Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro vs Apple iPhone 7 Plus Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Smartphone 2
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
Smartphone 3
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro or Apple iPhone 7 Plus Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
| Brand and model | Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro | Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Rating | (+0) | (+0) | |
| Release date | 2019, August | 2016, September | |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 156.7 x 74.3 x 8.8 mm | 6.17 x 6.17 x 2.93 in | 158.2 x 77.9 x 7.3 mm | 6.23 x 6.23 x 3.07 in | |
| Weight | 191 g | 6.74 oz | 188 g | 6.63 oz | |
| Body Build | Front/back glass (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Front glass, body | |
| Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
| Colors | Carbon black, Red flame, Glacier blue, White | Jet Black, Black, Silver, Gold, Rose Gold, Red | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh, Non-removable Li-Po | 2900 mAh, Non-removable Li-Ion | |
| Battery life |
Stand by time - Up to 384 h (3G) Talking time - Up to 21 h (3G) Music play - Up to 60 h |
||
| Approximate price | 430 EUR | 690 EUR | |
| Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
| Technology | Super AMOLED | LED-backlit IPS LCD | |
| Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
| Display colors | 16M | 16M | |
| Screen size | 6.39" in | 5.5" in | |
| Screen area | 100.2 cm2 | 83.4 cm2 | |
| Screen format | 19.5:9 (height:width) | 16:9 (height:width) | |
| Screen to body ratio | 86.1% | 67.7% | |
| Screen resolution | 1080 x 2340 px | 1080 x 1920 px | |
| Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 403 PPI | 401 PPI | |
| Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Ion-strengthened glass, oleophobic coating | |
| Other specs | - HDR | - Wide color gamut -3D Touch display & home button |
|
| Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
| Rear camera, main | 48 MP, Triple | 12 MP, Dual | |
| Camera specs | -48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2'', 0.8µm, PDAF, Laser AF -8 MP, f/2.4, 53mm (telephoto), 1/4'', 1.12µm, PDAF, Laser AF, 2x optical zoom -13 MP, f/2.4, 12mm (ultrawide), 1/3'', 1.12µm |
-12 MP, f/1.8, 28mm (wide), 1/3'', OIS, PDAF -12 MP, f/2.8, 56mm (telephoto), 1/3.6'', 2x optical zoom, AF |
|
| Functions | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Quad-LED dual-tone flash, HDR | |
| Video | 2160p@30/60fps, 1080p@30/120/240fps, 1080p@960fps | 2160p@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@240fps | |
| DxOMark Main Score | 88 | ||
| DxOMark Photo | 90 | ||
| DxOMark Video | 84 | ||
| Front camera, selfie | 20 MP, Single | 7 MP, Single | |
| Specifications | Motorized pop-up 20 MP, f/2.2, 0.8µm | 7 MP, f/2.2, 32mm (standard) | |
| Functions | HDR | Face detection, HDR | |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
Performance
| Operating system - OS | Android 9.0 (Pie); MIUI 10 | iOS 10.0.1, upgradable to iOS 12.1.3 | |
| Chipset | - Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) | - Apple A10 Fusion (16 nm) | |
| CPU | - Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 485) | - Quad-core 2.34 GHz (2x Hurricane + 2x Zephyr) | |
| GPU | Adreno 640 | PowerVR Series7XT Plus (six-core graphics) | |
| External memory | No | No | |
| Internal memory | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 32/128/256 GB, 3 GB RAM |
Benchmark
| Antutu 10 Total | 617740 | 302609 | |
| Antutu 10 CPU | 192583 | 88654 | |
| Antutu 10 GPU | 186283 | 95382 | |
| Antutu 10 Mem | 104973 | 48875 | |
| Antutu 10 UX | 192583 | 88654 | |
| Antutu 8 Total | 442943 | 235957 | |
| Antutu 7 Total | |||
| GeekBench 6 Single Core | 857 | 807 | |
| GeekBench 6 Multi Core | 2513 | 1117 | |
| GeekBench 6 OpenCL | 2515 | ||
| GeekBench 6 Vulkan | 2153 | ||
| GeekBench 6 Metal | 3814 | ||
| GeekBench 5 Single Core | 681 | 725 | |
| GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 2570 | 1295 | |
| GeekBench 4 Single Core | 3536 | 3441 | |
| GeekBench 4 Multi-Core | 11199 | 5797 | |
| GeekBench 4 Battery | 2329 |
Communication and Connectivity
| SIM card | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM | |
| Network | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE | |
| Bands | -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 -4G - LTE band 1(2100), 2(1900), 3(1800), 4(1700/2100), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 20(800), 28(700), 38(2600), 40(2300) |
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - A1661, A1784 CDMA 800 / 1900 / 2100 - A1661 -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - A1661, A1784 CDMA2000 1xEV-DO & TD-SCDMA - A1661 -4G - LTE band 1(2100), 2(1900), 3(1800), 4(1700/2100), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 12(700), 13(700), 17(700), 18(800), 19(800), 20(800), 25(1900), 26(850), 27(800), 28(700), 29(700), 30(2300), 38(2600), 39(1900), 40(2300), 41(2500) - A1661, A1784 |
|
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A (3CA) Cat9 450/50 Mbps, EV-DO Rev.A 3.1 Mbps | |
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, hotspot | |
| GPS | Yes, with dual-band A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS | |
| NFC | Yes | Yes | |
| USB | 2.0, Type-C 1.0 reversible connector, USB On-The-Go | 2.0, proprietary reversible connector | |
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 4.2, A2DP, LE | |
| Harmful irradiation |
SAR - 1.03 W/kg (head) 0.72 W/kg (body) SAR EU - 1.30 W/kg (head) 1.51 W/kg (body) |
SAR - 1.19 W/kg (head) 1.19 W/kg (body) SAR EU - 1.24 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
Music and Audio
| Radio | Yes | No | |
| Headphone jack | Yes | No | |
| Others | - 24-bit/192kHz audio -Active noise cancellation with dedicated mic |
- Active noise cancellation with dedicated mic |
Other features
| Sensors | - Fingerprint (under display), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | - Fingerprint (front-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | |
| Other extras |
- Fast battery charging 27W (Quick Charge 4+) |
- Siri natural language commands and dictation - IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 mins) -Apple Pay (Visa, MasterCard, AMEX certified) |
|
| Versions |
- For Global market |
Reviews and Opinions on Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro and Apple iPhone 7 Plus
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!