Samsung Galaxy F62 vs Samsung Galaxy S9 Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1
Samsung Galaxy F62
Smartphone 2
Samsung Galaxy S9
Smartphone 3
Samsung Galaxy F62 or Samsung Galaxy S9 Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
Brand and model | Samsung Galaxy F62 | Samsung Galaxy S9 | |
Rating | 0) | (+0) | (+|
Release date | 2021, February 15 | 2018, February | |
Dimensions (HxWxD) | 163.9 x 76.3 x 9.5 mm | 6.45 x 6.45 x 3 in | 147.7 x 68.7 x 8.5 mm | 5.81 x 5.81 x 2.7 in | |
Weight | 218 g | 7.69 oz | 163 g | 5.75 oz | |
Body Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Front/back glass (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | |
Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
Colors | Laser Green, Laser Gray, Laser Blue | Midnight Black, Coral Blue, Titanium Gray, Lilac Purple, Burgundy Red, Sunrise Gold, Ice Blue | |
Battery | 7000 mAh, Li-Po, non-removable | 3000 mAh, Non-removable Li-Ion | |
Approximate price | 270 EUR | 490 EUR | |
Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
Technology | Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED | |
Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
Display colors | 16M | 16M | |
Screen size | 6.7" in | 5.8" in | |
Screen area | 108.4 cm2 | 84.8 cm2 | |
Screen format | 20:9 (height:width) | 18.5:9 (height:width) | |
Screen to body ratio | 86.7% | 83.6% | |
Screen resolution | 1080 x 2400 px | 1440 x 2960 px | |
Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 393 PPI | 570 PPI | |
Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | ||
Other specs | - 420 nits (peak) | - HDR10 -3D Touch (home button only) -Always-on display |
|
Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
Rear camera, main | 64 MP, Quad | 12 MP, Single | |
Camera specs | -64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF -12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide) -5 MP, f/2.4, (macro) -5 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
-12 MP, f/1.5-2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.55'', 1.4µm, OIS, dual pixel PDAF | |
Functions | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama | |
Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 2160p@60fps, 1080p@240fps, 720p@960fps, HDR, dual-video rec. | |
Front camera, selfie | 32 MP, Single | 8 MP, Single | |
Specifications | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 8 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/3.6'', 1.22µm, AF | |
Functions | HDR | Dual video call, Auto-HDR | |
Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps | |
DxOMark Selfie Score | 81 | ||
DxOMark Photo | 81 | ||
DxOMark Video | 81 |
Performance
Operating system - OS | Android 11, One UI 3.1 | Android 8.0 (Oreo) | |
Chipset | - Exynos 9825 (7 nm) | - Exynos 9810 Octa (10 nm) - Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 (10 nm) - USA/LATAM, China |
|
CPU | - Octa-core (2x2.73 GHz Exynos M4 & 2x2.40 GHz Cortex-A75 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) | - Octa-core (4x2.7 GHz Mongoose M3 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) - EMEA -Octa-core (4x2.8 GHz Kryo 385 Gold & 4x1.7 GHz Kryo 385 Silver) - USA/LATAM, China |
|
GPU | Mali-G76 MP12 | Mali-G72 MP18 - EMEA Adreno 630 - USA/LATAM, China |
|
External memory | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSD, up to 512 GB (uses SIM 2 slot) - dual SIM model only | |
Internal memory | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64/128/256 GB, 4 GB RAM |
Benchmark
Antutu 9 Total | 376125 | ||
Antutu 8 Total | 302547 | 284449 | |
Antutu 7 Total | |||
GeekBench 6 Single Core | 622 | 510 | |
GeekBench 6 Multi Core | 1746 | 1725 | |
GeekBench 6 OpenCL | 1550 | 1987 | |
GeekBench 6 Vulkan | 4080 | 1835 | |
GeekBench 5 Single Core | 506 | 469 | |
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 1589 | 1957 | |
GeekBench 4 Single Core | 3288 | ||
GeekBench 4 Multi-Core | 8240 | ||
GeekBench 4 RenderScript | 8705 | ||
GeekBench 4 Battery | 3960 |
Communication and Connectivity
SIM card | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Single SIM (Nano-SIM)Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | |
Network | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE | |
Bands | -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 -4G - LTE |
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only) CDMA 800 / 1900 - USA -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global, USA CDMA2000 1xEV-DO - USA -4G - LTE band 1(2100), 2(1900), 3(1800), 4(1700/2100), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 12(700), 13(700), 17(700), 18(800), 19(800), 20(800), 25(1900), 26(850), 28(700), 32(1500), 38(2600), 39(1900), 40(2300), 41(2500), 66(1700/2100) - Global LTE band 1(2100), 2(1900), 3(1800), 4(1700/2100), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 12(700), 13(700), 14(700), 17(700), 18(800), 19(800), 20(800), 25(1900), 26(850), 28(700), 29(700), 30(2300), 38(2600), 39(1900), 40(2300), 41(2500), 46, 66(1700/2100), 71(600) - USA |
|
Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A (6CA) Cat18 1200/200 Mbps | |
GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
Edge | Yes | Yes | |
Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | |
GPS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | |
NFC | Yes | Yes | |
USB | USB Type-C 2.0, USB On-The-Go | 3.1, Type-C 1.0 reversible connector | |
Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX | |
Harmful irradiation | SAR - 0.74 W/kg (head) |
Music and Audio
Radio | FM radio, recording | FM radio (USA & Canada only) | |
Headphone jack | Yes | Yes | |
Others | - 32-bit/384kHz audio -Active noise cancellation with dedicated mic |
Other features
Sensors | - Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | - Iris scanner, fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, heart rate, SpO2 | |
Other extras |
- Fast charging 25W -Reverse charging |
- Samsung DeX (desktop experience support) - -ANT+ -Bixby natural language commands and dictation - Fast battery charging (Quick Charge 2.0) -Qi/PMA wireless charging (market dependent) - Samsung Pay (Visa, MasterCard certified) -IP68 dust/water proof (up to 1.5m for 30 mins) |
|
Versions |
- Versions: G960F (Europe, Global Single-SIM); G960F/DS (Europe, Global Dual-SIM); G960U (USA); G960W (Canada); G9600 (China, LATAM) |
Reviews and Opinions on Samsung Galaxy F62 and Samsung Galaxy S9
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!