Samsung Galaxy S22 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A73 5G Comparison and Differences
Smartphone 1

Samsung Galaxy S22 5G
Smartphone 2

Samsung Galaxy A73 5G
Smartphone 3
Differences between Samsung Galaxy S22 5G and Samsung Galaxy A73 5G - Which to Choose?
If you are among those who are in the process of choosing a new smartphone, you may have wondered which of Samsung's new models is best for you - the Galaxy S22 5G or the Galaxy A73 5G? In this post, we'll compare the specs of the two devices to help you make a better choice.
For starters, the two phones have very similar specs. Both models feature powerful 5G connections, making them suitable for future communication needs. They also feature fast chargers that allow charging up to 25W, making them ideal for people who travel often and can't stay in one place for long.
The biggest difference between the Galaxy S22 5G and Galaxy A73 5G has to do with their processors. The Galaxy S22 5G features the new Exynos 2200, which is based on the 4-nanometer manufacturing process. This chip includes eight cores in two different configurations, which includes a faster and more efficient Cortex-X2 core, providing greater performance. Equally important, the Galaxy S22 5G offers dual graphics processing that delivers higher-quality graphic images and more efficient video processing. Additionally, the phone is optimized with Android 12, One UI 4.1. The Galaxy A73 5G also features a powerful processor - the Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G. This processor is based on the 6-nanometer manufacturing process and delivers performance that is comparable to most of the higher price-end phones.
Graphics processing is provided by the Adreno 642L, which again offers good performance in graphics processing. To this, we must add that the Galaxy S22 5G has a better camera that includes a tri-lens (50 MP, 10 MP and 12 MP) and can capture 8K videos.
However, if you're more of a selfie-fan, the Galaxy A73 5G mobile phone has a higher quality front-facing camera - 32 MP, which could also intrigue you. In conclusion, there is no right or wrong decision when it comes to choosing between the Samsung Galaxy S22 5G and the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G. If you want more performance and true high end, the Galaxy S22 5G could be the right choice for you. If you want a more affordable phone that offers the best possible camera quality, then the Galaxy A73 5G could be the phone for you.
Samsung Galaxy S22 5G or Samsung Galaxy A73 5G Specs Comparison
Common specs
Brand and model | Samsung Galaxy S22 5G | Samsung Galaxy A73 5G | |
Rating | 0) | (+1) | (+|
Release date | 2022, February 09 | 2022, March 17 | |
Dimensions (HxWxD) | 146 x 70.6 x 7.6 mm | 5.75 x 5.75 x 2.78 in | 163.7 x 76.1 x 7.6 mm | 6.44 x 6.44 x 3 in | |
Weight | 167 g | 5.89 oz | 181 g | 6.38 oz | |
Body Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus+), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus+), aluminum frame | ||
Case | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon | |
Colors | Phantom Black, White, Pink Gold, Green, Graphite, Sky Blue, Violet, Cream | Gray, Mint, White | |
Battery | 3700 mAh, Li-Ion, non-removable | 5000 mAh, Li-Ion, non-removable | |
Approximate price | $ 799.99 | 499 EUR | |
Check price | from Amazon | from Amazon |
Screen
Technology | Dynamic AMOLED 2X | Super AMOLED Plus | |
Touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | capacitive touchscreen | |
Display colors | 16M | 16M | |
Screen size | 6.1" in | 6.7" in | |
Screen area | 90.1 cm2 | 108.4 cm2 | |
Screen format | 19.5:9 (height:width) | 20:9 (height:width) | |
Screen to body ratio | 87.4% | 87.0% | |
Screen resolution | 1080 x 2340 px | 1080 x 2400 px | |
Screen PPI /points per inch/ | 425 PPI | 393 PPI | |
Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | |
Other specs | - 120Hz -HDR10+ -1300 nits (peak) -Always-on display |
- 120Hz -800 nits (HBM) |
|
Screen protector | buy from Amazon | buy from Amazon |
Camera and Video
Rear camera, main | 50 MP, Triple | 108 MP, Quad | |
Camera specs | -50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, Dual Pixel PDAF, OIS -10 MP, f/2.4, 70mm (telephoto), 1/3.94", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom -12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.55" 1.4µm, Super Steady video |
-108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS -12 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) -5 MP, f/2.4, (macro) -5 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
|
Functions | LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR | |
Video | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, 720p@960fps, HDR10+, stereo sound rec., gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS | |
DxOMark Main Score | 126 | ||
DxOMark Photo | 130 | ||
DxOMark Video | 110 | ||
Front camera, selfie | 10 MP, Single | 32 MP, Single | |
Specifications | 10 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.24'', 1.22µm, Dual Pixel PDAF | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8'', 0.8µm | |
Functions | Dual video call, Auto-HDR | HDR | |
Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
Performance
Operating system - OS | Android 12, One UI 4.1 | Android 12, One UI 4.1 | |
Chipset | - Exynos 2200 (4 nm) - Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) - USA/China |
- Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) | |
CPU | - Octa-core (1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A510) - International Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) - USA/China |
- Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 670 & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 670) | |
GPU | Xclipse 920 - International Adreno 730 - USA/China | Adreno 642L | |
External memory | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | |
Internal memory | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
Benchmark
Antutu 10 Total | 943527 | ||
Antutu 10 CPU | 289312 | ||
Antutu 10 GPU | 292139 | ||
Antutu 10 Mem | 171097 | ||
Antutu 10 UX | 289312 | ||
Antutu 9 Total | 889324 | 489342 | |
GeekBench 6 Single Core | 922 | ||
GeekBench 6 Multi Core | 2785 | ||
GeekBench 6 OpenCL | 1928 | ||
GeekBench 6 Vulkan | 2295 | ||
GeekBench 5 Single Core | 710 | ||
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core | 2088 |
Communication and Connectivity
SIM card | Single SIM (Nano-SIM)Dual SIM (2 Nano-SIMs + eSIM, dual stand-by) | Single SIM (Nano-SIM) or Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | |
Network | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | |
Bands | -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (Dual SIM model only) CDMA 800 / 1900 & TD-SCDMA -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 CDMA2000 1xEV-DO -4G - LTE -5G - SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave |
-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only) -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 -4G - LTE -5G - SA/NSA |
|
Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A (7CA) Cat20 2000/200 Mbps; 5G (5+ Gbps DL) | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A | |
GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
Edge | Yes | Yes | |
Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | |
GPS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | |
NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) | |
USB | USB Type-C 3.2, USB On-The-Go | USB Type-C 2.0, USB On-The-Go | |
Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE | |
Harmful irradiation |
SAR - 1.03 W/kg (head) 1.15 W/kg (body) SAR EU - 1.21 W/kg (head) 1.59 W/kg (body) |
SAR - 1.14 W/kg (head) SAR EU - 1.28 W/kg (head) 1.42 W/kg (body) |
Music and Audio
Radio | No | ||
Headphone jack | No | No | |
Others | - 32-bit/384kHz audio -Tuned by AKG |
Other features
Sensors | - Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | - Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | |
Other extras |
- Samsung DeX, Samsung Wireless DeX (desktop experience support) -Bixby natural language commands and dictation -Samsung Pay (Visa, MasterCard certified) - Fast charging 25W -USB Power Delivery 3.0 -Fast Qi/PMA wireless charging 15W -Reverse wireless charging 4.5W - IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins) |
- Fast charging 25W - IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 mins) |