Samsung Galaxy A22 vs Tecno Camon 18 Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1
Samsung Galaxy A22
Smartphone 2
Tecno Camon 18
Smartphone 3
Samsung Galaxy A22 or Tecno Camon 18 Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
| Brand and model | Samsung Galaxy A22 | Tecno Camon 18 | |
| Rating | (+) | (+) | |
| Release date | 2021, June 03 | 2021, November 23 | |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 159.3 x 73.6 x 8.4 mm | 6.27 x 6.27 x 2.9 in | 168.9 x 76.7 x 8.8 mm | 6.65 x 6.65 x 3.02 in | |
| Weight | 186 g | 6.56 oz | 0 g | 0 oz | |
| Body Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | ||
| Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
| Colors | Black, White, Mint, Violet | Dusk Gray, Ceramic White, Iris purple | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh, Li-Po, non-removable | 5000 mAh, Li-Po, non-removable | |
| Approximate price | 200 EUR | 170 EUR | |
| Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
| Technology | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD | |
| Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
| Display colors | 16M | 16M | |
| Screen size | 6.4" in | 6.8" in | |
| Screen area | 98.9 cm2 | 109.8 cm2 | |
| Screen format | 20:9 (height:width) | ||
| Screen to body ratio | 84.3% | 84.8% | |
| Screen resolution | 720 x 1600 px | 1080 x 2460 px | |
| Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 274 PPI | 0 PPI | |
| Other specs | - 90Hz -600 nits (HDR) |
- 90Hz -550 nits (typ) |
|
| Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
| Rear camera, main | 48 MP, Quad | 48 MP, Triple | |
| Camera specs | -48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS -8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm -2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) -2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
-48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF -2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) -2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
|
| Functions | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR | |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps | |
| Front camera, selfie | 13 MP, Single | 16 MP, Single | |
| Specifications | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm | 16 MP, (wide) | |
| Functions | Dual-LED flash | ||
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
Performance
| Operating system - OS | Android 11, One UI Core 3.1 | Android 11, HIOS 8.0 | |
| Chipset | - Mediatek Helio G80 (12 nm) | - Mediatek MT6769H Helio G88 (12nm) | |
| CPU | - Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz & 6x1.8 GHz) | - Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G52 MC2 | |
| External memory | |||
| Internal memory | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
Benchmark
| Antutu 9 Total | 230145 | 255412 | |
| Antutu 8 Total | 200214 | ||
| GeekBench 6 Single Core | 381 | ||
| GeekBench 6 Multi Core | 1267 | ||
| GeekBench 5 Single Core | 345 | 375 | |
| GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 1278 | 1353 |
Communication and Connectivity
| SIM card | Single SIM (Nano-SIM)Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | |
| Network | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE | |
| Bands | -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM only) -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 -4G - LTE |
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 -4G - LTE |
|
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A | |
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | Yes | |
| GPS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | Yes, with A-GPS | |
| NFC | Yes | Yes | |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, USB On-The-Go | |
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | Yes | |
| Harmful irradiation |
SAR EU - 0.52 W/kg (head) 1.59 W/kg (body) |
Music and Audio
| Radio | FM radio | ||
| Headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
Other features
| Sensors | - Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | - Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | |
| Other extras |
- Fast charging 15W |
- Fast charging 18W |
|
| Versions |
- Also known as Samsung Galaxy A22 4G |
Reviews and Opinions on Samsung Galaxy A22 and Tecno Camon 18
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!
