Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Max vs Micromax Canvas Fire 4G Q411 Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Max
Smartphone 2
Micromax Canvas Fire 4G Q411
Smartphone 3
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Max or Micromax Canvas Fire 4G Q411 Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
| Brand and model | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Max | Micromax Canvas Fire 4G Q411 | |
| Rating | (+0) | (+0) | |
| Release date | 2020, March 12 | 2015, September | |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 165.5 x 76.7 x 8.8 mm | 6.52 x 6.52 x 3.02 in | ||
| Weight | 209 g | 7.37 oz | 0 g | 0 oz | |
| Body Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame | ||
| Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
| Colors | Aurora Blue, Glacier White, Interstellar Black | Black | |
| Battery | 5020 mAh, Non-removable Li-Po | 1850 mAh, Removable Li-Ion | |
| Battery life |
Stand by time - Up to 320 h Talking time - Up to 6 h 30 min |
||
| Approximate price | 180 EUR | ||
| Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
| Technology | IPS LCD | IPS LCD | |
| Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
| Display colors | 16M | 16M | |
| Screen size | 6.67" in | 4.5" in | |
| Screen area | 107.4 cm2 | 55.8 cm2 | |
| Screen format | 20:9 (height:width) | 16:9 (height:width) | |
| Screen to body ratio | 84.6% | ||
| Screen resolution | 1080 x 2400 px | 480 x 854 px | |
| Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 395 PPI | 218 PPI | |
| Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | ||
| Other specs | - 450 nits typ. brightness | ||
| Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
| Rear camera, main | 64 MP, Quad | 5 MP, Single | |
| Camera specs | -64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF -8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm -5 MP, f/2.4, (macro) -2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
-5 MP, AF | |
| Functions | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash | |
| Video | 2160p@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS | 720p | |
| Front camera, selfie | 32 MP, Single | 2 MP, Single | |
| Specifications | 32 MP, (wide), 1/2.8'', 0.8µm | 2 MP | |
| Functions | HDR, panorama | ||
| Video | 1080p@30fps |
Performance
| Operating system - OS | Android 10.0; MIUI 11 | Android 5.1 (Lollipop) | |
| Chipset | - Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) | - Mediatek MT6735 (28 nm) | |
| CPU | - Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) | - Quad-core 1.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Mali-T720MP2 | |
| External memory | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSD, up to 32 GB | |
| Internal memory | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 8 GB, 1 GB RAM |
Benchmark
| Antutu 9 Total | 344216 | ||
| Antutu 8 Total | 278625 | ||
| GeekBench 5 Single Core | 590 | ||
| GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 1734 |
Communication and Connectivity
| SIM card | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Dual SIM | |
| Network | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE | |
| Bands | -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 -4G - LTE band 1(2100), 3(1800), 5(850), 8(900), 40(2300), 41(2500) |
-2G - GSM 900 / 1800 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 -3G - HSDPA 900 / 2100 -4G - LTE band 3(1800), 40(2300) |
|
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | |
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, hotspot | |
| GPS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC | ||
| NFC | |||
| USB | 2.0, Type-C 1.0 reversible connector | microUSB 2.0 | |
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 4.0, A2DP | |
| Harmful irradiation | SAR - 0.88 W/kg (head) 0.47 W/kg (body) |
Music and Audio
| Radio | FM radio, recording | FM radio | |
| Headphone jack | Yes | Yes | |
| Others |
Other features
| Sensors | - Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass , Infrared port | - Accelerometer, proximity | |
| Other extras |
- Fast charging 33W, 50% in 30 min - Splash-proof |
Reviews and Opinions on Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Max and Micromax Canvas Fire 4G Q411
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!