Google Pixel 6 Pro vs Huawei P40 Pro Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Smartphone 2
Huawei P40 Pro
Smartphone 3
Google Pixel 6 Pro or Huawei P40 Pro Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
| Brand and model | Google Pixel 6 Pro | Huawei P40 Pro | |
| Rating | (+0) | (+1) | |
| Release date | 2021 | 2020, March 26 | |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 163.9 x 75.9 x 8.9 mm | 6.45 x 6.45 x 2.99 in | 158.2 x 72.6 x 9 mm | 6.23 x 6.23 x 2.86 in | |
| Weight | 210 g | 7.41 oz | 209 g | 7.37 oz | |
| Body Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | |
| Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
| Colors | Cloudy White, Sorta Sunny, Stormy Black | Silver Frost, Blush Gold, Deep Sea Blue, Ice White, Black | |
| Battery | 5003 mAh, Li-Ion, non-removable | 4200 mAh, Non-removable Li-Po | |
| Approximate price | 900 EUR | 970 EUR | |
| Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
| Technology | LTPO AMOLED | OLED | |
| Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
| Display colors | 16M | 16M | |
| Screen size | 6.71" in | 6.58" in | |
| Screen area | 110.5 cm2 | 105.2 cm2 | |
| Screen format | 19.5:9 (height:width) | 19.8:9 (height:width) | |
| Screen to body ratio | 88.8% | 91.6% | |
| Screen resolution | 1440 x 3120 px | 1200 x 2640 px | |
| Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 512 PPI | 441 PPI | |
| Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 | |
| Other specs | - Always-on display -120Hz -HDR10+ |
- HDR10 -90Hz refresh rate |
|
| Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
| Rear camera, main | 50 MP, Triple | 50 MP, Quad | |
| Camera specs | -50 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, Dual Pixel PDAF, Laser AF, OIS -48 MP, f/3.5, 104mm (telephoto), 1/2", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS, 4x optical zoom -12 MP, f/2.2, 17mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1.25µm |
-50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.28'', 2.44µm, omnidirectional PDAF, OIS -12 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom -40 MP, f/1.8, 18mm (ultrawide), 1/1.54'', PDAF -TOF 3D, (depth) |
|
| Functions | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama | Leica optics, LED flash, panorama, HDR | |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS | 2160p@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720@7680fps, 1080p@960fps, HDR; gyro-EIS | |
| DxOMark Main Score | 135 | 132 | |
| DxOMark Photo | 143 | 137 | |
| DxOMark Video | 115 | 113 | |
| Front camera, selfie | 11 MP, Single | 32 MP, Dual | |
| Specifications | 11.1 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.22µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, AF IR TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) |
|
| Functions | Auto-HDR, panorama | HDR | |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 2160p@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | |
| DxOMark Selfie Score | 102 | 103 | |
| DxOMark Photo | 107 | 108 | |
| DxOMark Video | 95 | 95 |
Performance
| Operating system - OS | Android 12 | Android 10.0 (AOSP + HMS); EMUI 10.1 | |
| Chipset | - Google Tensor (5 nm) | - HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G (7 nm+) | |
| CPU | - Octa-core (2x2.80 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | - Octa-core (2x2.86 GHz Cortex-A76 & 2x2.36 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) | |
| GPU | Mali-G78 MP20 | Mali-G76 MP16 | |
| External memory | No | NM (Nano Memory), up to 256GB (uses shared SIM slot) | |
| Internal memory | 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM |
Benchmark
| Antutu 10 Total | 805806 | ||
| Antutu 10 CPU | 216255 | ||
| Antutu 10 GPU | 247337 | ||
| Antutu 10 Mem | 142530 | ||
| Antutu 10 UX | 216255 | ||
| Antutu 9 Total | 687541 | 569211 | |
| Antutu 8 Total | 493316 | ||
| GeekBench 6 Single Core | 1332 | 929 | |
| GeekBench 6 Multi Core | 3071 | 2695 | |
| GeekBench 6 OpenCL | 6578 | 1898 | |
| GeekBench 6 Vulkan | 6858 | 4322 | |
| GeekBench 5 Single Core | 958 | 756 | |
| GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 2352 | 2949 |
Communication and Connectivity
| SIM card | Nano-SIM and/or eSIM | Single SIM (Nano-SIM/eSIM)Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | |
| Network | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | |
| Bands | -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 CDMA 800 / 1700 / 1900 -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 CDMA2000 1xEV-DO -4G - LTE -5G - SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave |
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 -3G - HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 -4G - 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - ELS-NX9 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - ELS-N04 -5G - 1, 3, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - ELS-NX9 1, 3, 5, 28, 38, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - ELS-N04 |
|
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A (CA), 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A, 5G | |
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | |
| GPS | Yes, with dual-band A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS, BDS | Yes, with dual-band A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | |
| NFC | Yes | Yes | |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | 3.1, Type-C 1.0 reversible connector, USB On-The-Go | |
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
Music and Audio
| Radio | No | No | |
| Headphone jack | No | No | |
| Others | - 32-bit/384kHz audio |
Other features
| Sensors | - Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | - Infrared face recognition, fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass , Infrared port | |
| Other extras |
- Ultra Wideband (UWB) support - Fast charging 30W, 50% in 30 min -Fast wireless charging 23W -Reverse wireless charging -USB Power Delivery 3.0 - IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins) |
- Fast charging 40W -Fast wireless charging 27W -Fast reverse wireless charging 27W - IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins) |
Reviews and Opinions on Google Pixel 6 Pro and Huawei P40 Pro
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!