Samsung Galaxy F62
- Model: Galaxy F62
- Brand: Samsung
- Rating: 4.06 out of 5 (34 votes)
- Price: 270 EUR
- Year of manufacture: 2021
- Dimensions: 163.9 x 76.3 x 9.5 mm
- Weight: 218 g
- Chipset: Exynos 9825 (7 nm)
- Built-in memory: 128GB 6GB RAM
- Screen: Super AMOLED Plus 6.7 inches
- Battery: 7000 mAh
- Rear camera: Quad, 64MP
- Front camera: Single, 32MP
🛒 BUY
Compare Samsung Galaxy F62 with other models:
Samsung Galaxy F62 specs
Common | Price | Design | Screen | Hardware | Memory | Software | Main Camera | Selfie camera | Cellular | Connectivity | Battery | Audio | Sensors | Performance Benchmark
Copy all specifications by clicking here
Common
| Brand and model | |
| Launch date | 2021, February 15 |
Price
| First price | 270 EUR |
Design
| Height | 6.45 in (163.9 mm) |
| Width | 3 in ( 76.3 mm) |
| Depth | 0.37 in ( 9.5 mm) |
| Weight | 7.69 oz (218 grams) |
| Build materials | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Water resistant |
|
| Colors | Laser Green, Laser Gray, Laser Blue |
| Case | Buy a case from Amazon |
Screen
| Technology | Super AMOLED Plus |
| Size | 6.7 in |
| Screen Area | 108.4 cm2 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 px |
| Points per inch | 393 PPI |
| Color Depth | 16M |
| Ratio (height:width) | 20:9 |
| Ratio (screen:body) | 86.7% |
| Additional Features | -420 nits (peak) |
| Screen protector | Buy a screen protector from Amazon |
Hardware
| Chipset | ||
| CPU | - Octa-core (2x2.73 GHz Exynos M4 & 2x2.40 GHz Cortex-A75 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) |
|
| GPU | - Mali-G76 MP12 |
|
Memory
| Internal Memory | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| Memory Card Slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
Software
| Operating System (OS) | Android 11, One UI 3.1 |
| User Interface |
|
Main Camera
| Number of Cameras | Quad |
| Specs |
-64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Video Recording | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
Selfie camera
| Number of Cameras | Single |
| Specs | -32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Features | HDR |
| Video Recording | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
Cellular
| Bands | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
|
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 -4G - LTE |
|
| SIM Card | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A |
| SAR | 0.74 W/kg (head) |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot |
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| GPS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| NFC | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, USB On-The-Go |
Battery
| Capacity | 7000 mAh |
| Type | Li-Po, non-removable |
| Charging |
-Fast charging 25W |
Audio
| Headphone Jack | Yes |
| Radio | FM radio, recording |
Sensors
Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
Other specifications
| Others |
|
Performance Benchmark
Antutu Score
| Antutu 9 Score | 376125 (Position 608 out of 1347) |
| Antutu 8 Score | 302547 (Position 326 out of 1146) |
| Antutu 9 Ranking | |
|---|---|
| 602. Nokia G42 | 380349 |
| 603. Honor Play 30M 5G | 380006 |
| 604. TCL 30 | 380005 |
| 605. vivo X50 Pro | 379926 |
| 606. BLU F91 | 379478 |
| 607. Nokia X30 | 377124 |
| 608. Samsung Galaxy F62 | 376125 |
| 609. Samsung Galaxy M23 | 375870 |
| 610. Tecno Pova 5 | 375849 |
| 611. BLU F92e | 373786 |
| 612. Honor Play 4T Pro | 371124 |
| 613. Samsung Galaxy A24 4G | 370758 |
| 614. Ulefone Armor 20WT | 370010 |
| Antutu 8 Ranking | |
|---|---|
| 320. Tecno Camon 17 Pro | 305100 |
| 321. Motorola Razr 2020 5G | 304739 |
| 322. Asus ROG Phone | 304258 |
| 323. Oppo Reno4 Pro | 303785 |
| 324. Honor 20S | 303283 |
| 325. Apple iPhone 8 Plus | 302943 |
| 326. Samsung Galaxy F62 | 302547 |
| 327. Umidigi Bison GT2 | 302505 |
| 328. UMIDIGI Bison GT | 302503 |
| 329. Realme 7 (Global) | 302319 |
| 330. Apple iPhone X | 302245 |
| 331. Oppo A73 | 302002 |
| 332. ZTE Blade 20 5G | 301983 |
| GeekBench 6 Single Core | 622 (Position 291 out of 578) |
| GeekBench 6 Multi Core | 1746 (Position 275 out of 577) |
| GeekBench 6 Vulkan | 4080 (Position 71 out of 282) |
| GeekBench 6 OpenCL | 1550 (Position 182 out of 325) |
| GeekBench 5 Single Core | 506 (Position 832 out of 1884) |
| GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 1589 (Position 862 out of 1873) |
| GeekBench 6 Single Core Ranking | |
|---|---|
| 285. Samsung Galaxy M51 | 644 |
| 286. Realme 8 | 639 |
| 287. Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro | 636 |
| 288. Samsung Galaxy A71 | 635 |
| 289. vivo V15 Pro | 635 |
| 290. Realme 7 | 628 |
| 291. Samsung Galaxy F62 | 622 |
| 292. Xiaomi Poco X2 | 621 |
| 293. Apple iPhone SE | 614 |
| 294. Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ | 613 |
| 295. Samsung Galaxy A70 | 607 |
| 296. Asus ROG Phone | 603 |
| 297. Apple iPhone 6s Plus | 602 |
| GeekBench 6 Multi Core Ranking | |
|---|---|
| 269. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G | 1779 |
| 270. Nokia X20 | 1775 |
| 271. vivo Y36 5G | 1761 |
| 272. Realme 7 | 1761 |
| 273. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro | 1755 |
| 274. Google Pixel 4a 5G | 1750 |
| 275. Samsung Galaxy F62 | 1746 |
| 276. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC | 1732 |
| 277. Sony Xperia XZ2 | 1726 |
| 278. Samsung Galaxy S9 | 1725 |
| 279. LG V35 ThinQ | 1724 |
| 280. vivo NEX S | 1723 |
| 281. Realme 6 Pro | 1720 |
| GeekBench 5 Single Core Ranking | |
|---|---|
| 826. Samsung Galaxy A72 | 508 |
| 827. Sony Xperia XZ3 | 508 |
| 828. Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium | 508 |
| 829. Tecno Camon 19 Pro | 507 |
| 830. Infinix Note 10 Pro | 507 |
| 831. HTC U12+ | 507 |
| 832. Samsung Galaxy F62 | 506 |
| 833. AGM Glory G1S | 505 |
| 834. Oukitel WP17 | 505 |
| 835. Nokia X20 | 505 |
| 836. BLU G90 Pro | 505 |
| 837. Nokia X100 | 504 |
| 838. Nokia 9 PureView | 504 |
| GeekBench 5 Multi Core Ranking | |
|---|---|
| 856. Samsung Galaxy A14 4G | 1600 |
| 857. Tecno Camon 17 Pro | 1600 |
| 858. Tecno Camon 16 Premier | 1600 |
| 859. Motorola Moto G9 Plus | 1600 |
| 860. vivo V21e 5G | 1595 |
| 861. Sony Xperia 10 III | 1594 |
| 862. Samsung Galaxy F62 | 1589 |
| 863. Xiaomi Poco X2 | 1588 |
| 864. vivo Y73 | 1587 |
| 865. Motorola Moto G32 | 1582 |
| 866. Nokia 8 | 1582 |
| 867. Motorola Moto Z3 | 1580 |
| 868. Micromax In note 2 | 1576 |
Review of Samsung Galaxy F62
The competition in the middle price range is fierce. Therefore, when the South Korean company introduced the Samsung Galaxy F62 in February 2021, all eyes were on it. The smartphone has an AMOLED screen and a flagship processor. However, the main emphasis is on the capacity of its battery. If you are looking for a record battery life, this model is a hit. In this line of thought, the Samsung Galaxy F62 is the answer to the desires of millions of users. They need to be sure that they will not use the charger for several hours.
Read the entire review
Samsung Galaxy F62 video reviews
Samsung Galaxy F62 Reviews and Opinions
Be the first to share your opinion! Do you have any observations or personal experiences you would like to share? Your insights are valuable to us and our community. Leave a comment, and let's discuss the pros and cons of this model together!
