Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A71 Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Smartphone 2
Samsung Galaxy A71
Smartphone 3
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G or Samsung Galaxy A71 Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
| Brand and model | Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G | Samsung Galaxy A71 | |
| Rating | (+0) | (+0) | |
| Release date | 2025, January 10 | 2019, December | |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 162.3 x 74.4 x 8.4 mm | 6.39 x 6.39 x 2.93 in | 163.6 x 76 x 7.7 mm | 6.44 x 6.44 x 2.99 in | |
| Weight | 190 g | 6.7 oz | 179 g | 6.31 oz | |
| Body Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), plastic back or silicone polymer back (eco leather), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame | |
| Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
| Colors | Lavender Purple, Coral Green, Midnight Black | Prism, Crush Black, Silver, Blue, Pink | |
| Battery | 5110 mAh, | 4500 mAh, Non-removable Li-Po | |
| Battery life |
Talking time - Up to 42 h (4G) Music play - Up to 107 h |
||
| Approximate price | € 325.7 | 399 EUR | |
| Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
| Technology | AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus | |
| Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
| Display colors | 68B | 16M | |
| Screen size | 6.67" in | 6.7" in | |
| Screen area | 107.4 cm2 | 108.4 cm2 | |
| Screen format | 20:9 (height:width) | 20:9 (height:width) | |
| Screen to body ratio | 88.9% | 87.2% | |
| Screen resolution | 1220 x 2712 px | 1080 x 2400 px | |
| Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 446 PPI | 393 PPI | |
| Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | |
| Other specs | - 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 3000 nits (peak) -Always-on display |
||
| Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
| Rear camera, main | 200 MP, Triple | 64 MP, Quad | |
| Camera specs | -200 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS -8 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm -2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) |
-64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF -12 MP, f/2.2, 12mm (ultrawide) -5 MP, f/2.4, 25mm (macro), 1/5.0", 1.12µm -5 MP, f/2.2, 1/5.0", 1.12µm, depth sensor |
|
| Functions | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR | |
| Video | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 2160p@30fps, 1080p@30/240fps, 1080p@960fps; gyro-EIS | |
| DxOMark Main Score | 84 | ||
| DxOMark Photo | 89 | ||
| DxOMark Video | 74 | ||
| Front camera, selfie | 20 MP, Single | 32 MP, Single | |
| Specifications | 20 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/4.0", 0.7µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | |
| Functions | HDR, panorama | HDR | |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps | |
| DxOMark Selfie Score | 83 | ||
| DxOMark Photo | 83 | ||
| DxOMark Video | 82 |
Performance
| Operating system - OS | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS | Android 10.0; One UI 2 | |
| Chipset | - Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Ultra (4 nm) | - Qualcomm SDM730 Snapdragon 730 (8 nm) - Qualcomm SDM730 Snapdragon 730G (8 nm) - Philippines |
|
| CPU | - Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | - Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver) | |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Adreno 618 | |
| External memory | No | microSD, up to 1 TB (dedicated slot) | |
| Internal memory | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
Benchmark
| Antutu 10 Total | 353835 | ||
| Antutu 10 CPU | 126775 | ||
| Antutu 10 GPU | 70969 | ||
| Antutu 10 Mem | 70395 | ||
| Antutu 10 UX | 126775 | ||
| Antutu 8 Total | 265537 | ||
| GeekBench 6 Single Core | 635 | ||
| GeekBench 6 Multi Core | 1607 | ||
| GeekBench 6 OpenCL | 1021 | ||
| GeekBench 6 Vulkan | 958 | ||
| GeekBench 5 Single Core | 509 | ||
| GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 1638 |
Communication and Connectivity
| SIM card | Nano-SIM + eSIM Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
Single SIM (Nano-SIM)Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | |
| Network | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE | |
| Bands | -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 -3G - HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 -4G - 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 -5G - 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only) -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 -4G - LTE band 1(2100), 2(1900), 3(1800), 4(1700/2100), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 12(700), 13(700), 17(700), 20(800), 28(700), 38(2600), 40(2300), 41(2500), 66(1700/2100) |
|
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE-A | |
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | |
| GPS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market dependent) | |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | 2.0, Type-C 1.0 reversible connector, USB On-The-Go | |
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE | |
| Harmful irradiation |
SAR - 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.06 W/kg (body) SAR EU - 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
SAR - 0.98 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) SAR EU - 0.51 W/kg (head) 1.56 W/kg (body) |
Music and Audio
| Radio | FM radio | ||
| Headphone jack | No | Yes | |
| Others | - 24-bit/192kHz Hi-Res & Hi-Res wireless audio | - Active noise cancellation with dedicated mic |
Other features
| Sensors | - Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity , Infrared port | - Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | |
| Other extras |
- Circle to Search - 45W Fast charging, Power Delivery - IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) |
- ANT+ - Fast battery charging 25W |
|
| Versions |
- Not to be confused with Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G for India and China |
- Versions: SM-A715F/DS, SM-A715F/DSN (Global); SM-A715F/DSM (Russia) |
Reviews and Opinions on Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G and Samsung Galaxy A71
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!