ZTE Blade A33S vs Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1
ZTE Blade A33S
Smartphone 2
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Smartphone 3
Differences between ZTE Blade A33S and Samsung Galaxy A33 5G - Which to Choose?
Reasons to consider the ZTE Blade A33S:
- Features a removable battery option for users who prefer the flexibility to carry spare batteries.
- Supports dual SIMs allowing the use of two different carrier networks simultaneously.
- Runs on the Android 12 Go edition, which is optimized for lower-performance devices.
- Comes with a 3.5mm headphone jack, preferable for users with traditional wired headphones.
- Infrared functionality included, which can be used to control other devices remotely.
- IP52 dust and water resistance to protect the device from limited dust ingress and dripping water.
- Lighter in weight compared to the Samsung Galaxy A33 5G, at 216g.
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy A33 5G:
- Supports 5G connectivity for faster internet speeds and better network performance.
- Boasts a larger battery capacity of 5000mAh, which can translate to longer battery life.
- Has a more powerful chipset Exynos 1280 (5nm) that may offer better performance.
- Featuring 48 MP quad-camera setup, with OIS and capability to record 4K video.
- Larger and higher resolution Super AMOLED+ display with higher pixel density (411ppi).
- Corning Gorilla Glass 5 screen protection for enhanced durability against scratches and drops.
- Fast charging support (25W) to quickly replenish the battery.
- Optical in-display fingerprint sensor for a convenient and modern unlocking experience.
- Higher AnTuTu benchmark score indicates substantially better overall performance.
- Includes NFC functionality for contactless payments and easy pairing with compatible devices.
- Comes with IP67 rating for dust and water resistance, providing greater protection compared to IP52.
ZTE Blade A33S or Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
| Brand and model | ZTE Blade A33S | Samsung Galaxy A33 5G | |
| Rating | (+0) | (+0) | |
| Release date | July, 2023 | 2022, March 17 | |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 160.0 x 78.0 x 10.0 mm | 6.3 x 6.3 x 3.07 in | 159.7 x 74 x 8.1 mm | 6.29 x 6.29 x 2.91 in | |
| Weight | 216 g | 7.62 oz | 186 g | 6.56 oz | |
| Body Build | Plastic | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back | |
| Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
| Colors | Blue, Green, Cyan | Black, White, Blue, Peach | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh, Li-Polymer, Removable | 5000 mAh, Li-Po, non-removable | |
| Approximate price | $ 299 | ||
| Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
| Technology | LCD IPS | Super AMOLED+ | |
| Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
| Display colors | 16M | 16M | |
| Screen size | 6.3" in | 6.4" in | |
| Screen area | 98.9 cm2 | ||
| Screen format | 20:9 (height:width) | 20:9 (height:width) | |
| Screen to body ratio | 80% | 83.7% | |
| Screen resolution | 720 x 1600 px | 1080 x 2400 px | |
| Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 278 PPI | 411 PPI | |
| Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | ||
| Other specs | - 90Hz | ||
| Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
| Rear camera, main | 5 MP, Single | 48 MP, Quad | |
| Camera specs | -5 MP, ƒ/ 2.2, (wide) | -48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0'', 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS -8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0'', 1.12µm -5 MP, f/2.4, (macro) -2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
|
| Functions | LED flash | LED flash, panorama, HDR | |
| Video | 1080p video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | |
| Front camera, selfie | 2 MP, Single | 13 MP, Single | |
| Specifications | 2 MP, ƒ/ | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1'', 1.12µm | |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
Performance
| Operating system - OS | Android 12 Snow Cone | Android 12, One UI 4.1 | |
| Chipset | - Spreadtrum Unisoc SC9863A (28 nm) | - Exynos 1280 (5 nm) | |
| CPU | - Octa-Core (4x Cortex A55 1.6 GHz + 4x Cortex A55 1.2 GHz) | - Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8322 | Mali-G68 | |
| External memory | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | |
| Internal memory | 2GB 32GB, 2GB · 32GB | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
Benchmark
| Antutu 9 Total | 115002 | 414998 | |
| GeekBench 6 Single Core | 835 | ||
| GeekBench 6 Multi Core | 1867 | ||
| GeekBench 6 OpenCL | 2294 | ||
| GeekBench 6 Vulkan | 2305 | ||
| GeekBench 5 Single Core | 653 | ||
| GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 1768 |
Communication and Connectivity
| SIM card | Dual SIM, dual stand-by (Nano SIM + Nano SIM) | Single SIM (Nano-SIM)Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | |
| Network | 2G / 3G / 4G / | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | |
| Bands | -2G - B2 (1900), B3 (1800), B5 (850), B8 (900) -3G - B1 (2100), B2 (1900), B4 (1700/2100 AWS A-F), B5 (850), B8 (900) -4G - B1 (2100), B3 (1800), B5 (850), B7 (2600), B8 (900), B20 (800), B28b (700), B28a (700), B40 (TDD 2300) |
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only) -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 -4G - LTE -5G - SA/NSA/Sub6 |
|
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A, 5G | ||
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| Wi-Fi | 802.11b, 802.11g, 802.11n,Wi-Fi Hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | |
| GPS | GPS, A-GPS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) | |
| USB | Yes | USB Type-C 2.0, USB On-The-Go | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.2, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE | |
| Harmful irradiation |
SAR - 0.35 W/kg (head) SAR EU - 0.57 W/kg (head) 1.59 W/kg (body) |
Music and Audio
| Radio | Yes | No | |
| Headphone jack | Yes | No |
Other features
| Sensors | - Proximity, Accelerometer , Infrared port | - Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity | |
| Other extras |
- Resistance certificates (dust, water) - -IP52 |
- Fast charging 25W - IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 mins) |
Reviews and Opinions on ZTE Blade A33S and Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!
