Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro vs Qtek S200 Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1
Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro
Smartphone 2
Qtek S200
Smartphone 3
Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro or Qtek S200 Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
| Brand and model | Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro | Qtek S200 | |
| Rating | (+0) | (+0) | |
| Release date | 2020, July 07 | 2005, Q4 | |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 165.8 x 76.7 x 8.8 mm | 6.53 x 6.53 x 3.02 in | 108.8 x 59.3 x 18.4 mm | 4.28 x 4.28 x 2.33 in | |
| Weight | 209 g | 7.37 oz | 150 g | 5.29 oz | |
| Body Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame | ||
| Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
| Colors | Out Of The Blue, Green and Greener, Two Shades of Black | Stylish black | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh, Non-removable Li-Po | 1200 mAh, Removable Li-Ion | |
| Battery life |
Stand by time - Up to 200 h Talking time - Up to 5 h |
||
| Approximate price | 170 EUR | 250 EUR | |
| Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
| Technology | IPS LCD | TFT | |
| Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | resistive touchscreen | |
| Display colors | 16M | 65K | |
| Screen size | 6.67" in | 2.8" in | |
| Screen area | 107.4 cm2 | 24.3 cm2 | |
| Screen format | 20:9 (height:width) | 4:3 (height:width) | |
| Screen to body ratio | 84.5% | 37.6% | |
| Screen resolution | 1080 x 2400 px | 240 x 320 px | |
| Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 395 PPI | 143 PPI | |
| Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | ||
| Other specs | - 450 nits typ. brightness -HDR10 |
- Handwriting recognition | |
| Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
| Rear camera, main | 48 MP, Quad | 2 MP, Single | |
| Camera specs | -48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0'', 0.8µm, PDAF -8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0'', 1.12µm -5 MP, f/2.4, (macro), AF -2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
-2 MP | |
| Functions | LED flash, HDR, panorama | ||
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS | CIF | |
| Front camera, selfie | 16 MP, Single | 0 MP, | |
| Specifications | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06'' 1.0µm | ||
| Functions | HDR, panorama | ||
| Video | 1080p@30/120fps |
Performance
| Operating system - OS | Android 10, MIUI 11 | Microsoft Windows Mobile 5.0 PocketPC | |
| Chipset | - Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) | - TI OMAP 850 | |
| CPU | - Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) | - 200 MHz ARM926EJ-S | |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | ||
| External memory | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | SD/MMC | |
| Internal memory | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64 MB RAM, 128 MB ROM |
Benchmark
| Antutu 9 Total | 337112 | ||
| GeekBench 6 Single Core | 730 | ||
| GeekBench 6 Multi Core | 1714 | ||
| GeekBench 6 OpenCL | 1163 | ||
| GeekBench 6 Vulkan | 492 | ||
| GeekBench 5 Single Core | 559 | ||
| GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 1686 |
Communication and Connectivity
| SIM card | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Mini-SIM | |
| Network | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM | |
| Bands | -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 -4G - 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40 |
||
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A | ||
| GPRS | Yes | Class 10 | |
| Edge | Yes | Class 10 | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11b | |
| GPS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | No | |
| NFC | |||
| USB | 2.0, Type-C 1.0 reversible connector, USB On-The-Go | miniUSB | |
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 2.0 | |
| Harmful irradiation |
SAR EU - 0.91 W/kg (head) 0.56 W/kg (body) |
Music and Audio
| Radio | FM radio, recording | No | |
| Headphone jack | Yes | No | |
| Others | - 2.5 mm audio jack |
Other features
| Sensors | - Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass , Infrared port | , Infrared port | |
| Other extras |
- Fast charging 33W - Water-repellent coating |
- Pocket Office -Voice memo -MP3/AAC player |
|
| Versions |
- Produced by HTC. Functionally identical to i-mate JAMin, O2 XDA Neo. |
Reviews and Opinions on Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro and Qtek S200
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!