Samsung Galaxy S10e vs Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Smartphone 2
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Smartphone 3
Samsung Galaxy S10e or Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite Specs Comparison
or
Common specs
| Brand and model | Samsung Galaxy S10e | Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite | |
| Rating | (+) | (+) | |
| Release date | 2019, February | 2020, January | |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 142.2 x 69.9 x 7.9 mm | 5.6 x 5.6 x 2.75 in | 162.5 x 75.6 x 8.1 mm | 6.4 x 6.4 x 2.98 in | |
| Weight | 150 g | 5.29 oz | 186 g | 6.56 oz | |
| Body Build | Front/back glass (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | ||
| Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
| Colors | Prism White, Prism Black, Prism Green, Prism Blue, Canary Yellow, Flamingo Pink | Prism White, Prism Black, Prism Blue | |
| Battery | 3100 mAh, Non-removable Li-Ion | 4500 mAh, Non-removable Li-Po | |
| Approximate price | 780 EUR | 650 EUR | |
| Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
| Technology | Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED | |
| Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
| Display colors | 16M | 16M | |
| Screen size | 5.8" in | 6.7" in | |
| Screen area | 82.8 cm2 | 107.8 cm2 | |
| Screen format | 19:9 (height:width) | 20:9 (height:width) | |
| Screen to body ratio | 83.3% | 87.8% | |
| Screen resolution | 1080 x 2280 px | 1080 x 2400 px | |
| Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 438 PPI | 394 PPI | |
| Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | ||
| Other specs | - HDR10+ -Always-on display |
- Always-on display -HDR10+ |
|
| Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
| Rear camera, main | 12 MP, Dual | 48 MP, Triple | |
| Camera specs | -12 MP, f/1.5-2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, Dual Pixel PDAF, OIS - 16 MP, f/2.2, 12mm (ultrawide), 1.0µm |
-48 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, Super Steady OIS -12 MP, f/2.2, 12mm (ultrawide) -5 MP, f/2.4, 25mm (macro), 1/5.0", 1.12µm |
|
| Functions | LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR | |
| Video | 2160p@60fps, 1080p@240fps, 720p@960fps, HDR, dual-video rec. | 2160p@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS | |
| Front camera, selfie | 10 MP, Single | 32 MP, Single | |
| Specifications | 10 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1.22µm, Dual Pixel PDAF | 32 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/2.8'', 0.8µm | |
| Functions | Dual video call, Auto-HDR | HDR | |
| Video | 2160p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
Performance
| Operating system - OS | Android 9.0 (Pie) | Android 10.0; One UI 2.1 | |
| Chipset | - Exynos 9820 Octa (8 nm) - Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) - USA/LATAM, China |
- Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) | |
| CPU | - Octa-core (2x2.73 GHz Mongoose M4 & 2x2.31 GHz Cortex-A75 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) - EMEA -Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.41 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) - USA/LATAM, China |
- Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) | |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MP12 - EMEA Adreno 640 - USA/LATAM, China |
Adreno 640 | |
| External memory | microSD, up to 512 GB (uses SIM 2 slot) - dual SIM model only | microSD, up to 1 TB | |
| Internal memory | 256 GB, 8 GB RAM 128 GB, 6 GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM |
Benchmark
| Antutu 8 Total | 409277 | 452004 | |
| Antutu 7 Total | |||
| GeekBench 5 Single Core | 742 | 688 | |
| GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 2027 | 2545 | |
| GeekBench 4 Single Core | 4253 | ||
| GeekBench 4 Multi-Core | 9787 | ||
| GeekBench 4 RenderScript | 7336 |
Communication and Connectivity
| SIM card | Single SIM (Nano-SIM)Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Single SIM (Nano-SIM)Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | |
| Network | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE | |
| Bands | -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only) CDMA 800 / 1900 - USA -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global, USA CDMA2000 1xEV-DO - USA -4G - LTE band 1(2100), 2(1900), 3(1800), 4(1700/2100), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 12(700), 13(700), 17(700), 18(800), 19(800), 20(800), 25(1900), 26(850), 28(700), 32(1500), 38(2600), 39(1900), 40(2300), 41(2500), 66(1700/2100) - Global LTE band 1(2100), 2(1900), 3(1800), 4(1700/2100), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 12(700), 13(700), 14(700), 17(700), 18(800), 19(800), 20(800), 25(1900), 26(850), 28(700), 29(700), 30(2300), 38(2600), 39(1900), 40(2300), 41(2500), 46, 66(1700/2100), 71(600) - USA |
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only) -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 -4G - LTE (unspecified) |
|
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A (7CA) Cat20 2000/150 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A | |
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
| Edge | Yes | Yes | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | |
| GPS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | |
| NFC | Yes | Yes | |
| USB | 3.1, Type-C 1.0 reversible connector | 2.0, Type-C 1.0 reversible connector | |
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.0, A2DP, LE | |
| Harmful irradiation |
SAR - 0.69 W/kg (head) 0.93 W/kg (body) SAR EU - 0.49 W/kg (head) 1.52 W/kg (body) |
Music and Audio
| Radio | FM radio (USA & Canada only) | ||
| Headphone jack | Yes | No | |
| Others | - 32-bit/384kHz audio -Active noise cancellation with dedicated mic -Dolby Atmos/AKG sound |
- Active noise cancellation with dedicated mic |
Other features
| Sensors | - Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | - Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | |
| Other extras |
- ANT+ -Bixby natural language commands and dictation - Fast battery charging 15W -Fast wireless charging 15W -Power bank/Reverse wireless charging 9W - Samsung Pay (Visa, MasterCard certified) -IP68 dust/water proof (up to 1.5m for 30 mins) |
- ANT+ - Fast battery charging 45W |
|
| Versions |
- Versions: SM-G770F/DS (Global); SM-G770F/DSM (Russia, India) |
Reviews and Opinions on Samsung Galaxy S10e and Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
If you had to recommend one of these phones to a friend, which one would it be and why? Share your arguments using the Add Opinion button!