133 | 124 | |
| DxOMark Photo | 136 | 134 | |
| DxOMark Video | 110 | 104 | |
| Front camera, selfie | 20 MP, Single | 32 MP, Single | |
| Specifications | 20 MP, f/2.3, (wide), 1/3.4'', 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.8'', 0.8µm | |
| Functions | HDR | HDR | |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps | |
| DxOMark Selfie Score | 88 | 72 | |
| DxOMark Photo | 86 | 67 | |
| DxOMark Video | 91 | 79 |
Performance
| Operating system - OS | Android 10, MIUI 12 | Android 10.0; ColorOS 7.1 | |
| Chipset | - Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 (7 nm+) | - Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 (7 nm+) | |
| CPU | - Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) | - Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 585) | |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 650 | |
| External memory | No | No | |
| Internal memory | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
Benchmark
| Antutu 9 Total | 737118 | ||
| Antutu 8 Total | 615410 | ||
| GeekBench 6 Single Core | 1066 | ||
| GeekBench 6 Multi Core | 2961 | ||
| GeekBench 6 OpenCL | 2896 | ||
| GeekBench 6 Vulkan | 2971 | ||
| GeekBench 5 Single Core | 862 | 832 | |
| GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 3133 | 3000 |
Communication and Connectivity
| SIM card | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | |
| Network | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | |
| Bands | -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 CDMA2000 1xEV-DO -4G - 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 -5G - 1, 3, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 -3G - HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 -4G - LTE band 1(2100), 2(1900), 3(1800), 4(1700/2100), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 12(700), 13(700), 17(700), 18(800), 19(800), 20(800), 25(1900), 26(850), 28(700), 29(700), 32(1500), 34(2000), 38(2600), 39(1900), 40(2300), 41(2500), 42(3500), 66(1700/2100) -5G - 5G band 1(2100), 3(1800), 5(850), 7(2600), 28(700), 40(2300), 41(2500), 77(3700), 78(3500), 79(4700); SA/NSA |
|
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A, 5G | |
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | |
| GPS | Yes, with dual-band A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | Yes, with dual-band A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | |
| NFC | Yes | Yes | |
| USB | 2.0, Type-C 1.0 reversible connector, USB On-The-Go | 3.1, Type-C 1.0 reversible connector, USB On-The-Go | |
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
Music and Audio
| Radio | No | No | |
| Headphone jack | No | No | |
| Others | - 24-bit/192kHz audio |
Other features
| Sensors | - Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer , Infrared port | - Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | |
| Other extras |
- Fast charging 120W, 41% in 5 min, 100% in 23 min -Fast wireless charging 50W, 100% in 40 mins -Reverse wireless charging 10W -Quick Charge 5, Quick Charge 4+ -Power Delivery 3.0 |
- Fast charging 65W, 100% in 38 min -SuperVOOC 2.0 -USB Power Delivery - IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins) |
Reviews and Opinions on Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra and Oppo Find X2 Pro
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!