Motorola Edge 40 Neo vs Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
Smartphone 2
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Smartphone 3
Differences between Motorola Edge 40 Neo and Samsung Galaxy A54 5G - Which to Choose?
Reasons to consider the Motorola Edge 40 Neo:
- Faster charging capability with 68W Fast charging, which offers 50% in just 15 min.
- Higher screen refresh rate at 144Hz, which can provide a smoother visual experience, especially in scrolling and gaming.
- P-OLED display technology, which is known for deep blacks and excellent contrast levels.
- Slightly larger screen size of 6.55 inches compared to the Galaxy A54 5G's 6.4 inches.
- Dual PDAF and OIS on the main camera for potentially better photo and video stability.
- IP68 dust/water resistant rating, allowing submersion up to 1.5m for 30 min.
- Higher AnTuTu 10 total benchmark score, if performance scores are taken into account (534597 vs 590616 - higher number can indicate better performance).
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy A54 5G:
- Triple camera setup, which includes a macro camera, providing more versatility in photography.
- Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset which may offer competitive performance and efficiency.
- Corning Gorilla Glass 5 for improved durability against scratches and drops.
- Presence of a barometer sensor (USA only) which can be useful for apps that measure altitude or track weather changes.
- Has the option for expandable storage with microSDXC (using shared SIM slot).
- Official AnTuTu 10 benchmark score is higher than Motorola Edge 40 Neo's score, which may suggest better overall performance (590616 vs 534597).
- Has a market-dependent NFC feature which might be important for contactless payments and connectivity depending on the region.
When choosing between these two smartphones, it is important to consider what features are most important for your daily use. Each phone has its own set of strengths. For example, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo offers a higher refresh rate display and faster charging, while the Samsung Galaxy A54 5G provides more versatile photography options and expandable storage. Performance scores from benchmarks such as AnTuTu should be considered alongside real-world usage and requirements. Other factors such as build quality, UI experience, and price should also be taken into account. Please adjust the comparison based on the most up-to-date information available, as the above comparison relies on the data provided within the question and the assistant's knowledge as of its cutoff date.
Motorola Edge 40 Neo or Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
| Brand and model | Motorola Edge 40 Neo | Samsung Galaxy A54 5G | |
| Rating | (+2) | (+0) | |
| Release date | 2023, September 14 | 2023, March 14 | |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm | 6.28 x 6.28 x 2.83 in | 158.2 x 76.7 x 8.2 mm | 6.23 x 6.23 x 3.02 in | |
| Weight | 170 g | 6 oz | 202 g | 7.13 oz | |
| Body Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame | |
| Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
| Colors | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz | Lime, Graphite, Violet, White | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh, Li-Po, non-removable | 5000 mAh, Li-Po, non-removable | |
| Approximate price | 300 EUR | 400 EUR | |
| Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
| Technology | P-OLED | Super AMOLED | |
| Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
| Display colors | 1B | 16M | |
| Screen size | 6.55" in | 6.4" in | |
| Screen area | 103.6 cm2 | 100.5 cm2 | |
| Screen format | 20:9 (height:width) | 19.5:9 (height:width) | |
| Screen to body ratio | 90.1% | 82.9% | |
| Screen resolution | 1080 x 2400 px | 1080 x 2340 px | |
| Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 402 PPI | 403 PPI | |
| Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | |
| Other specs | - 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) - |
- 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) | |
| Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
| Rear camera, main | 50 MP, Dual | 50 MP, Triple | |
| Camera specs | -50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.5", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS -13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm, PDAF |
-50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS -12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm -5 MP, f/2.4, (macro) |
|
| Functions | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR | |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps | |
| DxOMark Main Score | 104 | ||
| DxOMark Photo | 106 | ||
| DxOMark Video | 115 | ||
| Front camera, selfie | 32 MP, Single | 32 MP, Single | |
| Specifications | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 0.7µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8'', 0.8µm | |
| Functions | HDR | HDR | |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
Performance
| Operating system - OS | Android 13, planned upgrade to Android 14 | Android 13, One UI 5.1 | |
| Chipset | - MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6nm) | - Exynos 1380 (5 nm) | |
| CPU | - Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | - Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC3 | Mali-G68 MP5 | |
| External memory | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | |
| Internal memory | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
Benchmark
| Antutu 10 Total | 534597 | 590616 | |
| Antutu 10 CPU | 191351 | ||
| Antutu 10 GPU | 136765 | ||
| Antutu 10 Mem | 112999 | ||
| Antutu 10 UX | 191351 | ||
| Antutu 9 Total | 521008 | 512020 | |
| GeekBench 6 Single Core | 977 | ||
| GeekBench 6 Multi Core | 2760 | ||
| GeekBench 6 OpenCL | 3007 | ||
| GeekBench 6 Vulkan | 3015 | ||
| GeekBench 5 Single Core | 3195 | 777 | |
| GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 7991 | 2600 |
Communication and Connectivity
| SIM card | Nano-SIM, eSIM or Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Single SIM (Nano-SIM, eSIM) or Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | |
| Network | 2G / 3G / 4G / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | |
| Bands | -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only) -3G - HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 -4G - 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 -5G - 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only) -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 -4G - LTE -5G - SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave |
|
| Speed | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G | |
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) | |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | |
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE | |
| Harmful irradiation |
SAR - 0.81 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) SAR EU - 0.69 W/kg (head) 1.34 W/kg (body) |
Music and Audio
| Radio | No | No | |
| Headphone jack | No | No | |
| Others |
Other features
| Sensors | - Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | - Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (USA only) | |
| Other extras |
- 68W Fast charging, 50% in 15 min - IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) |
- Fast charging 25W - IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 mins) |
Reviews and Opinions on Motorola Edge 40 Neo and Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!
