ZTE Blade A35 vs Xiaomi Redmi K80 Pro compare
Smartphone 1
Remove
ZTE Blade A35
Smartphone 2
Remove
Xiaomi Redmi K80 Pro
Smartphone 3
ZTE Blade A35 vs Xiaomi Redmi K80 Pro
What is the difference between the ZTE Blade A35 and Xiaomi Redmi K80 Pro? Which one is better? The answers to these questions and many more can be found here in this detailed comparison of the two phones. Discover the differences in specs between these two desirable devices, from screen size to battery life, in the table below. We have all the information you need to choose the best phone for you.
Common specs
| Brand and model | ZTE Blade A35 | Xiaomi Redmi K80 Pro | |
| Rating | (+) | (+) | |
| Review | |||
| Release date | 2024, October 09 | 2024, November 27 | |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 167.7 x 77.4 x 8.5 mm | 6.6 x 6.6 x 3.05 in | 160.3 x 75 x 8.4 mm | 6.31 x 6.31 x 2.95 in | |
| Weight | 0 g | 0 oz | 212 g | 7.48 oz | |
| Colors | Starry Black, Clover Green | Black, White, Mint, Lamborgini Green, Lamborgini Black | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh, , non-removable | 6000 mAh, Si/C, non-removable | |
| Approximate price | 80 EUR | 500 EUR |
Screen
| Technology | IPS LCD | OLED | |
| Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
| Display colors | 16M | 68B | |
| Screen size | 6.75" inc | 6.67" inc | |
| Screen area | 109.5 cm2 | 107.4 cm2 | |
| Screen format | 20:9 (height:width) | 20:9 (height:width) | |
| Screen to body ratio | 84.3% | 89.3% | |
| Screen resolution | 720 x 1612 px | 1440 x 3200 px | |
| Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 262 PPI | 526 PPI | |
| Screen protection | Longjing glass 2 | ||
| Other specs | - 90Hz - |
- 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1800 nits (HBM), 3200 nits (peak) - |
Camera and Video
| Rear camera, main | 8 MP, Single | 50 MP, Triple | |
| Camera specs | -8 MP | -50 MP, f/1.6, 24mm (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS -50 MP, f/2.0, 60mm (telephoto), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF (10cm - ∞), OIS, 2.5x optical zoom -32 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide) |
|
| Functions | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama | |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 8K@24fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 720p@1920fps, gyro-EIS | |
| Front camera, selfie | 2 MP, Single | 20 MP, Single | |
| Specifications | 2 MP (interpolated to 5 MP) | 20 MP, (wide) | |
| Functions | HDR | ||
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
Performance
| Operating system - OS | Android 14 (Go edition) | Android 15, HyperOS 2 | |
| Chipset | - Unisoc SC9863A1 (28 nm) | - Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm) | |
| Processor CPU | - Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) | - Octa-core (2x4.32 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M) | |
| Graphics processor GPU | IMG8322 | Adreno 830 | |
| External memory | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No | |
| Internal memory | 64GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
Benchmark
Communication and Connectivity
| SIM card | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | |
| Network | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | |
Show all network frequencies: |
|||
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G | |
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | |
| GPS | GPS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | |
| NFC | No | Yes | |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C, OTG | |
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 6.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless, LHDC 5 | |
Music and Audio
| Radio | No | ||
| Headphone jack | Yes | No | |
| Others | - 24-bit/192kHz Hi-Res & Hi-Res Wireless audio -Snapdragon Sound |
Other features
| Sensors | - Accelerometer | - Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, color spectrum , Infrared port | |
| Other extras |
- 120W Fast charging, Power Delivery 3.0, Quick Charge 3+, 100% in 28 min -50W Wireless charging - IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 2.5m for 30 min) |
Share on Share on
