Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G vs Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Smartphone 2
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Smartphone 3
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G or Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
| Brand and model | Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G | Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G | |
| Rating | (+0) | (+0) | |
| Release date | 2024, January 15 | 2021, August 17 | |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 161.1 x 75 x 8 mm | 6.34 x 6.34 x 2.95 in | 159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm | 6.3 x 6.3 x 2.96 in | |
| Weight | 188 g | 6.63 oz | 189 g | 6.67 oz | |
| Body Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back | |
| Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
| Colors | Midnight Black, Lavender Purple, Forest Green | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Purple, Awesome Mint | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh, , non-removable | 4500 mAh, Li-Po, non-removable | |
| Approximate price | $ 200.00 | 440 EUR | |
| Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
| Technology | AMOLED | Super AMOLED | |
| Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
| Display colors | 1B | 16M | |
| Screen size | 6.67" in | 6.5" in | |
| Screen area | 107.4 cm2 | 102.0 cm2 | |
| Screen format | 20:9 (height:width) | 20:9 (height:width) | |
| Screen to body ratio | 88.9% | 84.9% | |
| Screen resolution | 1080 x 2400 px | 1080 x 2400 px | |
| Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 395 PPI | 405 PPI | |
| Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | |
| Other specs | - 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) - |
- 120Hz -800 nits (HBM) |
|
| Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
| Rear camera, main | 200 MP, Triple | 64 MP, Quad | |
| Camera specs | -200 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS -8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, (ultrawide) -2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) |
-64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7'', 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS -12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm -5 MP, f/2.4, (macro) -5 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
|
| Functions | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR | |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS | |
| Front camera, selfie | 16 MP, Single | 32 MP, Single | |
| Specifications | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8'', 0.8µm | |
| Functions | HDR | ||
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
Performance
| Operating system - OS | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS | Android 11, One UI 3.1 | |
| Chipset | - Mediatek Helio G99 Ultra | - Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) | |
| CPU | - Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | - Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 670 & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 670) | |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 642L | |
| External memory | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | |
| Internal memory | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
Benchmark
| Antutu 10 Total | 592793 | 548467 | |
| Antutu 10 CPU | 192244 | 190588 | |
| Antutu 10 GPU | 115532 | 132749 | |
| Antutu 10 Mem | 138083 | 98217 | |
| Antutu 10 UX | 192244 | 190588 | |
| Antutu 9 Total | 505147 | ||
| Antutu 8 Total | 428765 | ||
| GeekBench 6 Single Core | 940 | ||
| GeekBench 6 Multi Core | 2729 | ||
| GeekBench 6 OpenCL | 1930 | ||
| GeekBench 6 Vulkan | 2334 | ||
| GeekBench 5 Single Core | 720 | ||
| GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 2660 |
Communication and Connectivity
| SIM card | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Single SIM (Nano-SIM)Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | |
| Network | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | |
| Bands | -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 -4G - 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only) -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 -4G - 2, 4, 5, 12, 17, 26, 40, 41, 66 -5G - 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
|
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A (CA) Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G | |
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) | |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, USB On-The-Go | |
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE | |
| Harmful irradiation |
SAR - 0.72 W/kg (head) SAR EU - 0.88 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) |
Music and Audio
| Radio | FM radio | ||
| Headphone jack | Yes | Yes | |
| Others |
Other features
| Sensors | - Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity , Infrared port | - Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | |
| Other extras |
- 67W Fast charging, 50% in 16 min, 100% in 46 min - IP54, dust and splash resistant |
- ANT+ - Fast charging 25W - IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 mins) |
Reviews and Opinions on Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G and Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!