Google Pixel 4 XL vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1
Google Pixel 4 XL
Smartphone 2
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Smartphone 3
Google Pixel 4 XL or Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
| Brand and model | Google Pixel 4 XL | Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
| Rating | (+0) | (+0) | |
| Release date | 2019, October | 2019, August | |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 160.4 x 75.1 x 8.2 mm | 6.31 x 6.31 x 2.96 in | 158.3 x 75.3 x 8.4 mm | 6.23 x 6.23 x 2.96 in | |
| Weight | 193 g | 6.81 oz | 190 g | 6.7 oz | |
| Body Build | Front/back glass (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Front/back glass (Gorilla Glass 5) | |
| Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
| Colors | Clearly White, Just Black, Oh So Orange | Neptune Blue, Moonlight White, Space Black | |
| Battery | 3700 mAh, Non-removable Li-Po | 4000 mAh, Non-removable Li-Po | |
| Approximate price | 900 EUR | 175 EUR | |
| Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
| Technology | P-OLED | IPS LCD | |
| Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
| Display colors | 16M | 16M | |
| Screen size | 6.3" in | 6.3" in | |
| Screen area | 98.0 cm2 | 97.4 cm2 | |
| Screen format | 19:9 (height:width) | 19.5:9 (height:width) | |
| Screen to body ratio | 81.3% | 81.7% | |
| Screen resolution | 1440 x 3040 px | 1080 x 2340 px | |
| Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 537 PPI | 409 PPI | |
| Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | |
| Other specs | - DCI-P3 100% -HDR -Always-on display -90Hz |
||
| Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
| Rear camera, main | 12.2 MP, Dual | 48 MP, Quad | |
| Camera specs | -12.2 MP, f/1.7, 28mm (wide), 1/2.55'', 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS -16 MP, f/2.4, 45mm (telephoto), 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 2x optical zoom |
-48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2", 0.8µm, PDAF -8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4", 1.12µm -2 MP, f/2.4, 1/5", 1.75µm (dedicated macro camera) -2 MP, f/2.4, 1/5", 1.75µm, depth sensor |
|
| Functions | Dual-LED flash, Auto-HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama | |
| Video | 2160p@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) | 2160p@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | |
| DxOMark Main Score | 112 | ||
| DxOMark Photo | 117 | ||
| DxOMark Video | 101 | ||
| Front camera, selfie | 8 MP, Dual | 13 MP, Single | |
| Specifications | 8 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), 1.22µm, no AF TOF 3D camera |
13 MP, f/2.0, 1.12µm | |
| Functions | Auto-HDR | HDR, panorama | |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps | |
| DxOMark Selfie Score | 92 | ||
| DxOMark Photo | 93 | ||
| DxOMark Video | 91 |
Performance
| Operating system - OS | Android 10 | Android 9.0 (Pie); MIUI 10 | |
| Chipset | - Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) | - Qualcomm SM6125 Snapdragon 665 (11 nm) | |
| CPU | - Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) | - Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | |
| GPU | Adreno 640 | Adreno 610 | |
| External memory | No | microSD, up to 256 GB (dedicated slot) | |
| Internal memory | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
Benchmark
| Antutu 10 Total | 227941 | ||
| Antutu 10 CPU | 84510 | ||
| Antutu 10 GPU | 34789 | ||
| Antutu 10 Mem | 51208 | ||
| Antutu 10 UX | 84510 | ||
| Antutu 8 Total | 425000 | 173592 | |
| Antutu 7 Total | |||
| GeekBench 6 Single Core | 868 | 323 | |
| GeekBench 6 Multi Core | 2484 | 1062 | |
| GeekBench 6 OpenCL | 293 | ||
| GeekBench 6 Vulkan | 2255 | 477 | |
| GeekBench 5 Single Core | 621 | 309 | |
| GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 2420 | 1328 | |
| GeekBench 4 Single Core | 2376 | 1499 | |
| GeekBench 4 Multi-Core | 9045 | 5543 |
Communication and Connectivity
| SIM card | Nano-SIM card & eSIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | |
| Network | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE | |
| Bands | -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 CDMA 800 / 1900 -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 CDMA2000 1xEV-DO -4G - LTE band 1(2100), 2(1900), 3(1800), 4(1700/2100), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 12(700), 13(700), 17(700), 20(800), 25(1900), 26(850), 28(700), 32(1500), 38(2600), 39(1900), 40(2300), 41(2500), 66(1700/2100), 71(600) - Global LTE band 1(2100), 2(1900), 3(1800), 4(1700/2100), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 12(700), 13(700), 14(700), 17(700), 18(800), 19(800), 20(800), 25(1900), 26(850), 28(700), 29(700), 30(2300), 38(2600), 39(1900), 40(2300), 41(2500), 46(5200), 48, 66(1700/2100), 71(600) - USA |
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 -4G - LTE band 1(2100), 2(1900), 3(1800), 4(1700/2100), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 20(800), 38(2600), 40(2300) LTE band 1(2100), 3(1800), 5(850), 8(900), 38(2600), 40(2300), 41(2500) |
|
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A (5CA) Cat18 1200/150 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE-A | |
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | |
| GPS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS | |
| NFC | Yes | ||
| USB | 3.1, Type-C 1.0 reversible connector | 2.0, Type-C 1.0 reversible connector, USB On-The-Go | |
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 4.2, A2DP, LE | |
| Harmful irradiation |
SAR - 0.26 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) SAR EU - 0.19 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
Music and Audio
| Radio | No | FM radio | |
| Headphone jack | No | Yes | |
| Others | - Active noise cancellation with dedicated mic |
Other features
| Sensors | - Face ID, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | - Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass , Infrared port | |
| Other extras |
- Fast battery charging 18W -USB Power Delivery 2.0 -QI wireless charging - IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins) |
- Fast battery charging 18W - Splash protection |
|
| Versions |
- Also known as Google Pixel XL4 |
Reviews and Opinions on Google Pixel 4 XL and Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!