Xiaomi Mi A3 vs Nokia 3.1 A Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1

Xiaomi Mi A3
Smartphone 2

Nokia 3.1 A
Smartphone 3
Xiaomi Mi A3 or Nokia 3.1 A Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
Brand and model | Xiaomi Mi A3 | Nokia 3.1 A | |
Rating | (+) | (+) | |
Release date | 2019, July | 2019, June | |
Dimensions (HxWxD) | 153.5 x 71.9 x 8.5 mm | 6.04 x 6.04 x 2.83 in | 152.7 x 71.9 x 9.4 mm | 6.01 x 6.01 x 2.83 in | |
Weight | 173.8 g | 6.13 oz | 156 g | 5.5 oz | |
Body Build | Back glass (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | ||
Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
Colors | Kind of Gray, Not just Blue, More than White | Black | |
Battery | 4030 mAh, Non-removable Li-Po | 2990 mAh, Non-removable Li-Ion | |
Approximate price | 250 EUR | ||
Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
Technology | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD | |
Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
Display colors | 16M | 16M | |
Screen size | 6.01" in | 5.45" in | |
Screen area | 88.7 cm2 | 76.7 cm2 | |
Screen format | 19.5:9 (height:width) | 18:9 (height:width) | |
Screen to body ratio | 80.3% | 69.8% | |
Screen resolution | 720 x 1560 px | 720 x 1440 px | |
Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 286 PPI | 295 PPI | |
Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | ||
Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
Rear camera, main | 48 MP, Triple | 8 MP, Single | |
Camera specs | -48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2'', 0.8µm, PDAF -8 MP, (ultrawide), f/2.2, 1.12µm -2 MP, f/2.4, depth sensor |
-8 MP, f/2.0, AF | |
Functions | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama | |
Video | 2160p@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps | 1080p@30fps | |
Front camera, selfie | 32 MP, Single | 5 MP, Single | |
Specifications | 32 MP, f/2.0, 0.8µm | 5 MP, f/2.2 | |
Functions | HDR | HDR | |
Video | 1080p@30fps | 720p@30fps |
Performance
Operating system - OS | Android 9.0 (Pie); Android One | Android 9.0 (Pie) | |
Chipset | - Qualcomm SM6125 Snapdragon 665 (11 nm) | - Qualcomm SDM429 Snapdragon 429 | |
CPU | - Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | - Quad-core 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 | |
GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 504 | |
External memory | microSD, up to 256 GB (uses shared SIM slot) | microSD, up to 128 GB | |
Internal memory | 64/128 GB, 4 GB RAM | 32 GB, 2 GB RAM |
Benchmark
Antutu 8 Total | 177109 | ||
Antutu 7 Total | |||
GeekBench 6 Single Core | 329 | ||
GeekBench 6 Multi Core | 1075 | ||
GeekBench 6 OpenCL | 290 | ||
GeekBench 6 Vulkan | 466 | ||
GeekBench 5 Single Core | 312 | ||
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 1357 | ||
GeekBench 4 Single Core | 1501 | ||
GeekBench 4 Multi-Core | 5662 |
Communication and Connectivity
SIM card | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM | |
Network | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE | |
Bands | -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700 / 1900 / 2100 -4G - LTE band 1(2100), 2(1900), 3(1800), 4(1700/2100), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 20(800), 28(700), 38(2600), 40(2300) - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 -3G - HSDPA (unspecified) -4G - LTE (unspecified) |
|
Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A (2CA) 450/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | |
GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
Edge | Yes | Yes | |
Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, hotspot | |
GPS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS | |
NFC | |||
USB | 2.0, Type-C 1.0 reversible connector | 2.0, Type-C 1.0 reversible connector | |
Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
Music and Audio
Radio | FM radio | FM radio | |
Headphone jack | Yes | Yes | |
Others | - Active noise cancellation with dedicated mic |
Other features
Sensors | - Fingerprint (under display), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass , Infrared port | - Accelerometer, gyro, proximity | |
Other extras |
- Fast battery charging 18W (Quick Charge 3) |
- Fast battery charging 10W |
|
Versions |
- For AT&T |
Reviews and Opinions on Xiaomi Mi A3 and Nokia 3.1 A
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!