Xiaomi Mi Mix vs Sharp Aquos SH80F Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1
Xiaomi Mi Mix
Smartphone 2
Sharp Aquos SH80F
Smartphone 3
Xiaomi Mi Mix or Sharp Aquos SH80F Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
| Brand and model | Xiaomi Mi Mix | Sharp Aquos SH80F | |
| Rating | (+0) | (+0) | |
| Release date | 2016, October | 2011, September | |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 158.8 x 81.9 x 7.9 mm | 6.25 x 6.25 x 3.22 in | 127 x 64 x 11.9 mm | 5 x 5 x 2.52 in | |
| Weight | 209 g | 7.37 oz | 135 g | 4.76 oz | |
| Body Build | Front glass, ceramic frame, back | ||
| Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
| Colors | Black, White | Black | |
| Battery | 4400 mAh, Non-removable Li-Ion | 1240 mAh, Removable Li-Ion | |
| Battery life |
Stand by time - Up to 450 h (2G) / Up to 410 h (3G) Talking time - Up to 5 h 20 min (2G) / Up to 5 h 20 min (3G) |
||
| Approximate price | 390 EUR | 470 EUR | |
| Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
| Technology | IPS LCD | 3D LCD | |
| Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
| Display colors | 16M | 16M | |
| Screen size | 6.4" in | 4.2" in | |
| Screen area | 108.7 cm2 | 48.6 cm2 | |
| Screen format | 17:9 (height:width) | 16:9 (height:width) | |
| Screen to body ratio | 83.6% | 59.8% | |
| Screen resolution | 1080 x 2040 px | 540 x 960 px | |
| Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 362 PPI | 262 PPI | |
| Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
| Rear camera, main | 16 MP, Single | 8 MP, Single | |
| Camera specs | -16 MP, f/2.0, 1/3'', 1.0µm, PDAF | -8 MP, AF -8 MP, AF |
|
| Functions | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR | LED flash | |
| Video | 2160p@30fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS), 720p@120fps | 1080p (2D), 720p (3D) | |
| Front camera, selfie | 5 MP, Single | 0.3 MP, Single | |
| Specifications | 5 MP, f/2.2 | VGA | |
| Video | 1080p@30fps |
Performance
| Operating system - OS | Android 6.0 (Marshmallow), upgradable to 8.0 (Oreo); MIUI 10 | Android 2.3 (Gingerbread) | |
| Chipset | - Qualcomm MSM8996 Snapdragon 821 (14 nm) | ||
| CPU | - Quad-core (2x2.35 GHz Kryo & 2x2.19 GHz Kryo) | - 1.0 GHz Scorpion | |
| GPU | Adreno 530 | Adreno 205 | |
| External memory | No | microSD, up to 32 GB (dedicated slot) | |
| Internal memory | 256 GB, 6 GB RAM 128 GB, 4 GB RAM | 2 GB, 512 MB RAM |
Benchmark
| Antutu 7 Total | |||
| GeekBench 6 Single Core | 352 | ||
| GeekBench 6 Multi Core | 696 | ||
| GeekBench 5 Single Core | 305 | ||
| GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 757 | ||
| GeekBench 4 Single Core | 1749 | ||
| GeekBench 4 Multi-Core | 3882 | ||
| GeekBench 4 RenderScript | 6859 |
Communication and Connectivity
| SIM card | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Mini-SIM | |
| Network | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA | |
| Bands | -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 -4G - LTE band 1(2100), 2(1900), 3(1800), 4(1700/2100), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 38(2600), 39(1900), 40(2300), 41(2500) |
-2G - GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
|
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A (3CA) Cat12 600/150 Mbps | HSPA | |
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, WiFi Direct, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, DLNA, hotspot | |
| GPS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS | Yes, with A-GPS | |
| NFC | Yes | ||
| USB | Type-C 1.0 reversible connector | microUSB 2.0 | |
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 3.0, A2DP, EDR |
Music and Audio
| Radio | No | Stereo FM radio, RDS | |
| Headphone jack | Yes | Yes | |
| Others | - Active noise cancellation with dedicated mic |
Other features
| Sensors | - Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | - Accelerometer, proximity, compass , Infrared port | |
| Other extras |
- Fast battery charging (Quick Charge 3.0) |
- HDMI port -MP3/AAC+/WAV/WMA player -MP4/Xvid/H.264/WMV player -Organizer -3D photo viewer -Document viewer/editor -Voice memo/dial -Predictive text input |
|
| Versions |
- For Orange Also known as Sharp AQUOS PHONE SH80F |
Reviews and Opinions on Xiaomi Mi Mix and Sharp Aquos SH80F
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!